W. Zheng et al.
IV
MCM-41, have been employed to incorporate the Sn
by the oxygenate groups on the GO layer, forming uniform
loading of SnO NPs on GO sheets. It has proved that SnO
species [2, 12, 13]. The mesoporous matrix indeed allowed
for the free diffusion of regents, but the amorphous struc-
IV
2
2
NPs were kept small in size and dispersed uniformly on the
ture of silica wall often incorporates Sn species disor-
GO sheets. The resultant SnO /GO nanocomposites were
2
IV
derly. As a result, not all Sn centers were equally active
demonstrated the efficient and selective solid Lewis acid
catalysts for B–V oxidation with H O . Quantitative yield
and/or accessible to the reactants for efficient B–V oxida-
tion [14–16]. Recently, layered double hydroxides (LDHs),
a class of two-dimensional anionic clays, have emerged as
2
2
of lactones was obtained within 2 h even in the case of
bulky 2-adamantanone. Furthermore, the catalyst could be
easily separated for reuse by centrifugation.
IV
the alternative support for Sn species through ion-ex-
II
change [17, 18]. The key structural characteristic that M
III
and M cations were distributed in a uniform manner in
IV
the hydroxide layers resulted in the formation of Sn /LDH
2 Experimental
with specific morphology/surface structure and high dis-
persion [19]. Furthermore, ‘flexible’ interlayer spaces of
IV
2.1 Materials and Methods
the layered Sn /LDH catalyst not only fitted substrates
IV
either bulky or less, but also allowed the free access of Sn
Cyclopentanone and high-purity graphite (99.9999 %,
200 mesh) were purchased from Alfa Aesar. Cyclohex-
anone and adamantanone were obtained by J&K. Other
commercially available chemicals were laboratory grade
reagents from local suppliers. All of the solvents were
purified by standard procedures.
center during reaction. It thus represented a fascinating
strategy for developing highly efficient and stable Tin-
based catalysts for B–V oxidation with H O .
2
2
Graphene, a novel layered carbon material with a tight
packing of honeycomb lattice, has become one of the rising
stars in material science [20]. Its intriguing properties, such
as unique layered structure, high surface area, high flexi-
bility and mechanical strength, made it very attractive in
heterogeneous catalysis [21–24]. Although many SnO2/-
graphene nanocomposites have been recently proposed as
an anode material for Li-ion batteries [25–28], the
Surface structure of the samples was measured using a
TEM (JEOL JEM-3010). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns
were recorded on a Philips X’PERT-Pro-MPD diffrac-
˚
tometer using Cu Ka radiation (k = 1.542 A). A continu-
o
o
ous scan mode was used to collect the 2h from 5 to 80 .
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) data were
obtained with an ESCALab220i-XL electron spectrometer
from VG Scientific using 300 W Al Ka radiation. The base
employment of SnO /graphene nanocomposites in catalysis
2
was scarcely reported. For higher catalytic performance, it
was desirable to have smaller particle size and higher
-
7
pressure was about 3 9 10 Pa. SnO NPs contents were
2
dispersion of SnO NPs in the composite. However, it was
2
analyzed by TGA using a NETZSCH STA 449C thermal
difficult to control the dispersion state of loaded NPs on
graphene surfaces, mainly due to the lack of strong inter-
actions between them [29]. Furthermore, layer graphene
sheets tended to stack with each other in solution, thus
losing their high surface area and intrinsic chemical and
physical properties. An ideal solution to above problems
analyzer. Samples (ca. 0.01 g) were heated from room
o
temperature up to 800 C with 10 K/min under air flow
using alumina sample holders. Thin layer chromatography
(TLC) was conducted on glass plates coated with silica gel
GF254. The conversion and ee values were measured by a
6890 N gas chromatograph (Agilent Co.) equipped with a
capillary column (HP19091G-B213, 30 m 9 0.32 mm 9
0.25 lm).
was supporting SnO NPs on a graphene oxide (GO) sheet
2
instead of a graphene sheet. Different from graphene, GO
sheet consisted of intact graphitic regions interspersed with
3
sp -hybridized carbons containing carboxyl, hydroxyl, and
2.2 Preparation of SnO (x)/GO (Where x is
2
epoxide functional groups on the edge, top, and bottom
surface of each sheet. The abundant surface oxygenated
the Mass Ratio of SnO NPs)
2
functional groups ensured GO to grip SnO NPs tight on
2
GO was prepared by the oxidation of high-purity graphite
powder (99.9999 %, 200 mesh) with H SO /KMnO
4
the surface through electrostatic interactions, which pre-
2
4
vented not only the aggregation of SnO NPs, but also the
2
according to the Hummers method [30], and then was
subjected to dialysis for 7 days to completely remove metal
ions and acids. The resulting product was dried at room
temperature under vacuum overnight, giving GO as yel-
lowish-brown powder. FT-IR (KBr): 3187, 3132, 1735,
aggregation of graphene sheets. In addition, all the SnO2
NPs located on the GO surface were exposed to the
reagents in catalysis, which may further enhance the cat-
alytic efficiency of SnO /GO nanocomposites.
2
-
1
Herein, SnO NPs were grown on the GO surfaces via a
2
1621, 1224, 1050 and 581 cm .
hydrothermal method using SnCl Á5H O as a metal pre-
The dried GO (1.0 g) was sonicated in deionized water
(100 mL) for 0.5 h to ensure most GO being fully exfoliated.
4
2
cursor. Then SnO NPs were formed, in situ, and anchored
2
1
23