78
R. Miyamoto et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 991 (2011) 73–78
tems under study, BTQ–M2+–2aq, are not as large as the systems in
the literature discussed above, and the moieties of the electron do-
nor and accepter have some orbital overlap, which does not indi-
cates ‘‘long-range’’. However, the low-lying LMCT states for BTQ–
M2+–2aq were investigated by configuration interaction singles
(CIS and CIS(D)) [25–27] to confirm the TD-DFT results. The results
of the HF calculation show that excited energy levels and the char-
acter of MOs around the HOMO and LUMO were coincident within
all three complexes (M = Zn, Cd, Hg), while in the results by DFT,
the Hg2+ complex had different properties from the other two com-
plexes (Figs. 5, 7, and 8). It seems that this HF result does not di-
rectly indicate a failure of the DFT calculation because DFT
usually provides more reliable electronic structure in metal com-
plexes than does HF. In fact, the orbital energies of LUMO(88)
and next-LUMO(89) of the Hg2+ complex given by HF were very
close (almost 1/10 order) with respect to the Zn2+ complex case,
and the lowest LMCT state of the Hg2+ complex was only about
1000 cmꢀ1 above the ligand-centered S1 state (by CIS(D) calcula-
tion). Therefore, it would be difficult for the HF level calculation
to provide an accurate estimation for the electronic structures of
the compound including heavy metal elements; further progress
is required in this region.
mercury complex, and the S1 of the former is a pp⁄ transition,
while that of the latter is LMCT.
The present work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for
Scientific Research (C) (No. 17550070) from JSPS.
References
[1] J.P. Desvergne, A.W. Czarnik, Chemosensors of Ion and Molecule Recognition,
Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 1997.
[2] A.W. Czarnik, Fluorescent Chemosensors for Ion and Molecule Recognition,
American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1993.
[3] A.P. de Silva, H.Q.N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugsson, A.T.M. Huxley, C.P. McCoy, J.T.
Rademacher, T.E. Rice, Chem. Rev. 97 (1997) 1515.
[4] L. Prodi, F. Bolletta, M. Montalti, N. Zaccheroni, Coord. Chem. Rev. 205 (2000)
59.
[5] C.W. Rogers, M.O. Wolf, Coord. Chem. Rev. 233–234 (2002) 341.
[6] D.W. Boening, Chemosphere 40 (2000) 1335.
[7] D. Mohan, V.K. Gupta, S.K. Srivastava, S. Chander, Colloids Surface A 177 (2001)
169.
[8] M.F. Yardim, T. Budinova, E. Ekinci, N. Petrov, M. Razvigorova, V. Minkova,
Chemosphere 52 (2003) 835.
[9] D.T. Quang, J.S. Kim, Chem. Rev. 110 (2010) 6280.
[10] J. Kawakami, R. Ohtake, R. Miyamoto, M. Nagaki, S. Ito, Trans. MRS-J 33 (2008)
9.
[11] Gaussian 03, Revision D.01, M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E.
Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheeseman, J.A. Montgomery Jr., T. Vreven, K.N. Kudin,
J.C. Burant, J.M. Millam, S.S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi,
G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G.A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota,
R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M.
Klene, X. Li, J.E. Knox, H.P. Hratchian, J.B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J.
Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R.E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A.J. Austin, R. Cammi, C.
Pomelli, J.W. Ochterski, P.Y. Ayala, K. Morokuma, G.A. Voth, P. Salvador, J.J.
Dannenberg, V.G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich, A.D. Daniels, M.C. Strain, O. Farkas,
D.K. Malick, A.D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J.B. Foresman, J.V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A.G.
Baboul, S. Clifford, J. Cioslowski, B.B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I.
Komaromi, R.L. Martin, D.J. Fox, T. Keith, M.A. Al-Laham, C.Y. Peng, A.
Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P.M.W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M.W. Wong,
C. Gonzalez, J.A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2004.
[12] A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 5648.
[13] C. Lee, W. Yang, R.G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 785.
[14] B. Miehlich, A. Savin, H. Stoll, H. Preuss, Chem. Phys. Lett. 157 (1989) 200.
[15] W.J. Hehre, L. Radom, P.v.R. Schleyer, J.A. Pople, Ab Initio Molecular Orbital
Theory, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1989.
[16] M. Dolg, U. Wedig, H. Stoll, H. Preuss, J. Chem. Phys. 86 (1987) 866.
[17] D. Andrae, U. Häußermann, M. Dolg, H. Stoll, H. Preuß, Theor. Chim. Acta 77
(1990) 123.
[18] E. Runge, E.K.U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 997.
[19] E.K.U. Gross, W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 2850.
[20] R.E. Stratmann, G.E. Scuseria, M.J. Frisch, J. Chem. Phys. 109 (1998) 8218.
[21] R. Bauernschmitt, R. Ahlrichs, Chem. Phys. Lett. 256 (1996) 454.
[22] M.E. Casida, C. Jamorski, K.C. Casida, D.R. Salahub, J. Chem. Phys. 108 (1998)
4439.
[23] A. Dreuw, M. Head-Gordon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 4007.
[24] R.J. Magyar, S. Tretiak, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 3 (2007) 976.
[25] J.B. Foresman, M. Head-Gordon, J.A. Pople, M.J. Frisch, J. Phys. Chem. 96 (1992)
135.
4. Conclusion
The metal-ion recognition of BTQ was investigated by adding
several metal ions (M2+) to a solution of BTQ in acetonitrile. The
shape and intensity of the fluorescence spectra did not change
upon addition of several metal ions, including Cd2+, Ni2+, Zn2+
,
Co2+, Ca2+, and Ba2+. However, the fluorescence emission of BTQ
was quenched with the addition of Hg2+ or Cu2+, and a red shift
of the emission maxima was observed when Hg2+ was added to
the solution. While the emission maxima of free BTQ was at
24,400 cmꢀ1, the emission maxima of BTQ with Hg2+ was at
21,600 cmꢀ1
.
The ab initio calculations using the time-dependent density
functional method with a 6-31+G(d) basis set and ECP for metals
were carried out on the zinc, cadmium, and mercury complexes
of BTQ. Then, the source of the spectroscopic properties shown
above was investigated. The results of the calculation showed the
following: (1) all the metal complexes calculated are more stable
for the NN-conformer rather than NS-conformer, while BTQ itself
has lower energy for the NS-conformer; (2) the energy levels of
the excited singlet and triplet states are similar in the Zn2+ and
Cd2+ complexes, while the Hg2+ complex has lower transition ener-
gies than others; and (3) the character of the excited states were
also different between the zinc and cadmium complexes with the
[26] J. Baker, J. Comput. Chem. 7 (1986) 385.
[27] J. Baker, J. Comput. Chem. 8 (1987) 563.