1884
F. Faigl et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 22 (2011) 1879–1884
The salt was suspended in water (1 mL) and a saturated sodium
UV detector 222 nm, 20 °C, retention time for (S)-3: 18.4 min., for
(R)-3: 22.0 min.
carbonate solution (5 mL) was poured into it. The resolving agent
was extracted with dichloromethane (3 ꢀ 5.0 mL), then the aque-
ous solution was acidified with hydrochloric acid solution until
pH 1. After half an hour of stirring at 5 °C, the precipitate was fil-
tered off, washed with ice water and dried. Thus optically active
4.5. Crystal structure determination
A selected single crystal (0.4 ꢀ 0.3 ꢀ 0.2 mm) of (S)-1ꢂ(R)-3 was
1 was obtained (0.20 g, 80%, ee 96%), ½a D25
ꢃ
¼ ꢁ43:1 (c 1.0, EtOH).
mounted on a Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer (graphite
The optically active dicarboxylic acid samples 1 were quantita-
tively converted into their bismethyl esters before HPLC analysis.
HPLC measurements were carried out on Chiralpak AD–H column
monochromator Cu-K radiation, k = 1.54187 Å). Data collection
a
was performed at room temperatures (T = 295 2 K). Crystal data
for (S)-1ꢂ(R)-3: C22H19F3N2O6, Fwt.: 464.39, colorless, chunk, mono-
clinic, space group P21, a = 11.9804(5) Å, b = 7.8115(3) Å, c =
12.9927(5) Å, b = 118.252(2)°, V = 1071.07(7) Å3, Z = 2, Dx =
1.440 g/cm3. Initial structure model was obtained by SHELXS-97,
completed by successive difference Fourier syntheses and refined
to convergence by SHELXL-97.15 Anisotropic full-matrix least-
squares refinement on F2 for all non-hydrogen atoms yielded
R1 = 0.0356 and wR2 = 0.0982 for 1332 [I >2s(I)] and R1 = 0.0375
and wR2 = 0.1002 for all (3395) intensity data, (number of param-
eters = 302, goodness-of-fit = 1.070, extinction coefficient =
0.0052(7), absolute structure parameter x = 0.05(15)).
(5
l
m, 250 ꢀ 4.6 mm), eluent hexane/2-propanol = 98/2, 0.8 mL/
min, UV detector 256 nm, 20 °C, retention time for (S)-1 ester:
9.8 min, for (R)-1 ester: 11.3 min.
4.2.1. 1-[2-Carboxy-6-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1H-pyrrole-2-
carboxylic acid methyl 2-phenylglycinate salt (after 161 h
crystallization)
IR (KBr, cmꢁ1): 3481, 3122, 2854, 2635, 2502, 2080, 1994, 1750,
1676, 1529, 1433, 1316, 1252, 1131. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz)
dH (ppm): 7.94 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.90 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.41–7.35
(5H, m), 6.81 (1H, s), 6.74 (1H, dd, J = 2.1, 3.3 Hz), 6.19 (1H, t,
J = 3.2 Hz), 4.89 (1H, s), 3.65 (3H, s). Anal. Calcd for C22H19F3N2O6
(464.39): C, 56.90; H, 4.12; N, 6.03. Found: C, 56.86; H, 3.90; N,
6.13.
CCDC 844299 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The
4.3. Enantiomeric enrichment of the dicarboxylic acid 1 from
the filtrate of the resolution; a typical example
Acknowledgements
This work is connected to the scientific program of the ‘Devel-
opment of quality-oriented and harmonized R+D+I strategy and
functional model at BME’ project. This project is supported by
the New Hungary Development Plan (Project ID: TÁMOP-4.2.1/B-
09/1/KMR-2010-0002). A part of the project was sponsored by
the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA, Project No.:
048362). Costs of the SXRD studies were in part defrayed by OTKA
K-75869.
An enantiomeric mixture of (R > S)-1 was isolated from the fil-
trate of the diastereoisomeric salt formation reaction. The solvent
was evaporated, and the residue was worked up in an analogous
way to the work-up procedure of the crystalline diastereoisomeric
salt (see Section 4.2). Pure (R)-1 isomer was obtained by recrystal-
lization of (R > S)-1 (0.25 g, 0.84 mmol, ee 80%) from ethyl acetate
(1 mL). The crystalline product was 0.185 g (74%, ee >99%).
4.4. Second order asymmetric transformation of methyl 2-
phenylglycinate 3; a typical example
References
1. Tatsuta, K.; Itoh, M. J. Antibiot. 1994, 47, 602–605.
2. Genin, M. J.; Allwine, D. A.; Anderson, D. J.; Barbachyn, M. R.; Emmert, D. E.;
Garmon, S. A.; Graber, D. R.; Grega, K. C.; Hester, J. B.; Hutchinson, D. K.; Morris,
J.; Reischer, R. J.; Ford, C. W.; Zurenko, G. E.; Hamel, J. C.; Schaadt, R. D.; Stapert,
D.; Yagi, B. H. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 953–970.
3. Campiani, G.; Morelli, E.; Fabbrini, M.; Nacci, V., et al J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42(21),
4462–4470.
4. Remers, W. A.; Rao, S. N.; Singh, U. C.; Kollman, A. J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 1256–
1263.
Racemic methyl 2-phenylglycinate 3 (0.276 g, 1.67 mmol) was
dissolved in toluene (3 mL) and (S)-1-[2-carboxy-6-(trifluoro-
methyl)phenyl]-1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic
acid
(S)-1
(0.5 g,
1.67 mmol, ee >99%) in acetone (1.5 mL) was added to it. Water
(0.5 mL) was poured into the reaction mixture and stirred at
40 °C. The diastereoisomeric salt (S)-1ꢂ(R)-3 was filtered off after
20 h. The crystals were washed with toluene and dried to yield
0.714 g of a white solid (92%).
5. WO 2010/042626 patent application (CAN 152:476951).
6. Faigl, F.; Tarkanyi, G.; Fogassy, K.; Tepfenhart, D.; Thurner, A. Tetrahedron 2008,
64, 1371–1377.
}
7. Fogassy, K.; Harmat, V.; Bölcskei, Zs.; Tárkányi, G.; Toke, L.; Faigl, F. Tetrahedron:
The salt was suspended in water (2 mL) after which saturated
sodium carbonate solution (10 mL) was added. Amine was ex-
tracted with dichloromethane (3 ꢀ 8.0 mL) and then the organic
phase was dried over sodium sulfate. The organic solvent was
evaporated. Thus optically active 3 was obtained (0.248 g, 90%,
Asymmetry 2000, 11, 4771–4780. Unfortunately, there is a mistake in the cited
article. The wrong absolute configuration was given for (+)-1 in the text and in
the stereochemical abstract. The appropriate configuration of (+)-1 is (Ra).
8. Faigl, F.; Fogassy, E.; Nográdi, M.; Pálovics, E.; Schindler, J. Teterahedron:
Asymmetry 2008, 19, 519–536.
9. Program PLATON Spek, A. L. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D 2009, 65, 148–155.
10. Gavezzotti, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 309–314.
ee 95%), ½a 2D5
¼ ꢁ154 (c 1.0, EtOH).
ꢃ
11. Gavezzotti, A.; Filippini, G. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 4831–4837.
12. Mercury CSD 2.0—new features for the visualization and investigation of
crystal structures Macrae, C. F.; Bruno, I. J.; Chisholm, J. A.; Edgington, P. R.;
McCabe, P.; Pidcock, E.; Rodriguez-Monge, L.; Taylor, R.; van de Streek, J.;
Wood, P. A. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2008, 41, 466–470.
13. Clark, J. C.; Phillips, G. H.; Steer, M. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1976, 475–
481.
14. Lopata, A.; Faigl, F.; Fogassy, E.; Darvas, F. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 1984, 14, 322–
324.
The filtrate of the diastereoisomeric salt formation was concen-
trated under reduced pressure and then was added to an aqueous
solution of the salt decomposition. It was then acidified with
hydrochloric acid until pH 1. After half an hour of stirring at 5 °C,
the precipitate was filtered off, washed with ice water and dried.
Thus optically active 1 was recovered (0.45 g, 90%, ee >99%).
The HPLC measurements of optically active amino ester sam-
15. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 2008, 64, 112–122.
ples 3 were carried out on Kromasil 5-AmyCoat column (5
lm,
250 ꢀ 4.6 mm), eluent hexane/2-propanol = 90/10, 0.5 mL/min,