Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
monium salts formed a tris[2]pseudorotaxane that could
further be transferred into [4]pseudocatenanes.7 Here, we
report a novel triptycene-based host 1 containing two
DB24C8 moieties, which show the complexation not only
with dibenzylammonium salts to result in a bis[2]pseudo-
rotaxane but also with paraquats8 to form stable clip-shaped
complexes in solution and in the solid state (Figure 1).
Moreover, the complexation process between 1 and guests
3 and 4 can be chemically controlled.
due to charge transfer between the electron-rich aromatic
rings of the host 1 and the electron-poor pyridinium rings
of the guest 2. Similarly, the mixed solution of 1 and 3 also
showed typical charge-transfer features but the color is
1
yellow. As shown in Figure 2, the H NMR spectrum of a
Figure 2. Partial 1H NMR spectra (300 MHz, CD3CN, 295 K) of
(a) free host 1, (b) free guest 2, and (c) 1 and 1.0 equiv of 2.
[1]0 ) 2 mM.
Figure 1. Structure and proton designations of the host 1 and guests
2-4.
1:1 mixture of 1 and 2 in CD3CN showed a great difference
with those for host 1 and guest 2. Consequently, the proton
H7 of paraquat ring showed a significant upfield shift
(∆δ ) 0.901 ppm), which may be due to the strong shielding
effect of the aromatic rings in 1. Similarly, the H1-H5 proton
signals of 1 also shifted upfield. In contrast, a considerable
downfield shift of the methyl protons in guest 2 was
observed, which is attributed to the hydrogen bond interac-
tions and its position in the deshielding region of the aromatic
rings of 1. These observations suggested that a stable
complex between 1 and guest 2 was formed. Furthermore,
1H NMR spectroscopic titrations afforded a quantitative
estimate for the complex of 1 and 2 by monitoring the
changes of the chemical shift of the proton H7 in the paraquat
ring. The results showed that a 1:1 complex 1‚2 was formed
by a mole ratio plot.10 Accordingly, the apparent association
constant between 1 and paraquat 2 was calculated to be
Ka,exp,1‚2 ) 1.63((0.3) × 104 M-1.11 Similarly, 1 and the
paraquat derivative 3 also formed a 1:1 complex, and the
apparent association constant (Ka,exp,1‚3) was determined to
be 136 ((22) M-1. The big Ka,exp difference between 1‚2
and 1‚3 presumably results from the different bonding
manner of host 1 with guests 2 and 3. For complex 1‚2, there
exist strong NOE effects between N-methyl protons, pyri-
dinium protons (H6) of the guest, and crown ether protons
Synthesis of host 1 is depicted in Scheme 1. Reaction of
the triptycene derivative 55d and 2 equiv of 1,2-bis[2-[2-(2-
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Host 1
tosyloxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethoxy]benzene 67 under high dilution
conditions afforded 1 in 46% yield. Host 1 was characterized
1
by H NMR, 13C NMR, MALDI-TOF MS, and elemental
analysis.9
When host 1 and paraquat 2 (2 mM each) were mixed in
acetonitrile, they gave a deep orange solution immediately
(5) (a) Ma, J. C.; Dougherty, D. A. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1303-1324.
(b) Corbett, P. T.; Tong, L. H.; Sanders, J. K. M.; Otto, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 8902-8903. (c) Zhu, X. Z.; Chen, C. F. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 917-924. (d) Zong, Q. S.; Chen, C. F. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 211-
214.
(6) Ashton, P. R.; Campbell, P. J.; Chrystal, E. J. T.; Peter, T. G.; Menzer,
S.; Phlip, D.; Sepencer, N.; Stoddart, J. F.; Tasher, P. A.; Willams, D. J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 1865-1869.
(10) Tsukube, H.; Furuta, H.; Odani, A.; Takeda, Y.; Kudo, Y.; Inoue,
Y.; Liu, Y.; Sakamoto, H.; Kimura, K. In ComprehensiVe Supramolecular
Chemistry; Atwood, J. L., Davies, J. E. D., MacNicol, D. D., Vogtleand,
F., Lehn, J. M., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, 1996.
(11) Complexation between 1 and 2 was determined to be non-
concentration dependent, which is in contrast with the complex formed by
DB24C8 and 2.8 This result indicated that complexation of 2 with the host
1 occurred in a way different from the complexation of DB24C8. For the
determination of the Ka,exp, see the Supporting Information.
(7) Zhu, X. Z.; Chen, C. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13158-13159.
(8) Gibson et al. recently mentioned in a paper that DB24C8 can form
a 1:1 complex with the paraquat in solution, but a 2:1 complex in the solid
state. Huang, F.; Jones, J. W.; Slebodnick, C.; Gibson, H. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 14458-14464.
(9) See the Supporting Information.
1070
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 6, 2006