Zhou, Balfour, and Qian: B 4⌺ and d 2⌸ states of CrN
4482
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are unable to assign the weak quartet system with
confidence. Its sub-band locations give approximately values
for the spin–orbit splitting and vibrational frequency of 60
and 900 cmϪ1, respectively. No quartet state of suitable en-
Financial support for this research was provided through
operating grants to W.J.B. and C.Q. from the Natural Sci-
ences & Engineering Research Council of Canada and the
University of Victoria. The authors wish to thank Jianying
Cao for helpful discussions and a referee for constructive
comments.
4
4
ergy in CrN other than the A ⌸ and B ⌺Ϫ states is pre-
dicted from the electronic configurations 1␦291,
1␦2101, and 1␦241. However, Merer and co-workers
4
have identified three low-lying quartet states, 4⌸ and
⌽
derived from 911␦141, and ⌬ from 911␦110 elec-
tronic configurations in the spectra of VO.34 If the weak CrN
system has as its upper state the corresponding 4⌸(1␦11),
a question remains as to why the observed transition from
the ground state is so weak.
4
1
1 W. J. Balfour, C. X. W. Qian, and C. Zhou, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 4383
͑1997͒.
2 H. Li, C. M-T. Chan, and A. S-C. Cheung, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 176, 219
͑1996͒.
3 A. J. Marr, M. E. Flores, and T. C. Steimle, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 8183
͑1996͒.
A larger spin–rotation coupling constant ␥ was found for
4
4
the B ⌺Ϫ state than for the ground-state X ⌺Ϫ in the fit-
ting, either when bands were treated individually or together
as a group. The ␥ parameter is actually an effective one since
it includes not only the first order contribution from spin–
rotation interaction HSR, but also second-order contributions
principally from coupling to 4⌸ states (HSOϫHROT).27,31
4 K. Y. Jung, T. C. Steimle, D. Dai, and K. Balasubramanian, J. Chem.
Phys. 102, 643 ͑1995͒.
5 N. S-K. Sze and A. S-C. Cheung, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 173, 194 ͑1995͒.
6 Y. Azuma, G. Huang, M. P. J. Lyne, A. J. Merer, and V. I. Srdanov, J.
Chem. Phys. 100, 4138 ͑1994͒.
7 K. J. Jung, D. A. Fletcher, and T. C. Steimle, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 165, 448
͑1994͒.
4
4
The A ⌸ state lies much closer to the B ⌺Ϫ state than it
8 R. S. Ram and P. F. Bernath, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 11B, 225 ͑1994͒.
9 R. S. Ram, P. F. Bernath, W. J. Balfour, J. Cao, C. X. W. Qian, and S. J.
Rixon, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 168, 350 ͑1994͒.
does to the X ⌺Ϫ state and a greater second-order contribu-
4
tion to ␥(B ⌺Ϫ) is to be expected. The contribution from
4
10 R. S. Ram and P. F. Bernath, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 165, 97 ͑1994͒.
11 E. J. Friedman-Hill and R. W. Field, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 6141 ͑1994͒.
12 D. A. Fletcher, K. J. Jung, and T. C. Steimle, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 4288
͑1993͒.
͑second order͒ spin–orbit coupling to 2⌺ is not significant at
our experimental resolution and the parameters ␥1 and ␥2 in
Table V were then taken to be identical.
13 W. J. Balfour, A. J. Merer, H. Niki, B. Simard, and P. A. Hackett, J.
Chem. Phys. 99, 3288 ͑1993͒.
A matrix-based fit was also performed for the previously
4
4
analyzed A ⌸←X ⌺Ϫ transition. The procedure gave a
14 D. A. Fletcher, K. J. Jung, and T. C. Steimle, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 901
͑1993͒.
satisfactory fit in terms of standard deviation, yielding the
following ⌳-doubling parameters ͑in cmϪ1͒ for the A ⌸
4
15 R. S. Ram and P. F. Bernath, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 6344 ͑1992͒.
16 B. Simard, H. Niki, and P. A. Hackett, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 7012 ͑1990͒.
17 B. Simard, C. Masoni, and P. A. Hackett, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 136, 44
state: oϩpϩqϭ0.418(30), pϩqϭ9.38(10)ϫ10Ϫ5, and q
ϭ6.78(8)ϫ10Ϫ5. However, as may be observed, these val-
ues do not satisfy the relations p/qϭA/B and p2ϭ4oq, ex-
pected from the ‘‘pure precession’’ approximation, which
assumes the ⌳-doubling to arise from the interaction with a
͑1989͒.
18
¨
Y. Azuma, J. A. Barry, M. P. J. Lyne, A. J. Merer, J. O. Schroder, and J.
´
´
L. Femenias, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 1 ͑1989͒.
19 S. L. Peter and T. M. Dunn, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 5333 ͑1989͒.
20
´
´
´
J. L. Femenias, C. Athenour, K. M. Rao, and T. M. Dunn, J. Mol. Spec-
trosc. 130, 269 ͑1988͒.
4
4
single ⌺ state with an identical potential curve. The A ⌸
state in CrN is influenced by its proximity to both the B ⌺Ϫ
4
21 R. C. Carlson, J. K. Bates, and T. M. Dunn, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 110, 215
͑1985͒.
2
and d ⌸ states. Hence the ⌳-doubling in the A state is not
22 K. Brabaharan, J. A. Coxon, and A. B. Yamashita, Can. J. Phys. 63, 997
simply related to the spin–rotation constant of the B-state.
In conclusion, three new bands in the electronic spec-
trum of CrN have been rotationally analyzed. The upper
͑1985͒.
23
´
´ ´
C. Athenour, J. L. Femenias, and T. M. Dunn, Can. J. Phys. 60, 109
͑1982͒.
4
2
2
states are representatives of ⌺Ϫ, ⌸1/2 , and ⌸3/2 symme-
24 A. E. Douglas and P. M. Veillette, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 5378 ͑1980͒.
25 J. F. Harrison, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 3513 ͑1996͒.
26 A. S-C. Cheung, A. W. Taylor, and A. J. Merer, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 92, 391
͑1982͒.
2
tries. The wave function of the d ⌸ state has been charac-
terized through an analysis of the spin–orbit interactions in-
2
4
27 R. W. Martin and A. J. Merer, Can. J. Phys. 51, 125 ͑1973͒.
28 R. W. Martin and A. J. Merer, Can. J. Phys. 51, 634 ͑1973͒.
29 J. M. Brown and A. J. Merer, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 74, 488 ͑1979͒.
volving the d ⌸ and A ⌸ states. Analysis shows that the
2
spin–orbit coupling in the d ⌸ must involve ␦ and elec-
trons associated with the Cr atom. The interaction between
30 The a value is slightly different from that used in Ref. 1. This new value
4
2
B ⌺Ϫ and d ⌸ states, and its dependence on the vibra-
is deduced with the effect of 2⌸ and 4⌸ perturbation removed.
31 H. Lefebvre-Brion and R. W. Field, Perturbations in the Spectra of Di-
atomic Molecules ͑Academic, Orlando, 1986͒.
tional quanta can be qualitatively understood from the nature
4
of the spin–orbit coupling and from the fact that the B ⌺Ϫ
32 A. G. Adam, Y. Azuma, J. A. Barry, A. J. Merer, U. Sassenberg, J. O.
2
and d ⌸ states have very different bond lengths. A quanti-
¨
´ ´
Schroder, G. Cheval, and J. L. Femenias, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 6240
͑1994͒.
tative deperturbation analysis was also attempted, but with
limited success due to interactions with a nearby, uncharac-
terized, dark quartet state.
33 R. N. Zare, Angular Momentum ͑Wiley, New York, 1988͒.
34 A. J. Merer, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 40, 407 ͑1989͒.
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 107, No. 12, 22 September 1997
128.59.222.12 On: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:15:18