TPA–CH2OH react with 3-(isocyanatopropyl)triethoxysilane.
The crude product was purified by column chromatography,
yielding a white powder. This kind of silane synthesis is widely
used,6,18,21 because it is easy to prepare and contains no metal
residue, which is seldom able to be removed. In addition, the
amide linkage in TPA–CONH–silane is known to improve the
ordering of the SAM through interchain hydrogen bonding.24
Details of the syntheses, surface modification and device
experiments are described in the following paragraphs.
in the case of the ITO). Then they were treated with a 1 : 1 : 5
solution of NH4OH, 35% H2O2 and H2O at 80 uC for 20 min.
The substrates were then placed in water and finally dried
under a stream of dry nitrogen. The cleaned substrates were
used immediately upon preparation.
Monolayer characterization
Static water contact angles were measured using a sessile drop
goniometer. XPS measurements were made using an ESCA-
LAB 200R X-ray photoelectron spectrometer with a mono-
chromatic Al Ka source. The thickness of the SAM was
measured by ellipsometry using an automatic ellipsometer
(Rudolph AutoEL-II) equipped with a HeNe laser (623.8 nm).
Both the imaginary and the real refractive indices of the silicon
wafer were measured prior to self-assembly. The morphologies
of the substrates were evaluated by atomic force microscopy
(AFM) using an AutoProbe CP (Park Scientific Instruments,
Inc.). The measurement was performed in contact mode using
triangle Si3N4 cantilevers in air at room temperature. Surface
work functions were measured using atmospheric photoelec-
tron spectroscopy (RIKEN Keiki AC-2).
Materials
Triphenylamine, phosphorus oxychloride, (3-isocyanatopro-
pyl)triethoxysilane and lithium fluoride were purchased from
Aldrich and used without further purification. TPD [N’-bis(3-
methylphenyl)-N,N’-diphenyl-1,1’-biphenyl-4,4’-diamine] and
Alq3 [tris-(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminium] were purchased from
TCI and purified by gradient sublimation. Sodium acetate
trihydrate, sodium borohydride, sodium hydroxide, triethyl-
amine, pyridine and magnesium sulfate were purchased from
Junsei and used without further purification. All other solvents
and reagents were analytical-grade quality, purchased commer-
cially and used as received unless otherwise indicated. Anhy-
drous grade solvents were used during the SAM formation steps.
Device fabrication
The bare ITO and SAM-modified ITO were loaded into a bell
jar deposition chamber housed in a nitrogen gas glove box. At
1026 Torr, a 50 nm layer of TPD was first deposited, followed
by 60 nm of Alq3 and 1 nm of LiF. Finally, a 70 nm thick
aluminium cathode was deposited.
[4-(Diphenylamino)phenyl]methanol (TPA–CH2OH)
TPA–CH2OH was synthesized by reduction of 4-(diphenyl-
amino)benzaldehyde (TPA–CHO) with sodium borohydride
(NaBH4). TPA–CHO was prepared using the well-known
Vielsmeier reaction according to a literature procedure.23 0.290 g
(7.60 mmol) of NaBH4 dissolved in 15.0 mL of aqueous 0.1 M
NaOH solution was added dropwise into 4.01 g (14.7 mmol) of
TPA–CHO in 50.0 mL of ethanol. The mixture was reacted at
room temperature for 4 h. The solution was extracted with
CH2Cl2–H2O, dried with magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) and then
rotary evaporated. Recrystallization with dichloromethane–
Device characterization
Electroluminescence spectra were obtained with a Minolta
CS-1000. The current–voltage and luminance–voltage char-
acteristics were taken with a current–voltage source (Keithley
238) and a Minolta LS-100.
1
hexane gave a white solid. The yield was 3.72 g (91.9%). H
Results and discussion
NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm) d: 7.21–7.26 (m, 6H), 6.92–6.99
(m, 8H), 5.17 (t, 1H), 4.42 (d, 2H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm)
d: 147.369, 145.858, 137.413, 129.316, 127.822, 123.316,
122.484, 62.658. FT-IR(KBr, cm21) nmax: 3244.0 (nO–H).
For the formation of the SAM (Fig. 1), both the Si wafer
and the ITO were cleaned by a conventional wet cleaning
method.25,26 The pre-cleaned oxide substrates were immersed
in 1 mM anhydrous toluene solution of TPA–CONH–silane
for 1 h, followed by thorough rinsing and sonicating in toluene
for 5 min. They were then transferred to a 100 uC oven under
vacuum for 30 min, after which they were sonicated in toluene
again and finally dried under a stream of nitrogen.
{[4-(Diphenylamino)phenyl]methoxy}-N-(4,4,4-triethoxy-4-
silabutyl)formamide (TPA–CONH–silane)
Within a 250 mL two-necked round-bottomed flask, 10.0 g
(36.3 mmol) of TPA–CH2OH was dissolved in 30.0 mL of
DMF. 10.3 mL (72.6 mmol) of triethylamine was added to
the flask and stirred for a while. Then 8.50 mL (33.0 mmol) of
(3-isocyanatopropyl)triethoxysilane was added into the reaction
mixture and stirred at 70 uC for 48 h. After cooling to room
temperature, the reaction mixture was vacuum concentrated
and the product was purified by column chromatography (ethyl
acetate : hexane ~ 1 : 2). Recrystallization with dichloro-
methane–hexane gave a white solid. The yield was 7.59 g
Si wafers with native oxide were sometimes used instead of
ITO substrates for the convenience of monolayer characteriza-
tion; because ITO has a rough surface morphology and its
transparency is not suitable for surface characterization with,
for example, ellipsometry. It has already been reported that
both Si wafer and ITO have a similar surface density of reactive
sites, about 1026 mol m22 27
First, we measured the water
.
contact angles before and after self-assembly. Because the
hydroxy groups of the oxide layer generate a hydrophilic
surface, both bare Si wafer and bare ITO showed very low
water contact angle values (h % 15u), but after self-assembly,
relatively high values (h ~ 77u for Si wafer and h ~ 75u for
ITO) were observed, indicating that the surfaces of the
substrates had become hydrophobic. As well as these contact
angle measurements, an XPS study was also performed to
investigate the surface atomic composition. Fig. 2 shows the
XPS spectra of Si wafers before (lower) and after (upper) self-
assembly. Each spectrum was normalized with respect to the
peak intensities of abundant elements, that is, Si 2p for Si
wafers. Increases in the C 1s (284 eV) and N 1s (410 eV)
peak intensities confirmed the formation of a SAM com-
posed of carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen and oxygen. In addition
to the above two experiments, the thickness of the SAM
1
(44.4%). mp 80 uC. H NMR (CDCl3, ppm) d: 7.19–7.25 (m,
6H), 6.99–7.07 (m, 8H), 5.01 (s, 2H), 4.94 (s, 1H), 3.78 (q, 4H),
3.17 (q, 2H), 1.58–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.20 (t, 9H), 0.61 (t, 2H). 13C
NMR (CDCl3, ppm) d: 156.405, 147.701, 147.590, 130.497,
129.303, 129.134, 124.326, 124.019, 123.504, 122.875, 66.254,
58.389, 43.422, 23.255; 18.229, 7.578. FT-IR (KBr, cm21) nmax
:
3340.1 (nN–H), 1710.0 (nC~O). EI-MS calcd. for C29H38N2O5Si
522.26, found 522.25 (M1). Anal. (calcd.) C 66.73 (66.64), H
7.78 (7.33), N 5.45 (5.36).
Substrate preparation
Substrates were first cleaned with chloroform, water and then
treated with a 7 : 3 solution of concentrated H2SO4 and 35%
H2O2 at 120 uC for 10 min (This acid-treatment step is omitted
J. Mater. Chem., 2002, 12, 3494–3498
3495