LETTER
Preparation of 2-Nitrophenylamines under Microwave Conditions
565
Table 2 Comparison between Heating in Oil Bath (∆) and Micro-
wave Irradiation (MW)
Table 3 Synthesis of N-Substituted 2-Nitrophenylamines (3a–h)
O
N+
O
O–
NH2
N
O–
R
O
N
H
N
OH
N
H
+
X
OMe
Prod- R
uct
Domestic
Yield mpc
Ref.
OMe
1
1
a
b
X=F
X=Cl
Microwave,a (%)
Time (min)
b
(°C)
Substrate Reaction conditions Yield (%, ∆)b Yield (%, MW)b,c
5d
5d
3a
8
8
93
90
83–86
OMe
CH3
1
1
a
8 min, 90 °Ca
10 min, 90 °Ca
23
–d
93
90
3
b
67–70
b
a
4d
The temperature measured by immediately introducing a thermo-
3c
20
20
75
80
135–137
148–50
Cl
meter at the end of irradiation
b
Yield of isolated product, based on 2-fluoronitrobenzene or
3
3
3
3
d
e
f
5d
2
-chloronitrobenzene;
Br
c
TM
National domestic microwave oven (90 W).
d
Not detected by TLC.
20
20
20
70
60
75
82–83
84–86
63–64
5d
F
In order to extend the reaction scope, seven substituted
anilines and one aliphatic amine were used in the reac-
–d
COOEt
1
2
tion. All products were purified by the crystallization
from petroleum ether and formed in moderate to good
yield (60–93%), which are summarized in Table 3. The
data indicated that under microwave irradiation and sol-
vent-free condition, aliphatic amines and substituted
anilines with electron donating groups react smoothly
with compound 1 in the presence of anhydrous potassium
fluoride and potassium carbonate. But the substituted
anilines with electron withdrawing groups had low yields
due to their deactivating effect. It should also be noted that
there was no by-product separated under the reaction con-
ditions.
–d
g
F
–d
3
h
2
88
64–66
a
b
c
d
NationalTM domestic microwave oven (90 W).
All yield listed refer to pure isolated products based on compound 1.
Uncorrected.
1
All compounds are characterized by H NMR (300 MHz) in CDCl
and MS. Elemental Analysis were satisfactory for the products 3f, 3g,
h.
3
3
In conclusion a microwave-enhanced method for synthe-
sizing 2-nitrophenylamines has been developed which in-
volves the use of a solvent-free mixture of anhydrous
potassium fluoride and cheap potassium carbonate. The
process is highly efficient with easy workup.
(
3) (a) Wolfe, J. P.; Tomori, H.; Sadighi, J. P.; Yin, J.;
Buchwald, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1158. (b) Emoto,
T.; Kubosaki, N.; Yamagiwa, T.; Kamilawa, T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 355.
(
4) Kulagowski, J. J.; Rees, C. W. Synthesis 1980, 215.
Acknowledgement
(5) Zhu, Y. F.; Lin, G. Q.; Chen, Y. Q. Synthesis 1990, 430.
(
6) (a) Abramovich, R. A. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1991, 23,
We are grateful for Prof. Xiaotian Liang and Guangzhong Yang for
their advice on this work. We also wish to thank the Department of
Analytical Chemistry for support.
683. (b) Bose, D. S.; Jayalakshmi, B. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 1713.
(
(
7) Loupy, A.; Petit, A.; Hamelin, J.; Texier-Boullet, F.;
Jacquault, P.; Mathe, D. Synthesis 1998, 1213.
8) (a) Salmoria, G. V.; Dall’Ogllo, E.; Zucco, C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 2471. (b) Cherng, Y. J. Tetrahedron 2002,
58, 887. (c) Cherng, Y. J. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 1125.
(d) Cherng, Y. J. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4931.
References
(
1) (a) Anon, U. K. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents
002, 12, 601. (b) Clande, P.; Carine, E.; Stephane, R.;
2
Gerald, B.; Jean-Claudde, G. B.; Gerard, H. J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 2000, 3999.
2) (a) Lantz, R. L.; Obellianne, P. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1956,
(9) (a) Kidwai, M.; Sapra, P.; Dave, B. Synth. Commun. 2000,
30, 4479. (b) Chaouchi, M.; Loupy, A.; Marque, S.; Petit, A.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 1278.
(
3
11. (b) John, H. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988,
(10) Grigor’ev, A. D.; Dmitrieva, N. M.; EI’tsov, A. V.; Ivanov,
A. S.; Panarina, A. E.; Sokolova, N. B. Russ. J. Gen. Chem.
1331.
1997, 67, 981.
Synlett 2003, No. 4, 564–566 ISSN 0936-5214 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York