ChemComm
Communication
by a fluorescence lifetime measurement study (ESI,† Section 6
and 10).6f A very weak FRET emission was observed in phosphate
buffer which could be due to non-radiative deactivation.6c However,
the FRET signal could be optimized upon addition of DMSO to give a
296% enhancement (Fig. 4b). This addition of DMSO possibly fine-
tuned the donor–acceptor interaction to minimize the non-radiative
deactivation process, thereby leading to an increase in intensity.6f
¨
In summary, Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) was
Fig. 3 (a) Overlap of the emission spectrum of TCNBAlaAc (blue) and the
absorbance spectrum of TPhenAlaDo (red). (b) Fluorescence spectra of
individual amino acids (black for 1 and blue for 3) and the tripeptide 6
(red) containing these two amino acids. The mole fractions of triazolyl
chromophoric units in the monomers and in the tripeptide were the same.
Spectra were recorded in CH3CN with a 10 mM concentration.
established in the conceptually designed novel unnatural b-turn
peptide containing a new class of fluorescent unnatural donor–
acceptor amino acids. The FRET process occurred from the TCNB
moiety of TCNBAlaAc (the FRET donor) to the TPhen unit of TPhenAlaDo
(the FRET acceptor). Our developed FRET pair, TCNBAlaAc–TPhenAlaDo
,
wherein both the partners are unnatural amino acids, is new to the
best of our knowledge. As FRET can provide information about
peptide and protein conformation, our unnatural amino acid
pair (FRET pair) and the FRET peptide could find application in
studying the conformational distribution of unstructured peptides
in solution and in FRET-based bioassays.
This work is dedicated to Professor Amit Basak on the occasion of
his 62nd birthday. Financial support from the Council of Scientific
and Industrial Research [CSIR: 01(2330)/09/EMR-II], New Delhi,
Govt. of India, is gratefully acknowledged.
donor amino acid 1 (TPhenAlaDo) and the acceptor amino acid 3
(
TCNBAlaAc) acted as a FRET acceptor and donor, respectively. With
this observation we turned our attention to study the FRET process.
It was observed that the fluorescence intensity of TPhenAlaDo
increased almost four-fold from that of the monomer emission in
the presence of TCNBAlaAc in peptide 6 when it was excited at the
maximum absorbance of TCNBAlaAc (lmax = 272 nm). On the other
hand, the fluorescence intensity of TCNBAlaAc in the peptide decreased
almost seven to eight times that of the monomer fluorescence. This
ratiometric change in fluorescence intensity provided visual evidence
of the FRET process from TCNBAlaAc to TPhenAlaDo (Fig. 3b).6e The
Notes and references
¨
Forster radius and the efficiency of energy transfer were calculated
and found to be 20 Å and 85%, respectively. The donor–acceptor
distance was found to be r = 15 Å. The time-resolved fluorescence
study revealed a decrease in donor lifetime (TCNBAlaAc; lex = 308 nm,
lem = 340 nm) from 1.9 ns to 1.2 ns in peptide 6, indicating the
occurrence of the FRET process. More interestingly, the acceptor
1 (a) C. J. Noren, S. J. Anthony-Cahill, M. C. Griffith and P. G. Schultz, Science,
1989, 244, 182; (b) J. A. Krzycki, Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 2005, 8, 706; (c) K. C.
Schultz, L. Supekova, Y. Ryu, J. Xie, R. Perera and P. G. Schultz, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2006, 128, 13984; (d) C. C. Liu, A. V. Mack, E. M. Brustad, J. H. Mills,
D. Groff, V. V. Smider and P. G. Schultz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 9616.
2 (a) G. MacBeath and S. L. Schreiber, Science, 2000, 289, 1760; (b) J. Zhang,
R. E. Campbell, A. Y. Ting and R. Y. Tsien, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2002,
3, 906; (c) B. N. G. Giepmans, S. R. Adams, M. H. Ellisman and R. Y.
Tsien, Science, 2006, 312, 217.
3 (a) R. F. Wissner, S. Batjargal, C. M. Fadzen and J. E. Petersson, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 6529; (b) H. S. Lee, J. Guo, E. A. Lemke, R. D. Dimla
and P. G. Schultz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 12921; (c) G. Loving and
B. Imperiali, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 13630.
4 (a) S. S. Bag and R. Kundu, J. Org. Chem., 2011, 76, 3348; (b) S. S. Bag,
S. Talukdar, K. Matsumoto and R. Kundu, J. Org. Chem., 2013, 78, 278.
5 (a) J. B. Ball, R. A. Hughes, P. L. Alewood and P. R. Andrews, Tetrahedron,
1993, 49, 3467; (b) Y. L. Angell and K. Burgess, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007,
36, 1674; (c) L. Halab and W. D. Lubell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 2474;
(d) C. Proulx and W. D. Lubell, J. Org. Chem., 2010, 75, 5385; (e) M. L. Tifany
and S. Krimm, Biopolymers, 1972, 11, 2309; ( f ) K. Kim and J. P. Germanas,
J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 2847; (g) K. Oh and Z. Guan, Chem. Commun., 2006,
3069; (h) D. Barbaras and K. Gademann, ChemBioChem, 2008, 9, 2398;
(i) G. Chouhan and K. James, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 1206.
(
TPhenAlaDo) exhibited a biexponential profile (lex = 308 nm, lem
=
380 nm) having a distinct rise component of 3.2 ns and a decay
component of 14.1 ns (ESI,† Tables S8 and S9, Fig. S19). Thus, the
lifetime of the acceptor in the presence of the donor in peptide 6
increases from 13.2 ns (in the absence of the donor) to 14.1 ns (in the
presence of the donor) which is also clearly an indication of FRET.11
While examining the polarity sensitive emission of peptide 6, we
observed to our surprise that FRET-induced fluorescence could be
modulated. Thus, as the polarity of the solvents increased, FRET
emission from TPhenAlaDo (at 390 nm) decreased slightly (Fig. 4a). This
could be due to the influence of the solvent polarity on the FRET
parameters and association within the TPhen–TCNB pair that led to a
slight decrease in FRET emission intensity, which was also supported
¨
6 (a) T. Forster, Discuss. Faraday Soc., 1959, 27, 7; (b) C. A. Royer, Chem. Rev.,
2006, 106, 1769; (c) J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy,
Springer, New York, 3rd edn, 2006; (d) J. M. G. Rogers, L. G. Lippert and
F. Gai, Anal. Biochem., 2010, 399, 182; (e) R. J. Nedumpara, P. J. Manu,
C. P. G. Vallabhan, V. P. N. Nampoori and P. Radhakrishnan, Opt. Laser
Technol., 2008, 40, 953; ( f ) M. Kang, O. K. Nag, S. Hwang, I. Kim, H. Yang,
K. Kyhm and H. Y. Woo, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 15482.
7 (a) V. V. Rostovtsev, L. G. Green, V. V. Fokin and K. B. Sharpless, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 2596; (b) M. Meldal and C. W. Tornøe, Chem.
Rev., 2008, 108, 2952.
8 G. Panda and N. V. Rao, Synlett, 2004, 714.
9 H. Kessler, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1982, 21, 512.
¨
10 (a) Maestro, version 9.0, Schrodinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2009; (b) H.-J.
Lee, H.-M. Park and K.-B. Lee, Biophys. Chem., 2007, 125, 117.
11 (a) A. Adhikari, D. K. Das, D. K. Sasmal and K. Bhattacharyya, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 2009, 113, 3737; (b) C. Banerjee, N. Kundu, S. Ghosh,
S. Mandal, J. Kuchlyan and N. Sarkar, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2013, 117, 9508.
Fig. 4 (a) Solvent-assisted modulation of FRET-induced fluorescence of pep-
tide 6 (10 mM). (b) Amplification of the FRET signal in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0)
upon addition of increasing % concentration of DMSO (lex = 272 nm).
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 433--435 | 435