#
-1
#
-1
#
Table 4 Activation parameters, DG (kcal mol at 298.15 K), DH (kcal mol ) and DS (e.u.), for the enolization and ketonization reactions of 2-NCH
in CHCl
3
, CH
2
Cl
2
3
and CH CN
Enolization
Ketonization
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
DG
1
DH
1
DS
1
-TDS
1
DG-1
DH--1
DS-1
-TDS-1
Catalysis by TEA
Cyclohexane
18.5
17.0
15.6
15.3
15.1
—
—
2.54
5.17
7.00
—
—
-44
-40
-27
—
—
13.1
11.9
8.05
19.6
18.1
16.0
15.2
13.8
—
—
4.20
5.53
5.88
—
—
-40
-32
-27
—
—
11.8
9.59
8.05
CCl
CHCl
4
3
CH
CH
2
Cl
CN
2
3
Catalysis by Pyr
Cyclohexane
22.4
21.9
20.3
20.3
20.1
20.1
20.1
20.1
20.2
—
—
7.29
8.82
—
—
—
—
10.4
—
—
-43
-38
—
—
—
—
—
12.8
11.3
—
—
—
—
9.82
23.5
23.0
20.7
20.1
19.6
19.2
19.0
19.0
18.9
—
—
9.02
9.19
—
—
—
—
9.32
—
—
-39
-37
—
—
—
—
—
11.6
11.0
—
—
—
—
9.54
CCl
CHCl
4
3
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
2
3
3
3
3
3
Cl
2
CN–CH
CN–CH
CN–CHCl
CN–CH
CN
2
2
Cl
Cl
2
20 : 80
50 : 50
80 : 20
80 : 20
2
3
2
Cl
2
—
-33
—
-32
Kinetic measurements
procedure was repeated after inverting the configuration of one of
the two molecules. All the adducts obtained were finally optimized,
relaxing all their degrees of freedom by the molecular mechanics
method based on the mm2* force field, as implemented in the
computer program MacroModel v.4.0.
The keto–enol interconversion of 2-NCH was followed spec-
trophotometrically by monitoring the variation of the absorbance
EH
at lmax of the enol form of 2-NCH at different temperatures.
A small aliquot of a stock solution of 2-NCH in CCl was
4
added immediately before each kinetic run to a cuvette containing
Pyr or TEA dissolved in the appropriate organic solvent. The
initial concentration of 2-NCH was ca. 1 ¥ 10 mol dm in all
Acknowledgements
-
3
-3
We thank MIUR-Rome for financial support (PRIN 2006:
protocol number 2006034372).
experiments.
Computational methods
References
Optimized geometries of the tautomeric forms of 2-NCH were
obtained by performing molecular modeling calculations with the
computer program SPARTAN 04 (Wavefunction Inc. 18401 Von
Karman Avenue, Suite 370 Irvine, CA 92612) running on a PC
equipped with Intel Pentium 4, CPU 3.40 GHz, 2 GB of RAM and
OS Windows 2000 Professional. As the first step, conformational
searches on the keto, enol and aci forms of 2-NCH were carried out
by setting the options as follow: MMFF force field; search by the
Montecarlo stochastic algorithm (all rotatable bonds explored);
maximum number of conformers = 100; window energy cut =
1
2
R. P. Bell, The Proton in Chemistry, Chapman and Hall, London 1973.
J. R. Keefe and A. J. Kresge, in The Chemistry of Enols, ed.
Z. Rappoport, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1990, 399.
J. Toullec, in The Chemistry of Enols. ed. Z. Rappoport, Wiley & Sons,
New York, 1990, 323.
3
4
A. J. Kresge, Acc. Chem. Res., 1990, 23, 43.
5 A. Fontana, P. De Maria, G. Siani, M. Pierini, S. Cerritelli and R.
Ballini, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2000, 1641.
G. Angelini, P. De Maria, A. Fontana, M. Pierini and G. Siani, J. Org.
Chem., 2007, 72, 4039.
G. Angelini, C. Chiappe, P. De Maria, A. Fontana, F. Gasparrini, D.
Pieraccini, M. Pierini and G. Siani, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 8193.
6
7
-
1
8 E. Iglesias, New J. Chem., 2005, 29, 625.
9
0 F. Gasparrini, M. Pierini, C. Villani, P. De Maria, A. Fontana and R.
5
kcal mol . As the second step, the most stable conformer
Chun C. Zhou and D. R. Hill, Magn. Reson. Chem., 2007, 45, 128.
obtained of each tautomeric form was further optimized at the
SCF level by the non local density functional model BP with the
1
Ballini, J. Org. Chem., 2003, 68, 3173.
6
–31G** basis set. Transition state geometries for the enol–aci,
11 D. Lee, C. K. Kim, B. S. Lee and I. Lee, J. Comput. Chem., 1997, 18,
5
6.
keto–aci and keto–enol intramolecular interconversions were also
achieved by the same quantistic model, again optimized at the SCF
level. The solvation energies of the tautomers and the transition
states of 2-NCH in cyclohexane were obtained by performing
single-point calculations on the BP optimized geometries by the
conductor like screening model (COSMO), as implemented in the
Amsterdam density functional (ADF) package v. 2007.01.
1
1
2 S. Bergstrom and G. Olofsson, J. Solution Chem., 1975, 4, 535.
3 H. C. Brown and X. R. Mihm, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1955, 77, 1723.
14 P. Wang and A. Anderko, Fluid Phase Equilib., 2001, 186, 103.
1
1
5 A. R. Katritzky, D. C. Fara, H. Yang, K. Tamm, T. Tamm and M.
Karelson, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 175.
6 C. Laurence, P. Nicolet, M. T. Dalati, J.-L. M. Abboud and R. J.
Notario, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 5807.
17 C. Reichardt, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 2319.
8 E. Buncel and S. Rajagopal, J. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 798.
9 (a) S. Alcaro, F. Gasparrini, O. Iucani, S. Mecucci, D. Misiti, M. Pierini
and C. Villani, J. Comput. Chem., 2000, 21, 515; (b) S. Alcaro, F.
Gasparrini, O. Incani, L. Caglioti, M. Pierini and C. Villani, J. Comput.
Chem., 2007, 28, 1119.
1
1
A rigid docking experiment between the most stable conforma-
tions of 2-NCH within the (R) configuration was performed by the
19
home made computer program MolInE, carrying out molecular
mechanics calculations based on the mm2* force field. The same
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2008, 6, 4236–4241 | 4241