Inorganic Chemistry
Article
spectra were recorded at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively, on a Bruker
Avance III 400 and referenced to residual solvent peaks. Chemical
shifts are reported in ppm, and coupling constants in Hz. All
photophysical measurements were recorded in acetonitrile at 20 °C.
UV−vis spectra were recorded on an Agilent Technologies Cary 60.
IR spectra were recorded on an Agilent Technologies Cary 630 FTIR
Spectrometer as solids and are reported in wavenumbers (cm−1).
Mass spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu LCMS-IT-TOF in ESI+
mode.
(4H, m, H5/5′ and H3/3′), 6.92 (2H, d, J = 8.9 Hz H7/7′), 6.16
(2H, d, H6/6′), 1.33 (6H, s, eq-Me; 195Pt satellite J = 70.9 Hz), 0.40
(3H, s, ax-Me; 195Pt satellite J = 66.4 Hz); δ 13C NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) 157.4, 146.5 (195Pt satellite J = 15.2 Hz), 145.5, 142.8, 137.2,
133.7 (195Pt satellite J = 5.2 Hz), 130.8 (195Pt satellite J = 6.4 Hz),
127.4, 125.3 (195Pt satellite J = 14.0 Hz), 120.8, −0.0, −5.7 (195Pt
satellite J = 681.8 Hz); IR υmax (cm−1) 2886, 2808, 1567, 1483, 1425,
1219; Crystal data for 27 C21H21N3O4PtS (M = 606.56 g/mol):
monoclinic, space group P21/n (no. 14), a = 6.87831(12) Å, b =
13.65275(18) Å, c = 21.0623(3) Å, β = 97.2931(15)°, V =
1961.91(5) Å3, Z = 4, T = 99.99(10) K, μ(Cu Kα) = 14.681
mm−1, Dcalc = 2.054 g/cm3, 19 671 reflections measured (7.736° ≤ 2Θ
≤ 152.948°), 4087 unique (Rint = 0.0423, Rsigma = 0.0255) which were
used in all calculations. The final R1 was 0.0365 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2
was 0.0967 (all data). CCDC 2013233.
Steady state emission and excitation spectra were recorded on an
Agilent Technologies Cary Eclipse. Luminescence lifetimes were
recorded on a PicoQuant FluoTime 300 exciting with an LDH-P-C-
375 or LDH-P-C405 ps pulsed laser (PicoQuant) operating at 50 and
80 MHz, respectively. The emission signals were digitized using a
high-resolution TCSPC module (PicoHarp 300, PicoQuant) with 25
ps time width per channel. The time-resolved decay curves were
analyzed using FLUOFIT software (PicoQuant) using a one-
exponential model. Quantum yields were estimated relative to
[Ru(bpy)3]·2PF6 in aerated acetonitrile with titration to equi-
absorbing solutions at the excitation wavelengths at around A =
0.05. Degassed measurements were recorded in a quartz cuvette fused
to a T-piece connecting a round-bottom flask and a J. Young tap
connecting a ground glass joint, following three cycles of freeze-pump-
thaw degassing. Iodotrimethyl(N^N)Pt(IV) complexes 1−5 (N^N =
2,2′-bipyridine (bpy) 1, 4,4′-dimethoxy-2,2′-bipyridine (OMebpy) 2,
1,10-phenanthroline (phen) 3, 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline
(Bphen) 4, dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine (DPPZ) 5) were
prepared by literature procedures.12,14 Complexes 6−25 derived
from the reactions of 1−5 with thiophenol, and derivatives, were
metastable, and for details relating to their detection, partial
characterization by crystallography and in some cases NMR and for
details of the mechanistic studies and the preparation of an authentic
sample of 4-mercaptomethylbenzoate disulfide,15 see the Supporting
[PtMe3(4,7′-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline)SO2PhNO2] 28.
To a flask containing [PtMe3I(4,7′-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline)]
4 (25.7 mg, 0.04 mmol), 4-nitrothiophenol (5.9 mg, 0.04 mmol), and
NaOtBu (3.9 mg, 0.04 mmol) were added acetonitrile (4 mL) and
water (1 mL), and the mixture was heated at 60 °C for 30 min, then
cooled to room temperature, and refrigerated overnight, giving a
solution containing orange crystals and a white powder. The mixture
was filtered and washed with water to obtain orange crystals 28 (10.3
mg, 38%).
1
δ H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 9.18 (2H, d, J = 5.2 Hz, H2/2′;
195Pt satellite J = 19.3), 7.91 (2H, s, H4/4′), 7.85 (2H, d, 5.2 Hz, H3/
3′), 7.67−7.51 (10H, m, Ph), 7.11 (2H, 9.0 Hz, d, H9/9′), 6.44 (2H,
6.4 Hz, d, H8/8′), 1.45 (6H, s, eq-Me; 195Pt satellite J = 70.0 Hz),
0.53 (3H, s, ax-Me; 195Pt satellite J = 66.6 Hz); δ 13C NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) 156.9, 150.5, 146.0, 145.8 (195Pt satellite J = 14.7 Hz),
143.0, 135.6, 134.0, 129.8, 129.5, 129.2, 129.1, 125.6, 125.4, 120.8,
0.1, −5.4 (195Pt satellite J = 678.0 Hz); IR υmax (cm−1) 2890, 2812,
1560, 1489, 1217; Crystal data for 28 C33H29N3O4PtS (M = 758.74
g/mol): monoclinic, space group C2/c (no. 15), a = 21.3317(3) Å, b
= 12.75780(10) Å, c = 24.8460(3) Å, β = 110.718(2)°, V =
6324.47(15) Å3, Z = 8, T = 100.0(3) K, μ(CuKα) = 9.245 mm−1, Dcalc
= 1.594 g/cm3, 48 486 reflections measured (7.608° ≤ 2Θ ≤
152.926°), 6617 unique (Rint = 0.0305, Rsigma = 0.0135) which were
used in all calculations. The final R1 was 0.0437 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2
was 0.0987 (all data). CCDC 2013234.
[PtMe3(bpy)SO2PhNO2] 26. To a flask containing [PtMe3I(2,2′-
bipyridine)] 1 (101.3 mg, 0.19 mmol), 4-nitrothiophenol (30.0 mg,
0.19 mmol), and NaOtBu (20.6 mg, 0.21 mmol) were added
acetonitrile (4 mL) and water (1 mL), and the mixture was heated at
60 °C for 30 min, then cooled to room temperature, and refrigerated
overnight, giving a solution containing orange crystals and a white
powder. The mixture was filtered and washed with water to obtain
orange crystals 26 (63.1 mg, 57%).
[PtMe3(dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine)SO2PhNO2] 29. To
a flask containing [PtMe3I(dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine)] 5 (25.5
mg, 0.04 mmol), 4-nitrothiophenol (6.2 mg, 0.04 mmol), and
NaOtBu (4.5 mg, 0.04 mmol) were added acetonitrile (4 mL) and
water (1 mL), and the mixture was heated at 60 °C for 30 min, then
cooled to room temperature, and refrigerated overnight, giving a
solution containing orange crystals and a white powder. The mixture
was filtered and washed with water to obtain orange crystals 29 (20.1
mg, 76%).
1
δ H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN): 8.79 (2H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, H6/6′;
195Pt satellite J = 19.5 Hz), 8.19 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H3/3′), 8.07 (2H,
t, J = 7.9 Hz, H4/4′), 7.67 (2H, t, J = 6.6, H5/5′), 7.34 (2H, d, J = 8.9
Hz, H8/8′), 6.58 (2H, d, J = 9.1 Hz, H7/7′), 1.17 (6H, s, eq-Me;
195Pt satellite J = 70.2 Hz), 0.32 (3H, s, ax-Me; 195Pt satellite J = 66.2
Hz); 13C NMR 158.8, 154.1, 146.6 (195Pt satellite J = 14.3 Hz) 139.0,
134.2 (195Pt satellite J = 6.3 Hz), 127.1 (195Pt satellite J = 14.4 Hz),
123.9 (195Pt satellite J = 8.5 Hz), 121.5, −0.8 (195Pt satellites obscured
by solvent signal), −6.4 (195Pt satellite J = 677.1 Hz); IR υmax (cm−1)
2892, 2812, 1559, 1491, 1418, 1219; Crystal data for 26
1
δ H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 9.80 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H4/4′),
9.18 (2H, d, J = 5.1 Hz, H2/2′; 195Pt satellite J = 18.7), 8.50−8.44
(2H, m, H5/5′), 8.10−8.05 (4H, m, H6/6′ and H3/3′), 7.02 (2H, d,
J = 8.9, H8/8′), 6.48 (2H, d, J = 8.9, H7/7′), 1.44 (6H, s, eq-Me;
195Pt satellite J = 70.5 Hz), 0.53 (3H, s, ax-Me; 195Pt satellite J = 64.6
Hz); 29 was insufficiently soluble to collect 13C data. IR υmax (cm−1)
2892, 2812, 1560, 1491, 1418, 1221; Crystal data for 29
C27H23N5O4PtS (M = 708.65 g/mol): monoclinic, space group
P21/m (no. 11), a = 7.98930(10) Å, b = 13.0769(2) Å, c =
12.1911(2) Å, β = 97.1620(10)°, V = 1263.73(3) Å3, Z = 2, T =
215.00(10) K, μ(Cu Kα) = 11.536 mm−1, Dcalc = 1.862 g/cm3, 13 560
̅
C19H21N3O4PtS (M = 582.54 g/mol): triclinic, space group P1 (no.
2), a = 6.96733(19) Å, b = 8.8748(2) Å, c = 15.4326(4) Å, α =
93.374(2)°, β = 92.851(2)°, γ = 92.314(2)°, V = 950.52(4) Å3, Z = 2,
T = 100.00(10) K, μ(Mo Kα) = 7.523 mm−1, Dcalc = 2.035 g/cm3,
21 289 reflections measured (6.802° ≤ 2Θ ≤ 59.066°), 4782 unique
(Rint = 0.0372, Rsigma = 0.0267) which were used in all calculations.
The final R1 was 0.0181 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2 was 0.0410 (all data).
[PtMe3(1,10-phenanthroline)SO2PhNO2] 27. To a flask con-
taining [PtMe3I(1,10-phenanthroline)] 3 (24.9 mg, 0.05 mmol), 4-
nitrothiophenol (7.40 mg, 0.05 mmol), and NaOtBu (5.2 mg, 0.05
mmol) were added acetonitrile (4 mL) and water (1 mL), and the
mixture was heated at 60 °C for 30 min, then cooled to room
temperature, and refrigerated overnight, giving a solution containing
orange crystals and a white powder. The mixture was filtered and
washed with water to obtain orange crystals 27 (19.6 mg, 71%).
reflections measured (7.308° ≤ 2Θ ≤ 153.144°), 2755 unique (Rint =
0.0501, Rsigma = 0.0320) which were used in all calculations. The final
R1 was 0.0496 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2 was 0.1303 (all data). CCDC
Computational Procedures. DFT calculations used Gaus-
sian09:16 geometry optimization of 26 was performed using M06-
2X/6-31+G(d,p) with SDD ECP/basis on Pt,17 which retains the
stacking interaction between bipy and Ar-NO2. Predicted absorption
spectra and orbital plots were obtained from CAM-B3LYP18 with the
same basis set as optimization, in PCM simulation of CH3CN.19
1
δ H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 9.14 (2H, d, J = 5.0 Hz, H2/2′;
195Pt satellite J = 19.1), 8.59 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, H4/4′), 8.03−7.98
B
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX