A R T I C L E S
Il’ichev et al.
Scheme 1. Phototautomerization of 2-Nitrotoluene
man-Harris apodization function, Mertz phase correction, zero-filling
factor of 4) gave a set of IR difference spectra (post-flash minus pre-
flash absorbance) at varying delay times, which was subjected to factor
analysis. A few significant factors (usually 2) were generally sufficient
to reproduce the time evolution of the spectra within experimental
accuracy. This procedure resulted in a substantial reduction of noise.
Mono- or biexponential decay functions, as required, were fitted to
the reduced set of spectra so obtained. The temperature in the sample
compartment was 30 °C during operation. Fast-scan spectra for
transients with a lifetime exceeding 100 ms were recorded on standing
solutions of 100-500 µm path length after exposing the sample to one
or several laser flashes.
phototautomerization of parent 2-nitrotoluene (Scheme 1) to
identify the elementary steps of the thermal back reaction in
8
aqueous solution as a benchmark. In a forthcoming paper, we
9
will discuss the photoreactions of 2-nitrobenzyl alcohols.
Materials. Doubly distilled water was used to prepare aqueous
solutions. All other solvents were of spectroscopic grade and were used
as received. The absorbance of the neat solvents at 248 nm was less
than 0.01 at 1-cm path length. Ethers 1 and 2 were synthesized by
methylation of the corresponding alcohols with dimethyl sulfate using
phase transfer catalysis.1
Molecular Probes.
3-15
Caged ATP (3) was purchased from
Experimental Section
Methods. Reaction quantum yields were determined by spectro-
photometric monitoring of the absorbance changes. A medium-pressure
mercury lamp equipped with a 365-nm band-pass filter was used as a
light source. Actinometry was done with a solution of azobenzene in
-Nitrosobenzaldehyde (4):16 A solution of anthranil (3 g, 25.2
mmol) in aqueous HCl (37 g, 23%) was cooled to -20 °C. Powdered
NaNO (1.75 g, 25.3 mmol) was added in small portions. The resulting
yellow-brown slurry was stirred for 20 min at -20 °C and filtered.
The solid was washed with cold aqueous HCl (6 mL, 23%) and water,
and redissolved in 10 mL of 2 M NaOH at 0 °C. Insoluble material
was removed by filtration and the filtrate was added to a cold solution
2
2
1
0
methanol.
The nanosecond kinetic and spectroscopic laser flash photolysis setup
was of standard design. An excimer laser operated mostly on KrF (248
nm), but also on XeCl (308 nm) or XeF (351 nm), was used as an
excitation source with a pulse duration of about 25 ns and pulse energies
of <200 mJ. Neither degassing nor changing the excitation wavelength
had a noticeable effect on the transient intermediates. Therefore, most
measurements were done with aerated solutions. All kinetic measure-
ments with aqueous solutions were done at ambient temperatures (23
of 4 mL of concentrated H
The resulting brown suspension was stirred at 0 °C for 3 h and filtered.
The brown solid was washed with 5 mL of aqueous Na CO (5%),
copiously with cold water, and dissolved in CHCl (20 mL). Addition
2 4
SO in 75 mL water with vigorous stirring.
2
3
3
of 10 mL petrol ether, bp 60-70 °C, precipitated brown flakes, which
were removed by filtration. The green filtrate was shaken with 2%
(
2 °C) and at ionic strength I ) 0.1 M, which was adjusted by addition
of NaClO . Consequently, all the equilibrium constants so determined
are molar concentration quotients, K , for I ) 0.1 M. Transients with
3
aqueous NaHCO , washed, evaporated to 5 mL and slowly cooled to
4
-
40 °C. 2-Nitrosobenzaldehyde (0.35 g, 2.52 mmol, 10.3% yield)
16
1
c
crystallized as bushy needles, mp 110 (113-113.5) °C. H NMR (300
lifetimes exceeding 1 ms were measured on a conventional kinetic flash
apparatus with a thermostated sample cell (25.0 ( 0.1 °C) using a
discharge flashlamp (e1000 J) for excitation.
The picosecond pump-probe setup has been described.11 Solutions
with an absorbance of 0.5 (1 mm path length) were circulated in a
flow system, pumped at 248 nm (4 mJ, 0.7 ps half-width, 10 Hz) and
probed by a delayed continuum pulse (310-700 nm) of the same
duration. Transient absorption spectra were recorded at ca. 50 different
time delays ranging from 2 ps to 1.8 ns relative to the excitation pulse
and subjected to factor analysis.
The step-scan instrument was built by the design of R o¨ dig and
Siebert12 using a Bruker IFS 66v/s Fourier transform infrared spectro-
photometer equipped with a globar IR source, a KBr beam splitter, a
nitrogen-cooled MCT detector (KV100-1-B-7/190) and an external DC-
coupled preamplifier from Kolmar Inc. (KA020-E6/MU/B). A Quantel
Brilliant W Nd:YAG laser (266 or 355 nm, pulse width 6 ns, pulse
energy e5 mJ, pulse frequency 10 Hz) was used for excitation and a
Germanium filter was positioned behind the cell to absorb the laser
beam. The spectral window was restricted to 1000-2000 cm-1 by using
a cut-on/cutoff filter combination from LOT Oriel. Solutions with an
MHz, CDCl
3
/TMS): δ ) 6.44 (dd, J
1
) 8, J
) 8, J
2
) 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (dt,
J
J
1
) 8, J
) 8, J
2
) 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (dt, J
1
2
) 0.8 Hz, 1H), 8.21 (dd,
13
1
2
) 1.3 Hz, 1H), 12.1 (s, 1H, CHO). C NMR (75 MHz,
3
CDCl ): δ ) 193.3, 162.0, 136.5, 134.0, 132.7, 127.7, 106.5 ppm.
MS (EI) m/e (relative intensity): 50 (44), 51 (98), 52 (34), 62 (6), 63
(
(
[
(
18), 64 (28), 74 (22), 75 (14), 76 (27), 77 (100), 78 (9), 79 (43), 91
50), 90 (8), 104 (3), 135 (61). UV/Vis (H O, 2%THF), λmax/nm (log
2
-1
-1
ꢀ/M cm ]) 238 (4.05), 287 (3.78 ( 0.02), 310 (3.73 ( 0.03), 750
1.34 ( 0.04).
Calculations. Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations were
17
performed with the GAUSSIAN 98 package of programs. We used
the B3LYP hybrid functional, which combines Becke’s three-parameter
18
19
exchange functional with the Lee-Yang-Parr correlation functional
20
in a slightly modified form. Geometries were optimized using the
B3LYP functional with the 6-31G(d) and 6-31+G(d) basis sets for
(
13) Seebach, D.; Kalinowski, H.-O.; Bastani, B.; Crass, G.; Daum, H.; D o¨ rr,
H.; DuPreez, N. P.; Ehrig, V.; Langer, W.; N u¨ ssler, C.; Oei, H.-A.; Schmidt,
M. HelV. Chim. Acta 1977, 60, 301-325.
(
14) Merz, A. Angew. Chem. 1973, 85, 868-869.
(15) Gonzalez, M. A.; Meyers, A. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 47-55.
(
(
16) Bamberger, E.; Fodor, A. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1910, 43, 3321-3335.
17) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M.
A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann,
R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin,
K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi,
R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.;
Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Rega, N.; Salvador,
P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.;
Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov, B.
B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin,
R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara,
A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M.
W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.;. Replogle, E. S.; Pople,
J. A. Gaussian 98, Revision A.11, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 2002.
optical density of 0.4 were pumped through the sample cell (CaF
2
windows, 100-µm path length) to avoid re-irradiation of transient
intermediates and photoproducts. The Fourier transformed interfero-
-
1
grams (128 accumulations, spectral resolution 8 cm , 3-term Black-
(
8) Schw o¨ rer, M.; Wirz, J. HelV. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 1441-1458.
9) Il’ichev, Y. V.; Kombarova, S. V.; Mac, M.; Schw o¨ rer, M.; Wirz, J. in
preparation.
(
(
10) Gauglitz, G.; Hubig, S. Z. Phys. Chem., N. F. 1984, 139, 237-246. Gauglitz,
G.; Hubig, S. J. Photochem. 1985, 30, 121-125. Persy, G.; Wirz, J. EPA
Newslett. 1987, 29, 45-46.
(11) Hasler, E.; H o¨ rmann, A.; Persy, G.; Platsch, H.; Wirz, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 5400-5409.
(18) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652.
(19) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785-797.
(12) R o¨ dig, C.; Siebert F. Appl. Spectrosc. 1999, 55, 893-901.
4582 J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 126, NO. 14, 2004