D. Vargas-Hernández et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 383–384 (2014) 106–113
107
production of various synthetic fibers, rubbers-resins and farm
chemicals. Besides, as chemical intermediate, it is employed for the
manufacture of lysine, vitamin C, lubricants, dispersing agents and
plasticizers [4].
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained by using
a Siemens D5000 automated diffractometer, over a 2ꢀ range with
Bragg–Brentano geometry using the Cu K␣ radiation and a graphite
monochromator.
Furfuryl alcohol can be produced through hydrogenation of
furfural, either in liquid or vapor phase. The vapor phase hydro-
genation is usually preferred because it can be carried out at
atmospheric pressure. However, in both cases, the main drawback
is the low selectivity to furfuryl alcohol, where the catalyst can
play a key role. Copper chromite has been used in the furan indus-
try for the selective hydrogenation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol for
decades [5]. However, its moderate activity and high toxicity, which
causes severe environmental pollution, have increased the scien-
tific interest for developing new Cr-free catalysts which exhibit
high selectivity for furfuryl alcohol [6].
Hydrogenation of furfural in liquid phase has been widely stud-
ied, using supported metals and amorphous alloys as catalysts,
mainly copper chromite, Cu, Ni, Mo, Co, Pt, Rh, Ru and Pd [3–5,7–14]
and Ni-P, Ni-B and Ni-P-B Ultrafine Materials [15]. However, a
second metal or promoter is added sometimes for improving the
activity or/and the selectivity, by increasing the surface area or
acting as Lewis acid site to polarize the C O bond. Among them,
systems based on Ni or Co modified with Mo [16], Ni-Fe, Cu-Ca
bimetallic catalysts [11,17], promoters such as Co, Zn, Fe, Cr, Pd
and Ni in Cu-MgO [18], Ce [19], Ni-Fe-B [20], or heteropolyacids
have showed high selectivity (98%) to furfuryl alcohol and conver-
sion close to 100%. Nevertheless, the main drawback is that most
of them cannot be reused [21].
The morphology of catalysts was evaluated by Transmission
Electron Microscopy (TEM). Before TEM analysis, samples were
◦
reduced ex situ in pure H (60 ml/min) at 350 C for 2 h, and stored
2
in cyclohexane (Sigma–Aldrich, 99% purity).
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies were per-
formed with a Physical Electronics PHI 5700 spectrometer
equipped with a hemispherical electron analyzer (model 80-365B)
and a Mg K␣ (1253.6 eV) X-ray source. High-resolution spectra
◦
were recorded at 45 take-off angle by a concentric hemispherical
analyzer operating in the constant pass energy mode at 29.35 eV,
using a 720 m diameter analysis area. Charge referencing was
done against adventitious carbon (C 1s at 284.8 eV). The pressure in
−
6
the analysis chamber was kept lower than 5 × 10 Pa. PHI ACCESS
ESCA-V6.0 F software package was used for data acquisition and
analysis. A Shirley-type background was subtracted from the sig-
nals. Recorded spectra were always fitted using Gauss–Lorentz
curves in order to determinate more accurately the binding energy
of the different element core levels. The samples underwent the
same aforementioned ex situ treatment before XPS analysis.
◦
N adsorption–desorption isotherms at −196 C of calcined cat-
2
alysts were obtained using an ASAP 2020 model of gas adsorption
analyzer from Micromeritics, Inc. Prior N2 adsorption, samples
◦
−2
were evacuated overnight at 200 C and 1 × 10 Pa. Pore size dis-
tributions were calculated with the BJH method [23].
While hydrogenation of furfural in liquid phase requires high
pressures, it is carried out under mild conditions in gas phase,
reducing costs. In this sense, some works concerning hydrogena-
tion of furfural to furfuryl alcohol in gas phase have been recently
reported. Although different types of supports, such as MgO and
The reducibility of the calcined samples was determined by H2
temperature-programmed reduction (H -TPR). For these measure-
2
ments, 80 mg of sample was placed in a quartz reactor and heated at
◦
100 C under a He flow of 35 ml/min, and held at this temperature
◦
for 1 h. The reactor was then cooled down to 50 C and the sam-
SiO , have been used in order to increase the surface area and
ple exposed to a stream of 47 ml/min of 10% H /Ar. Subsequently,
2
2
◦
◦
to enhance the metal-support interaction, Cu has been the most
employed metal, due to its high activity and selectivity toward fur-
furyl alcohol [3,4,7,9,12,14,17,18]. However, an active catalyst to
substitute copper chromite catalyst has not been developed yet,
since most of them are unsuitable for industrial applications owing
to severe deactivation phenomena.
the sample was heated up to 700 C at a heating rate of 10 C/min.
The amount of hydrogen consumed as a function of temperature
was monitored on-line on a TCD detector. The water formed dur-
◦
ing reduction was collected with a cryogenic trap at −85 C before
chromatographic analysis.
Copper surface area and dispersion were calculated by N O
2
The aim of this work is to investigate the furfural catalytic hydro-
genation in vapor phase over mesoporous silica-supported Cu
catalysts. The catalytic behavior of these environmentally friendly
materials was compared with that of a copper chromite. The effect
of different experimental parameters, such as catalyst loading,
reaction temperature, weight of catalyst and furfural feed, on the
catalytic performance was studied.
decomposition method. This method is based on the formation of a
0
monolayer of Cu O by oxidation of Cu with a N O flow, according
2
2
0
to the reaction: 2Cu + N O → Cu O + N . Before analysis, the CuO
2
2
2
◦
phase is reduced with a flow mixture of 10 vol.% H /Ar at 5 C/min
2
◦
at 350 C. Then, the catalyst is purged under He and cooled down
to 60 C. The oxidation of Cu to Cu is carried out by chemisorp-
tion of N O (5 vol.% N O/He) at 60 C during 1 h. Then, the catalyst
◦
0
+
◦
2
2
was again purged with an Ar flow and cooled to room tempera-
ture. After this, a temperature programmed reduction was carried
◦
2
. Experimental
out similarly to TPR, raising the temperature up to 350 C on the
freshly oxidized Cu O surface in order to reduce Cu O to Cu.
2
2
2
.1. Catalyst synthesis and characterization
Temperature-programmed oxidation analyses (TPO) were per-
formed in a METTLER TOLEDO TGA/DSC 1 apparatus equipped with
a HT1600 furnace and a MX5 balance with a DSC HSS2 Pt-Rh sen-
The synthesis of SBA-15 silica was carried out as reported by
◦
◦
Zhao et al. [22]. The SBA-Cu catalysts were prepared by incipient
sor. Temperature was varied from 30 to 400 C at a rate of 5 C/min,
wetness impregnation with aqueous solutions of Cu(NO ) ·3H O
under an O flow of 50 ml/min.
3
2
2
2
(
Aldrich, >99% purity). After impregnation, catalysts were dried
overnight at room temperature, and finally calcined for 6 h at
2.2. Catalytic activity
◦
◦
4
00 C, with a heating rate of 1 C/min. The metal loading ranges
between 8 and 20 wt% of Cu. The catalysts were labeled as SBA-
xCu, where x is the wt% of Cu. For comparison, a commercial copper
chromite (Cu-Cr) was also studied (CuCr O ·CuO, Aldrich).
The vapor-phase reduction of furfural was conducted in a
tubular quartz reactor. The pelletized catalyst (325–400 m)
was placed at the center of the reactor tube between two lay-
ꢀ
ꢀ
¼
2
4
Elemental analysis was performed on a PERKIN-ELMER 2400
CHN with a LECO VTF900 pyrolysis oven. Cu contents have been
determined by atomic adsorption spectroscopy (AAS) by using a
Varian SPECTRAA 50.
ers of glass beads and quartz wool. Catalysts were reduced in situ
◦
under a H2 flow (60 ml/min, Airgas, 99.99%) for 2 h at 350 C,
prior to the catalytic test. After reduction, the catalysts were
cooled down to the selected reaction temperature under a H flow
2