S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 968 (2010) 13–18
17
Table 4
Bond lengths and photochemical properties for 1 and related spiropyran compounds.
C
spiro–O (Å)
C
spiro–N (Å)
Colorability = (A
0
/cL); (solvent, T)
k
T
4
ꢁ1
ꢁ1
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.458
1.434
1.437
1.443
1.421
1.402
1.409
4916 (THF, ꢁ30°) 700 (toluene, 25°) [28]
8995 (THF, ꢁ30°) 3700 (toluene, 25°) [28]
1.11 ꢀ 10ꢁ
s
s
(THF, ꢁ30°) 1.8 s (toluene, 25°) [26]
1.454a
a
a
1.85 ꢀ 10
ꢁ4 ꢁ1
(THF, ꢁ30°) 6.5 s (toluene, 25°) [28]
ꢁ1
1.437a
1.469 [26]
1.422 [27]
1.430 [27]
0
b
–
ꢁ
1
2300 (toluene, 25°) [29]
76 s (toluene, 25°) [30]
b
0
0
–
–
b
a
Calculated using DFT for the most stable isomer (Table 3).
Not photochromic.
b
ported value 1.421 Å for the related thiazolidinic spiropyran 4 and
also longer than those found for the benzothiazolinic spirooxazines
wavelength-dependent quantum yields for photochemical ring
opening.
5
1
and 6 (Table 3). Calculated bond lengths for Cspiro–N in benzo-
thiazolinic spiropyrans 2 and 3 are close to that observed for 1. Ta-
4
. Conclusions
ken together, bond lengths in all six compounds are significantly
3
3
shorter than C(sp )–N(sp ) bond lengths found in five-membered
heterocycles. A shorter Cspiro–N bond is an indication of donation
of lone pair electrons from N to Cspiro, which would stabilize the
cation that develops on Cspiro when the compound is in the open
form. There does not appear to be a correlation between Cspiro
bond length and either photochromism or the extent of photo-
colorability for the series of compounds 1–6 (Table 4). It is possible,
however, that the uncertainty of the calculated Cspiro–N bond
lengths in the spirooxazines masks any trend that may exist.
Few crystallographic studies have been published for this sub-
1
class of benzothiazolinic spiropyrans, and no crystal structure of
the closed form of any benzothiazolinic spiropyran has been re-
ported. Therefore, correlations between experimental molecular
geometry and photochromism or the degree of photocolorability
for this subclass of spiropyrans are not yet well substantiated. In
this work, we confirm that for benzothiazolinic or thiazolidinic spi-
ropyrans and spirooxazines, the crystallographic bond distances
such as Cspiro–O can be used as an indicator of photochromism,
but not for the degree of photocolorability. Moreover, for com-
pounds such as these, the crystal structure and the computational
results are similar for Cspiro–O bonds. Therefore, computation may
also serve as a useful tool to predict photochromism from ground
state structures for benzothiazolinic or thiazolidinic spiropyrans
and spirooxazines.
1
–
N
1
1
The crystallographic bond angles around the spiro carbon atom
of 1 are found to be between 106.15° and 114.01°. This distortion
from the tetrahedral angle and the short Cspiro–N
indicate that the spiro carbon possesses a degree of sp character.
The sum of the bond angles at N was found to be 348.21°, which
1
bond length
2
1
3
lies between the sum for sp hybridized bond angles (327°) and the
2
sum for sp hybridized bond angles (360°). The sum of the bond
angles, as well as the shorter Cspiro–N distance described above,
2
indicates that N
1
has some sp character to stabilize a developing
Acknowledgments
positive charge on Cspiro, suggesting a possibility of thermochro-
mism. This possibility was also reported by Sun et al. [27] for their
nonphotochromic benzothiazolinic spirooxazines 5 and 6. Thermo-
chromism was not observed for 1 at room temperature, or up to
We thank Dr. Michael W. Day and Lawrence M. Henling (Cal-
tech) for performing single-crystal X-ray crystallographic studies.
Thanks to Josh Cohen for assistance in the preparation of this man-
uscript. This work was supported by a grant from the National
Institutes of Health (NIGMS MBRS S06 GM08101).
5
0 °C in isopropanol.
3.5.2. Cspiro–O bond length
As discussed in the introduction, a longer Cspiro–O bond is asso-
Appendix A. Supplementary data
ciated with photochromism in spiropyrans and spirooxazines. In
addition, for spirooxazines, this bond length correlates with the de-
gree of photocolorability. The extent to which either photochro-
mism or the degree of photocolorability of thiazolidinic and
benzothiazolinic spiropyrans and benzothiazolinic spirooxazines
may also be predicted by Cspiro–O bond length was explored using
data collected and reported for compounds 1–6.
Taking together both the crystallographic and computational
distances in Table 4, it appears that compounds with Cspiro–O bond
distances greater than or equal to 1.454 Å (4, 1, 2) are photochro-
mic, while compounds with Cspiro–O bond distances less than or
equal to 1.437 Å (3, 6, 5) are not photochromic. Within the uncer-
tainty of calculated bond Cspiro–O bond distances of up to 0.01 Å
CCDC 632419 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road, Cam-
bridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033). Supplementary data
References
[1] D. Gust, T.A. Moore, A.L. Moore, Chem. Commun. (2006) 1169.
[
2] H. Morrison (Ed.), Biological Applications of Photochemical Switches, John
Wiley and Sons, New York, 1993.
(Table 3), this cutoff is consistent with that observed for nonbenzo-
[
3] B. Feringa (Ed.), Molecular Switches, Wiley-VCH, New York, 2003.
thiazolinic or thiazolidinic spiropyrans and spirooxazines. In those
classes of photochromic compounds, Cspiro–O bond distances were
found to be greater than or equal to 1.463 Å [9]. It is interesting to
note that the extent of colorability for compounds 1–6 does not
correlate with longer Cspiro–O bonds. Clearly, many factors contrib-
ute to the colorability of a compound, including the effect of sub-
stituents on the nature of the electronic transitions that lead to
the photoexcited state, rates of thermal closure, and irradiation
[4] N.T. Lu, V.N. Nguyen, S. Kumar, A. McCurdy, J. Org. Chem. 70 (2005) 9067.
[5] G. Berkovic, V. Krongauz, V. Weiss, Chem. Rev. 100 (2000) 1741.
[
[
6] F.M. Raymo, M. Tomasulo, Chem. Eur. J. 12 (2006) 3186.
7] R.C. Bertelson, in: J.C. Crano, R.J. Guglielmetti (Eds.), Organic Photochromic and
Thermochromic Compounds, Plenum Press, New York, 1999 (Chapter 1).
[8] R.C. Bertelson, in: G.H. Brown (Ed.), Photochromism, John Wiley & Sons, New
York, 1971 (Chapter 3).
[
9] K. Nakatsu, H. Yoshioka, Kwansei Gakuin Univ. Natural Sci. Rev. 1 (1996) 21.
[
10] R. Millini, G. Del Piero, P. Allegrini, V. Malatesta, G. Castaldi, Acta Cryst. C 49
(1993) 1205.