Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
4358 J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 50, No. 15, 2002
Krishnamachari et al.
and acidic fractions. Preparative TLC of the neutral fraction yielded
the heptamethyl derivative.
Methylation of Depside (4). To a solution of 4 (25 mg, 82 µmol)
in acetone, K2CO3 (46 mg, 4 equiv) and dimethyl sulfate (5 equiv, 38
µL) were added, and the resulting mixture was refluxed for 8 h. The
crude pentamethyl derivative obtained was purified by Sephadex LH-
20 (40 cm × 2 cm) eluted with methanol.
1H and 13C NMR Spectroscopy. 1H, 13C, and 2D 1H-13C correlated
NMR spectra were obtained in DMSO-d6/CD3CN/CD3OD using a
Bruker DRX 500 MHz instrument, operating at 500 MHz (1H) and
125 MHz (13C).
LC-MS. Analyses were performed on a Thermo Separation
Products HPLC system coupled with a photodiode array (PDA) detector
and a Thermo Finnigan (San Jose, CA) LCQ deca mass spectrometer
in sequence. A 250 × 2.1 mm i.d., 5 µm Altima C18 column (Alltech)
was used for separation using the same mobile phase gradient program
described in the product quantification section. Trifluoroacetic acid
(0.1%) or formic acid (1%) was used as a mobile phase modifier to
facilitate ionization. A flow rate of 0.2 mL/min was used and directly
directed to a PDA detector, then to a quadrupole ion trap mass
spectrometer via an electron spray ionization or atmospheric pressure
chemical ionization (APCI) interface. The mass spectrometer was
operated in a negative mode; MS/MS was performed as needed.
Compound 2. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz): 5.89 (d, J ) 2 Hz,
1H, H-6), 5.94 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 1H, H-8), 6.79 (d, J ) 8 Hz, 1H, H-5′),
7.53-7.55 (m, 2H, H-2′ and H-6′), 8.62 (s, 1H, OH), 9.37 (s, 1H, OH),
9.98 (s, 1H, OH), 10.79 (s, 1H, OH), 10.85 (s, 1H, OH).
13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz): 90.34 (C-8), 96.56 (C-6), 100.47
(C-4a), 104.57 (C-3), 114.89 (C-5′), 117.33 (C-2′), 123.82 (C-6′), 124.99
(C-1′), 144.73 (C-3′), 151.36 (C-4′), 158.53 (C-8a), 168.46 (C-5), 171.86
(C-7), 189.87 (C-4), 190.24 (C-2).
Compound 2b (water adduct). 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz): 0.96
(t, J ) 7 Hz, 3H, CH3), 3.25-3.31 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.37-3.42 (m, 1H,
CH2), 5.96 (d, J ) 2.5 Hz, 1H, H-6/H-8), 5.97 (d, J ) 2.5 Hz, H-8/
H-6), 6.78 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-5′), 7.02 (dd, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2.5 Hz,
1H, H-6′), 7.14 (d, J ) 2.5 Hz, 1H, H-2′).
Figure 1. Quercetin (1) and oxidized products generated from the reaction
of 1 with the radical generator AIBN.
13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz): 15.31 (CH3), 59.92 (CH2), 95.08
(C-3), 97.06 (C-6/C-8), 97.44 (C-8/C-6), 101.31 (C-4a), 107.56 (C-2),
115.24 (C-5′), 117.49 (C-2′), 121.84 (C-6′), 127.05 (C-1′), 145.41 (C-
3′), 147.18 (C-4′), 160.45 (C-8a), 165.16 (C-5), 168.70 (C-7), 194.14
(C-4).
The TLC conditions were CHCl3/MeOH/HOAc in the ratio of 75:
25:0.1 or 80:20:0.1.
Modified Oxidation Conditions. Quercetin (100 mg, 0.3 mmol)
was dissolved in a fixed volume of 250 mL and varied ratios of
acetonitrile/methanol/ethanol/concentrated HCl. To this solution AIBN
(984 mg, 6.0 mmol, 20 equiv) was added, and the reaction mixture
was stirred at 60 °C for 3 h. Differences in the reaction mixtures are
noted as follows. For condition 2 (low pH) 100 µL of concentrated
HCl was added to a solution of quercetin in acetonitrile (250 mL). For
condition 3 (external nucleophile) 10 mL of MeOH was added to the
solution of quercetin in acetonitrile (240 mL). For condition 4 (low
pH with external nucleophile) 100 µL of concentrated HCl was added
to a solution of quercetin in acetonitrile (240 mL) and methanol (10
mL). For condition 5 (low pH with external nucleophile) 100 µL of
concentrated HCl was added to a solution of quercetin in acetonitrile
(240 mL) and ethanol (10 mL).
Product Quantification and Data Analysis. The oxidized products
were quantified by a Hewlett-Packard 1100 series HPLC system
equipped with a 250 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 µm (Alltech) Econosphere C18
column and variable wavelength UV detector. A 2-mg aliquot of
4-hydroxybenzoic acid as an internal standard (ISTD) was added to
reaction mixtures at the end of the reaction. The components of the
reaction mixture (10 µL) were eluted with water containing 0.1% CF3-
COOH/MeOH (v/v) gradient and detected at 254 nm. The mobile phase
gradient program started with 40% methanol was maintained at 40%
for 15 min, increased linearly to 80% within 25 min, and kept at 80%
for another 10 min. The flow rate was set to 0.5 mL/min. Analysis of
variance procedure was run using SAS statistical software (5). Means
were separated using Tukey’s mean separation method at a P value
less than 0.05.
Compound 3. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz): 2.06 (s, OH), 5.97
(bs, 2H, H-6, H-8), 6.19 (d, 1H, J ) 2 Hz, H-8/H-6), 6.46 (d, 1H, J )
2 Hz, H-6/H-8), 6.68 (dd, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2.5 Hz, 1H, H-6′), 6.92 (d, J )
8.5 Hz, 1H, H-5′), 7.14 (bs, 1H, H-2′), 7.26 (d, J ) 9 Hz, 1H, H-5′),
7.79 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 7.85 (dd, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2 Hz, 1H, H-6′),
8.92 (s, OH), 9.16 (s, OH), 9.29 (s, OH), 9.70 (s, OH), 10.85 (s, OH),
11.14 (s, OH), 12.36 (s, OH). (Tentative assignments based on 1H-1H
COSY, HMQC, HMBC, and ROESY spectra in comparison with
quercetin.)
13C NMR (CD3CN, 125 MHz) (tentative assignments based on 1H-
1H COSY, HMQC, HMBC, and ROESY spectra in comparison with
quercetin.): 91.16 (C-3), 94.82 (C-8), 97.50 (C-8*), 98.28 (C-6*), 99.25
(C-6), 100.88 (C-4a), 101.43 (C-2), 104.39 (C-4a*), 115.80 (C-5′),
116.20 (C-2′), 117.60 (C-2′*), 118.30 (C-5′*), 121.50 (C-6′), 123.70
(C-6′*), 126.26 (C-1′), 127.09 (C-1′*), 137.43 (C-3), 141.46 (C-3′*),
142.65 (C-4′*), 144.97 (C-3′), 145.22 (C-2), 147.31 (C-4′), 157.79 (C-
8a), 160.59 (C-8a*), 162.01 (C-5), 164.73 (C-7), 165.06 (C-5), 168.90
(C-7*), 176.51 (C-4), 188.62 (C-4*).
1
Heptamethyl Derivative of 3. H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): 3.78
(bs, 3H, OCH3), 3.82 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.86 (s, 6H,
2 OCH3), 3.87 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.89 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.11 (d, J ) 2 Hz,
1H, H-6), 6.16 (bs, 1H, H-8), 6.35 (d, J ) 2.5 Hz, 1H, H-6), 6.43 (d,
J ) 2.5 Hz, 1H, H-8), 6.79 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 1H, H-5′), 7.19 (d, J ) 8
Hz, 1H, H-5′*), 7.28 (dd, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2 Hz, 1H, H-6′), 7.35 (d, J )
2.5 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 7.85-7.87 (m, 2H, H-2′*, H-6′*).
Compound 4. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz): 100.99 (C-4a),
101.73 (C-8), 104.62 (C-6), 116.19 (C-5′), 118.06 (C-2′), 122.39 (C-
1′), 124.39 (C-6′), 145.56 (C-3′), 151.33 (C-4′), 154.64 (C-8a), 164.15
(C-7), 166.07 (C-2), 166.11 (C-5), 172.79 (C-4). ESI-MS (negative
mode): 304.9 (M+ - 1), 168.9 (M+ - C6H5(OH)2CO).
Methylation of Dimer (3). To a solution of dimer (3) (50 mg, 83
µmol) in methanol, an excess of diazomethane (ca. 16 mmol) in ether
was added, and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir overnight. The
crude reaction mixture was then fractionated using NaOH into neutral