11038
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 118, No. 24, 22 June 2003
Baek et al.
are systematically measured here to give an interesting mode
dependence of the lifetime. Lifetimes of states with the
CH3-rocking mode excited are longer than those of isoener-
getic ND2-wagging modes. Multidimensional potential en-
ergy surfaces near the reaction barrier along the N–H͑D͒
reaction coordinate would be extremely helpful for a better
understanding of these interesting experimental facts in re-
gard to mode-dependent lifetimes. In conclusion, quantum
states of CH3NH2 and CH3ND2 in their first-excited states
are clearly characterized in this work. Since the excited mol-
ecule predissociates, methylamine serves as an excellent
model system for state-to-state reaction dynamics studies.
The effect of initial quantum reactant states on the reaction
outcome is an always-stimulating subject. Thus more dynam-
ics studies along this direction with theoretical calculations
are needed.
faces including amino wagging or CH3 rocking would be
desirable.
It is also interesting to note that, within the Born–
Oppenheimer approximation, the zero-point energy differ-
ence between CH3NH2 and CH3ND2 in the excited state
͑⌬ZPEЈ͒ is calculated to be 1018 cmϪ1 and this is much
smaller than that of 1387 cmϪ1 for the ground electronic
state ͑⌬ZPEЉ͒. The latter is from experimental values,21
while the former is calculated from the latter and origin en-
ergies of CH3NH2 and CH ND : ⌬ZPE ϭT (CH NH )
Ј
3
2
00
3
2
ϩ⌬ZPE ϪT (CH ND ) ϭ 41 669 ϩ1387Ϫ42 038 ϭ1018.
Љ
00
3
2
This huge difference between ⌬ZPEЈ and ⌬ZPEЉ is quite
rare, since the NH2 /ND2 substitution would affect the zero-
point energies almost equally for the ground and excited
states. Therefore, this indicates that potential energy surfaces
especially along N–H͑D͒ stretching coordinates are quite an-
harmonic in the excited state compared to those in the
ground state. That is, the more anharmonic excited potential
energy surface gives the lower zero-point N–H͑D͒ stretching
frequency, resulting in a decrease of the zero-point energy
difference between CH3NH2 and CH3ND2 . This anharmo-
nicity should come from severe coupling of the 3s–n Ryd-
berg state and repulsive valence state along the N–H͑D͒ dis-
sociation coordinate. Detailed ab initio calculations of the
coupling region of Rydberg and valence states would be de-
sirable for a quantitative explanation of this interesting ex-
perimental observation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was financially supported by Korea Research
Foundation Grant No. KRF-2002-070-C00046. The discus-
sion with Professor W. H. Miller at UC Berkeley was very
brief, but very helpful.
1 J. V. Michael and W. A. Noyes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 1228 ͑1963͒.
2 E. P. Gardner and J. R. McNesby, J. Phys. Chem. 86, 2646 ͑1982͒.
3 H. K. Haak and F. Stuhl, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 3627 ͑1984͒.
4 G. C. G. Waschewsky, D. C. Kitchen, P. W. Browning, and L. J. Butler, J.
Phys. Chem. 99, 2635 ͑1995͒.
5 C. L. Reed, M. Kono, and M. N. R. Ashfold, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
Trans. 92, 4897 ͑1996͒.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
6 M. N. R. Ashfold, R. N. Dixon, M. Kono, D. H. Mordaunt, and C. L.
Reed, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 355, 1659 ͑1997͒.
7 T.-X. Xiang and W. A. Guillory, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 2019 ͑1986͒.
8 K. M. Dunn and K. Morokuma, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 123 ͑1996͒.
9 A. Bach, J. M. Hutchison, R. J. Holiday, and F. F. Crim, J. Chem. Phys.
116, 9315 ͑2002͒.
Here rovibrational structures and dynamics of methy-
lamines (CH3NH2 and CH3ND2) in predissociative A states
˜
(3s–n) are revealed through ͑1ϩ1͒ resonant-enhanced two-
photon ionization spectroscopy. Spectral origins are accu-
rately and precisely determined through the simulation to be
41 669 and 42 038 cmϪ1 for CH3NH2 and CH3ND2 , respec-
tively. The amino group which is bent in the ground elec-
tronic state becomes planar in the excited methylamine. Due
to this geometrical change upon electronic excitation, amino-
wagging and CH3-rocking modes are found to be optically
active, giving their respective fundamental frequencies of
636 ͑487͒ and 1008 ͑1012͒ cmϪ1 for CH3NH2 (CH3ND2). In
the excited state, CH3 rotates nearly freely about the C–N
10 D. H. Mordaunt, M. N. R. Ashfold, and R. N. Dixon, J. Chem. Phys. 109,
7659 ͑1998͒.
11 J. Biesner, L. Schnieder, J. Schmeer, G. Ahlers, X. Xie, K. H. Welge,
M. N. R. Ashfold, and R. N. Dixon, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 3607 ͑1988͒.
12 J. Biesner, L. Schnieder, G. Ahlers, X. Xie, K. H. Welge, M. N. R. Ash-
fold, and R. N. Dixon, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 2901 ͑1989͒.
13 L. D. Ziegler, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 664 ͑1985͒.
14 S. A. Henck, M. A. Mason, W.-B. Yan, K. K. Lehmann, and S. L. Coy, J.
Chem. Phys. 102, 4772 ͑1995͒; 102, 4783 ͑1995͒.
15 A. Nakajima, K. Fuke, K. Tsukamoto, Y. Yoshida, and K. Kaya, J. Phys.
Chem. 95, 571 ͑1991͒.
16 M. Kreglewski, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 72, 1 ͑1978͒.
˜
axis with respect to NH2(ND2). For CH3ND2 (A), torsional
17 N. Ohashi and J. T. Hougen, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 121, 474 ͑1987͒.
18 N. Ohashi, K. Takagi, J. T. Hougen, W. B. Olson, and W. J. Lafferty, J.
Mol. Spectrosc. 132, 242 ͑1988͒.
barriers of 5 and 19 cmϪ1 are accurately determined for the
zero-point and first amino-wagging levels, respectively,
through the simulation using the internal-rotor Hamiltonian
with a sixfold potential function. Lifetimes of quantum states
in excited methylamines are estimated from spectral line-
widths to give ϳ8.8 and ϳ0.38 ps for zero-point levels of
CH3ND2 and CH3NH2 , respectively. The huge NH2 /ND2
isotopic substitution effect on the excited-state lifetime
strongly indicates that the primary dissociation channel of
excited methylamine is the N–H͑D͒ bond dissociation and it
proceeds via tunneling through a reaction barrier at least at
low vibrational energies. At the vibrational energy of ϳ1000
cmϪ1, the lifetime of CH3ND2 suddenly drops to 1.8 ps,
suggesting a comparable reaction barrier height along the
N–D reaction coordinate. Lifetimes of excited methylamines
19 D. Kivelson, J. Chem. Phys. 27, 353 ͑1957͒.
20 M. Kreglewski, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 133, 10 ͑1989͒.
21 A. P. Gray and R. C. Lord, J. Chem. Phys. 26, 690 ͑1957͒.
22 M. Oda, N. Ohashi, and J. T. Hougen, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 142, 57 ͑1990͒,
and references therein.
23 K. Shimoda, T. Nishikawa, and T. Itoh, J. Chem. Phys. 22, 1456 ͑1954͒.
24
¨
T. Forster and J. C. Jurgens, Z. Phys. Chem. Abt. B 36, 387 ͑1937͒.
25 E. Tannenbaum, E. M. Coffin, and A. J. Harrison, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 311
͑1953͒.
26 M. Tsuboi, A. Y. Hirakawa, and H. Kawashima, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 29, 216
͑1969͒.
27 M. Tsuboi and A. Y. Yirakawa, Can. J. Phys. 60, 844 ͑1982͒.
28 D. P. Taylor and E. R. Bernstein, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 10453 ͑1995͒.
29 D. P. Taylor, C. F. Dion, and E. R. Bernstein, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 3512
͑1997͒.
30 M.-J. Hubin-Franskin, J. Delwiche, A. Giuliani, M.-P. Ska, F. Motte-