3
62
D.A. Lee et al. / Polyhedron 133 (2017) 358–363
5
. Synthetic details
0
0
5
.1. 3,3 -dibromo-4,4 -bipyridine [10]
To a solution of 2.56 g diisopropylamine (25.3 mmol) in 50 mL
tetrahydofuran, 15.8 mL of 1.6 M n-butyl lithium (25.3 mmol)
was added dropwise at ꢀ90 °C. The solution was stirred at this
temperature for 45 min. 4.0 g 3-bromopyridine (25.3 mmol) was
2
added dropwise and allowed to stir for 1 h. 8.0 g CuCl (59.5 mmol)
was added, air was allowed into the reaction vessel, and the mix-
ture was slowly warmed to room temperature and stirred over-
night. The resulting brown solid was taken up in a mixture of
3
0 mL H
then extracted three times with chloroform. The combined organic
phases were dried with NaSO and the volatiles removed under
2 4 4
O, 15 mL 30% w/w NH OH, and 15 mL saturated NH Cl
4
vacuum. The crude product was purified by column chromatogra-
phy on silica gel (hexanes/ethyl acetate 2:1) to yield 1.23 g (31%) of
0
0
3
,3 -dibromo-4,4 -bipyridine as off-white crystals.
0
5
.2. 9,9-dimethyl-9H-silolo[2,3-c:5,4-c ]dipyridine (1) [9]
0
0
To a solution of 1.0 g 3,3 -dibromo-4,4 -bipyridine (3.18 mmol)
2
Fig. 10. Hydrolysis of 2–3 in D O. Inset shows semi-log plot of [2] over time.
in 40 mL THF was added 4.0 mL 1.6 M n-butyl lithium (6.4 mmol)
dropwise at ꢀ90 °C. The mixture was stirred at this temperature
2 2
for 1 h at 0.5 mL SiMe Cl (4 mmol) was added dropwise and the
mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stir over-
night. The mixture was taken up in 50 mL 1 M NaHCO and
extracted three times with diethyl ether. The combined organic
layers were dried over MgSO and evaporated under vacuum to
yield a light brown oil. The crude product was purified by column
chromatography (SiO , hexanes/ethyl acetate, 1:2) followed by
recrystallization from hexanes to yield 1 as colorless crystals
0.33 g, 49% yield). Crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray analy-
sis were grown via slow evaporation of a filtered diethyl ether
made with an Agilent 8453 diode array UV–Vis spectrophotometer
in a Pine Research Instrumentation honeycomb spectroelectro-
chemical cell. Fluorescence measurements were conducted on a
3
1
13
4
Jobin-Yvon Fluorolog 3 fluorescence spectrometer. H and
C
NMR spectra were acquired using a JEOL 300 MHz NMR spectrom-
eter. For the [29] Si spectra a JEOL 500 MHz NMR spectrometer was
used. Combustion analysis (C, H, and N) was conducted by Atlantic
Microlab, Inc.
Cyclic voltammetry studies were performed using a Princeton
Applied Research Model 273A Potentiostat/Galvanostat employ-
ing a conventional three-electrode setup consisting of a platinum
disk or glassy carbon working electrode, a silver/silver chloride
reference electrode, and a platinum wire auxiliary electrode.
Positive feedback iR compensation was routinely used. Voltam-
mograms were obtained in 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluo-
2
(
1
solution at room temperature.
d = 8.90 (s, 2 H), 8.75 (d, 2 H), 7.76 (d, 2 H) 0.56 (s, 6 H). C{ H}
NMR (CDCl , 75 MHz): d = 153.9, 153.1, 151.7, 133.3, 116.9,
3
H NMR (CDCl , 300 MHz):
13
1
3
2
9
ꢀ
3
3.47 ppm. Si NMR (CDCl , 60 MHz): d = 3.62 ppm. MS (EI): m/
+
+
z = 212.1 (M ), 197.1 ([MꢀCH
3
] ).
0
0
6
rophosphate (TBAPF )/acetonitrile solution using solvent that had
5.3. N,N ,Si,Si -tetramethylsilanoviologen triflate (2)
previously been purified and dried using a solvent purification
system (SPS-400, Innovative Technologies) and subsequently
purged with nitrogen. The supporting electrolyte (TBAPF ) was
6
To a solution of 1 (0.5 g, 2.4 mmol) in acetonitrile (20 mL) was
added methyl triflate (0.79 g, 4.8 mmol) dropwise at 0 °C. The
solution was stirred overnight and diethyl ether allowed to slowly
diffuse into the reaction vessel, yielding the tetramethylsilanovio-
logen, 2, as colorless needles (0.78 g, 61% yield). Crystals suitable
for single-crystal X-ray analysis were grown via slow ether
recrystallized from ethanol and dried under vacuum prior to
use. Ferrocene was used as an internal standard without further
purification.
X-ray crystallographic data was acquired with an Agilent Gem-
ini A Ultra diffractometer. Crystals of suitable size were coated
with a thin layer of paratone-N oil, mounted on the diffractometer,
and flash cooled to 100 K in the cold stream of the Cryojet XL liquid
nitrogen cooling device (Oxford Instruments) attached to the
diffractometer. The diffractometer was equipped with two
sealed-tube long fine focus X-ray sources (Mo target,
diffusion into a saturated acetonitrile solution under a nitrogen
1
atmosphere. H NMR (CDCl
3
, 300 MHz): d = 9.06 (s, 2 H), 8.83 (d,
1
3
1
2 H), 8.61 (d, 2 H), 4.36 (s, 6 H) 0.70 (s, 6 H). C{ H} NMR (CDCl
3
,
75 MHz): d = 157.2, 151.0, 148.7, 142.4, 123.9, 49.5, ꢀ4.58 ppm.
2
9
Si NMR (CDCl
SiS : C, 35.55, H, 3.36, N, 5.18. Found: C, 35.38, H,
3.19, N, 5.20%. MS (MALDI-TOF): m/z = 242.5 (M ), 227.6
3
, 60 MHz): d = 10.0 ppm. Anal. Calc. (%) for
C
16
H
18
N
2
O
6
F
6
2
+
k = 0.71073 Å; Cu target, k = 1.5418 Å),
a four-circle kappa
+
goniometer, and an Atlas CCD detector. CrysAlisPro [20] software
was used to control the diffractometer and perform data reduction
and preliminary analysis. The crystal structure was solved with
([MꢀCH
3
] ).
5.4. Ring-opening hydrolysis product of the silanoviologen (formation
SHELXS [21]. All non-hydrogen atoms appeared in the E-map of the
correct solution. Alternate cycles of model-building in Olex2 [22]
and refinement in SHELXL [21] followed. All non-hydrogen atoms
were refined anisotropically. All hydrogen atom positions were cal-
culated based on idealized geometry, and recalculated after each
cycle of least squares. During refinement, hydrogen atom – parent
atom vectors were held fixed (riding motion constraint).
of 3)
To a solution of 25 mg 1 (0.12 mmol) in 1 mL CD
34 mg CH I (0.24 mmol). The mixture was allowed to stand over-
night, resulting in a red precipitate. The supernatant was decanted
and allowed to slowly evaporate in air to yield crystals of the
hydrolyzed compound 3 which were suitable for single-crystal
3
CN was added
3