channel organization. The strategy for the synthesis of 2 is
outlined in Scheme 1.
spiroacetal 5. This latter system was envisioned to arise via
the acetylene 6 by partial reduction to the cis-olefin and
spirocyclization.
6
Both precursors, dibromoolefin 7 and lactone 8, can be
7
readily prepared from 9 by standard methodologies (Scheme
Scheme 1. Retrosynthesis of the Tetracyclic Polyether 2
2). Coupling of lactone 8 with the acetylene anion generated
in situ from dibromide 7 gave the hemiacetal 21, which was
further treated with CSA/MeOH to produce the acetal 6 (62%
yield, over two steps). Partial hydrogenation of 6 and
treatment of the resulting olefin with BF
3
2
‚Et O/MeCN gave
8
the spiroketal 23 (84% yield), which was then oxidized with
9
TPAP-NMO (for abbreviations see ref 23) to furnish ketone
5
(88% yield). Reduction of 5 using BF
resulted in the desired diol 4 (R ) H) (84% yield).
Compound 3 was prepared in 64% yield by treatment of 4
R ) H) with t-BuOK (2.2 equiv) and excess allyl diethylene
glycol toluene-p-sulfonate in THF at 25 °C. Finally, reaction
in CH Cl (0.005 M) with 10 mol % of bis(tricyclohexyl-
3
‚Et
2 3
O and Et SiH
10
(
3
2
2
phosphine)benzylideneruthenium dichloride, at 25 °C for 5
5
h, provided 81% of the macrocycle 2.
We have studied the conformational behavior of 4 (R )
Ac) by NMR methods coupled with force-field computa-
1
1,12
1
1
tion.
Averaged H- H coupling constants over the
1
3
calculated whole set of conformers gave a 500 MHz
simulated H NMR spectrum fully in agreement with the
experimental one. Calculated interproton distances obtained
from 2D-NOESY and those corresponding to each con-
former exhibit a very good agreement, showing that, in
solution, 93% of the conformer population is covered by two
major conformations: R ) â ) γ ) 180° (66%, 86%, and
1
14
1
5
8
0%, respectively) and R ) 55° (18%), â ) γ ) 180° (86%
and 80%).
(6) For a different approach to the synthesis of lactone 8, see: Zheng,
W.; De Mattei, J. A.; Wu, J.-P.; Duan, J. J.-W.; Cook, L. R.; Oinuma, H.;
Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7946-7968.
(7) Compound 9 was prepared from triacetyl-D-glucal according to the
described procedure: Nicolaou, K. C.; Hwang, C.-K.; Marron, B. E.; De
Frees, S. A.; Coulados, E. A.; Abe, Y.; Carroll, P. J.; Snyder, J. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3040-3054.
(8) The exclusive selection of one of the possible conformations for
spiroacetal 23 is a consequence of the stabilizing anomeric and exo-anomeric
effects that direct both C-O bonds to axial positions on the respective rings.
For a review, see: Perron, F.; Albizati, K. J. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 1617-
It was anticipated that the macrocyclic ring in 2 could be
obtained by ring-closing metathesis (RCM) of the bis(allyl)
5
1661.
podand 3 derived from the basic diol 4 (R ) H), which in
turn could be obtained by silane double reduction of the
(9) Ley, S. V.; Norman, J.; Griffith, W. P.; Marsden, S. P. Synthesis
994, 639-666.
10) Applications involving reductive cleavage of the anomeric center
1
(
in spiroacetals have only recently been recognized for their potential
synthetic utility. For recent examples, see: (a) Crimmins, M. T.; Rafferty,
S. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 32, 5649-5652. (b) Oikawa, M.; Veno, T.;
Oikawa, H.; Ichihara, A. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5048-5068.
(11) This is done by minimizing the individual structures by an MM3*
force field implemented in the MacroModel V6.0 program. Mohamadi, F.;
Richards, N. G. J.; Guida, W. C.; Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Caulfield, C.;
Chang, G.; Hendrikson, T.; Still, W. C. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440-
447.
(12) Calculated coupling constants for diacetate 4 (R ) Ac) gave better
agreement with the experimental values than did those constants for free
hydroxyl groups: Haasnot, C. A. G.; De Leeuw, F. A. M.; Altona, C.
Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 2783-2792.
(13) Monte Carlo calculations were made, yielding a set of 192
conformers (see the Supporting Information).
(
3) Reviews related to synthetic models for transmembrane channels:
(
a) Gokel, G. W.; Murillo, O. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 425-432. (b)
Fyles, T. M.; Straaten-Nijenhuis, W. F. In ComprehensiVe Supramolecular
Chemistry; Atwood, J. L., Davies, J. E. D., MacNichol, D. D., V o¨ gtle, F.,
Reinhoudt, D. N., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1996; Vol. 10, pp 53-
7
7. (c) Voyer, N. Top. Curr. Chem. 1996, 184, 1-37. (d) Akerfeldt, K. S.;
Lear, J. D.; Wasserman, Z. R.; Chung, L. A.; DeGrado, W. F. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1993, 26, 191-197.
(4) The reason for using crown ether homologues as the pore-forming
moieties is the fact that their binding ability can be engineered to specific
needs. Thus, the cavity diameter 5.5(5.9)-7.8(7.6) Å of the selected
macroring in 2 and its weaker binding efficiency in comparison with 18-
crown-6 analogues (see the Supporting Information) should allow for the
transport of a wide variety of metal ions.
(
5) (a) K o¨ ning, B.; Horn, C. Synlett 1996, 1013-1014. (b) Marsella, M.
(14) Simulations were done using gNMR 6.3.5 from Cherwell Scientific
Publishing Ltd., The Magdalen Centre, Oxford Science Park, Oxford OX4
4GA, U.K.
(15) Analysis of the spectra were made using TRIAD 6.3 as part of the
package SYBYL 6.3 from Tripos Inc. (Supporting Information).
J.; Maynard, H. D.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36,
1
101-1103. (c) Mohr, B.; Weck, M.; Sauvege, J.-P.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1308-1310. (d) Delgado, M.; Mart ´ı n, J.
D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8387-8390.
726
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 5, 1999