118
C. Tonelli, V. Tortelli / Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 101 (2000) 117±123
Last, but not least, the reaction products, both symmetric
0
(Rf ±Rf) and asymmetric (Rf±Rf), if a two component
2.1. Photocoupling of HFPO oligomers
mixture was irradiated, have been isolated and characterized
by spectroscopic and physical±chemical methods. The data
obtained on these model compounds have been useful for
better understanding the properties of similar but more
complex mixtures of industrial relevance.
2.1.1. Preparation of perfluoro-5,6-dimethyl-4,7-dioxa-
decane (PFPE22)
In the photochemical unit (reactor of 0.1 l, optical path
0.7 cm, external distillation apparatus of 0.5 l capacity),
400 g (1.19 mol) of per¯uoro-2-methyl-3-oxa-hexanoyl
¯uoride (HFPO dimer, 2a) were charged. The temperature
during irradiation was maintained at 208C in the reactor and
708C in the distillation pot to allow a constant recycle of the
acyl ¯uoride (Method B). After 50 h GLC analysis showed
that 20% of a new high-boiling product and 80% of starting
reagent were present in the reactor while in the distillation
pot the product was 82%. The whole solution (360 g)
was collected and fractionated to give 197 g of coupled
product and 15 g of higher molecular weight residue. 19F
NMR analysis con®rms that the main product was
[CF3CF2CF2OCF(CF3)±]2, yield: 69.0%.
2. Experimental
The acyl ¯uorides used in the present work are:
CF3OCF2CFꢁCF3OmCF2COF; m 2:9 ꢁ1
C3F7OCFꢁCF3CF2OnCFꢁCF3COF;
n 0; 1; 2 ꢁ2a; b; c
CF3ꢁCF26COF ꢁ3
They were synthesized following literature methods:
by careful fractional distillation of the mixture derived
from photooxidation of hexafluoropropene, after thermal
treatment 1 [9], by anionic oligomerization of HFPO 2a,b,c
[10] and by fluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid 3
[11].
2.1.2. Preparation of perfluoro-5,8,9,12-tetramethyl-
4,7,10,13-tetraoxa-hexadecane (PFPE23)
In a photochemical unit of 0.3 l (Method A) were charged
430 g (0.86 mol) of per¯uoro-2,5-dimethyl-3,6-dioxa-non-
anoyl ¯uoride (HFPO trimer, 2b). After 50 h of irradiation,
402 g of crude mixture were obtained. From GLC, the
composition is: 48% starting, 46% main product, 2% of
lower molecular weight product and 4% of higher molecular
weight product. After work-up as before, 205 g of 99.3%
pure (by GLC) coupling product were obtained whose 19F
NMR is in agreement with the structure [CF3CF2CF2-
OCF(CF3)CF2OCF(CF3)±]2, yield: 55%.
The photocoupling reactions were performed in a photo-
chemical unit which includes an immersion high-pressure
Hanau mercury lamp (150 W), quartz jacketed and cooled
by distilled water or CF2ClCFCl2, and an outer Pyrex
cylindrical reactor. This reactor was provided with magnetic
stirring, cooling system (dry-ice/isopropanol), thermocou-
ple and inlet tube for withdrawing samples (Method A).
Sometimes the reaction was performed by recycling the
volatile acyl ¯uorides after distillation of a part of the
reacting mixture (Method B). The latter experiments
increased the productivity of the reaction, photolyzing only
the pure starting materials whereas the higher-boiling reac-
tion products are isolated as the distillation residue. The
reactions were monitored by GLC analyses until the con-
version reached the desired value. The reaction product
(when conversion was quantitative) was washed with aqu-
eous NaOH solution, the organic layer washed twice with
water, dried over sodium sulphate, ®ltered and distilled in a
30-plates column. When conversion was not complete, the
crude mixture was directly distilled.
19F NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian 200 MHz
spectrometer as neat sample and employing CFCl3 as
internal standard. IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet
205 X FTIR instrument, UV spectra on a Beckman UV 5290
instrument. GLC analyses were performed with a HRGC
533 Carlo Erba instrument equipped with thermoconduc-
tivity detectors (4 m columns packed with 10% Fomblin
YR1 on Chromosorb W HP (60±80 mesh)). Differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC) was carried out using a Perkin
Elmer DSC 2 Calorimeter; calorimetric traces have been
obtained at a 108C/min heating rate.
2.1.3. Preparation of perfluoro-5,8,11,12,15,18-
hexamethyl-4,7,10,13,16,19-hexaoxa-docosane (PFPE24)
Following the same procedure as above (Method A) 400 g
(0.6 mol) of HFPO tetramer 2c were irradiated for 50 h.
After work-up 168 g of coupled product were isolated,
whose structure by 19F NMR was {CF3CF2CF2O[CF(CF3)-
CF2O]2CF(CF3)±}2, yield: 45.0%.
2.2. Photocoupling of perfluoropolyether acyl
fluorides
2.2.1. Photocoupling of CF3O[CF2CF(CF3)O]mCF2COF
In a photochemical reactor of 0.1 l capacity (Method A),
50 g of the acyl ¯uoride 1 were irradiated for 16 h. Con-
version was quantitative (by GLC) and, after work-up, 42 g
of {CF3O[CF2CF(CF3)O]mCF2±}2 were isolated.
2.3. Photocoupling of binary mixtures of acyl fluorides
2.3.1. HFPO dimer and perfluorooctanoyl fluoride
In a 0.1 l photochemical reactor, 42 g (0.1 mol) of
C7F15COF (3) and 34 g (0.1 mol) of n-C3F7OCF(CF3)COF
(2a) were charged. After 8 h of irradiation, the crude