Table 2 Characteristics of TCFAD- and ICFAD-based polyurethanes
MPa). TEFAD was found to be more soluble than IEFAD in the
CO
2
-rich phase, certainly because of its lower molecular weight
was also slightly
Total
conv. mol
w
M /g
-1b
◦
a
c
◦
g
T / C
d
and greater volatility. The concentration of CO
2
Monomers T/ C
M
w
/M
n
% Amide
higher in the TEFAD-rich phase than in the IEFAD-rich one.
This behavior could partially govern the kinetics of carbonation,
performed in the presence of TBABr (3 wt%) as catalyst. Indeed,
for a selected (P; T), TEFAD was more easily converted into
TCFAD compared to IEFAD. The polyurethanes obtained by
polyaddition of CFAD monomers with diamines (IPDA and
ICFAD/EDA 70
ICFAD/IPDA 70
ICFAD/IPDA 110 12 h
TCFAD/IPDA 70 12 h
TCFAD/IPDA 110 9 h
3 h
20 h
4 300
9 100
11 700
10 700
13 500
1.1
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
22
—
—
—
—
-25
-21
-19
-16
-13
a
-1
At complete disappearance of the carbonate band at 772 cm , except
-
1
b
EDA) exhibit molecular weights up to 13 500 g mol and glass
for poly(ICFAD/EDA) because of residual carbonate groups. SEC,
solvent THF, PS calibration. Determined by H NMR (integration of
◦
c
1
transition temperatures around -15 C. Interestingly, the side
d
◦
◦
peaks at 2.1 ppm). DSC, temperature ramp from -100 C to 200 C,
reaction between amine and ester functions leading to amide
linkages was not observed when the secondary diamine IPDA
was used as the comonomer.
◦
-1
at 10 C min .
that PUs obtained from polyadditions of ICFAD with EDA
exhibit much lower molecular weights, explained by a loss
of amine functions through the formation of amide linkages.
Fig. 15 shows the SEC traces of polyurethanes obtained from
TCFAD and IPDA (poly[TCFAD-IPDA]) and from ICFAD
References
1
K. C. Frisch, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 1991, 29, 1834–
835.
1
2
F. Seniha G u¨ ner, Y. YagcI and A. Tuncer Erciyes, Prog. Polym. Sci.,
2006, 31, 633–670.
◦
3
4
5
6
A. Gandini, Macromolecules, 2008, 41, 9491–9504.
Z. S. Petrovi c´ , Polym. Rev., 2008, 48, 109–155.
V. Sharma and P. P. Kundu, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2008, 33, 1199–1215.
Z. S. Petrovic, A. Guo and W. Zhang, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym.
Chem., 2000, 38, 4062–4069.
and IPDA (poly[ICFAD-IPDA]), both at 110 C. It also reveals
the absence of residual monomer in the PU samples.
7
8
9
Y. H. Hu, Y. Gao, D. N. Wang, C. P. Hu, S. Zu, L. Vanoverloop and
D. Randall, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2002, 84, 591–597.
L. Monteavaro, E. da Silva, A. Costa, D. Samios, A. Gerbase and C.
Petzhold, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 2005, 82, 365–371.
Z. Lozada, G. J. Suppes, Y. C. Tu and F. H. Hsieh, J. Appl. Polym.
Sci., 2009, 113, 2552–2560.
1
1
1
0 A. Guo, D. Demydov, W. Zhang and Z. S. Petrovic, J. Polym. Environ.,
002, 10, 49–52.
1 Z. S. Petrovic, A. Guo, I. Javni, I. Cvetkovi and D. P. Hong, Polym.
Int., 2008, 57, 275–281.
2 P. Tran, D. Graiver and R. Narayan, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 2005,
82, 653–659.
2
Fig. 15 SEC traces of TCFAD (red), ICFAD (black), PU obtained by
◦
polyaddition of ICFAD with IPDA at 110 C (green) and PU obtained
13 M. Ionescu, Z. S. Petrovi c´ and X. Wan, J. Polym. Environ., 2007, 15,
◦
237–243.
by polyaddition of TCFAD with IPDA at 110 C (blue). Solvent: THF;
1
1
1
4 S. Gryglewicz, W. Piechocki and G. Gryglewicz, Bioresour. Technol.,
003, 87, 35–39.
5 L. Hojabri, X. Kong and S. S. Narine, Biomacromolecules, 2009, 10,
84–891.
PS calibration.
2
8
6 D. V. Palaskar, A. Boyer, E. Cloutet, C. Alfos and H. Cramail,
Biomacromolecules, 2010, 11, 1202–1211.
Thermo-mechanical analysis of PU samples. The linear PUs
were analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). All
17 US Pat., 6 120 905, 2006.
8 US pat., 6 120 905, 2000.
1
samples exhibit one glass transition temperature, T
g
, ranging
from -25 C to -13 C. PUs obtained from ICFAD exhibit a
that is systematically lower than that of PUs from TCFAD,
a phenomenon explained by the slightly lower molecular weight
◦
◦
19 H. Tomita, F. Sanda and T. Endo, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym.
Chem., 2001, 39, 162–168.
T
g
2
0 G. Rokicki and A. Piotrowska, Polymer, 2002, 43, 2927–2935.
21 B. Tamami, S. Sohn and G. L. Wilkes, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2004, 92,
83–891.
2 K. M. Doll and S. Z. Erhan, J. Agric. Food Chem., 2005, 53, 9608–
614.
8
of these PUs but also by the presence of pendant chains (C
which can act as plasticisers.
8
17
H )
2
9
As expected, the T
g
of all these linear PUs are lower than
23 K. M. Doll and S. Z. Erhan, Green Chem., 2005, 7, 849–854.
24 P. G. Parzuchowski, M. Jurczyk-Kowalska, J. Ryszkowska and G.
Rokicki, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2006, 102, 2904–2914.
those of cross-linked soy-based PUs obtained from carbonated
◦
39
triglycerides and EDA, that display a T around 20 C.
g
2
5 B. M. C. Soares, F. M. C. Gamarra, L. C. Paviani, L. A. G. Gon c¸ alves
and F. A. Cabral, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 2007, 43, 25–31.
2
2
6 G. Madras, Fluid Phase Equilib., 2004, 220, 167–169.
Conclusions
7 G. Madras, C. Kulkarni and J. Modak, Fluid Phase Equilib., 2003,
2
09, 207–213.
In this study, novel linear polyurethanes were synthesized by
bulk polyaddition of diamines with vegetable-based biscarbon-
ates, namely ICFAD and TCFAD, produced from oleic acid
methyl ester. ICFAD and TCFAD were obtained by the reaction
2
8 V. Vasconcellos and F. Cabral, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 2001, 78, 827–
8
29.
29 H. Sovov a´ , M. Zarev u´ cka, M. Vacek and K. Str a´ nsk y´ , J. Supercrit.
Fluids, 2001, 20, 15–28.
3
3
0 J.-N. Jaubert, P. Borg, L. Coniglio and D. Barth, J. Supercrit. Fluids,
001, 20, 145–155.
1 U. Guclu and F. Temelli, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2000, 39, 4756–4766.
of their epoxide precursors (IEFAD and TEFAD) with CO
phase behavior of the EFAD/CO mixtures was first studied
with respect to temperature (70–110 C) and pressure (5–20
2
. The
2
2
◦
32 Fr. Pat., 09 58219, 2010.
2
212 | Green Chem., 2010, 12, 2205–2213
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010