Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
In conclusion, we discovered the first turn-on GTP fluorescent
sensor thus far from a semi-designed diversity directed sensor
approach. On the basis of this unprecedented high selectivity of
G49 to GTP and its visual green fluorescence increase, we propose
to dub this compound “GTP Green.” The details of molecular
recognition between GTP Green and GTP, structure-activity
relationships, and biological application studies are in progress.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Institutes of Health (P20GM072029). Components of this work were
conducted in a Shared Instrumentation Facility constructed with
support from Research Facilities Improvement Grant C06 RR-16572
from the NCRR/NIH.
Supporting Information Available: Complete experimental details;
spectral data for G32, G49, and precursors thereof; fluorescence
emission spectra of G32 upon addition of 16 analytes; fluorescent
titration of G32 and G49 upon GTP. This material is available free of
Figure 2. Fluorescence emission spectra (excitation ) 480 nm, cutoff )
515 nm) of G49 (1 µM) with 100 µM of GTP (green), ATP (red), all other
14 analytes and blank control (all in black) in 10 mM HEPES buffer
(pH ) 7.4) with 1% DMSO; 96-well picture was taken using 5 µM of G49
for better visualization, otherwise in the same condition, under 365 nm UV
lamp light.
References
(1) Valeur, B. Molecular Fluorescence: Principles and Applications; Wiley-
VCH: New York, 2001.
(2) (a) Lakowicz, J. R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 2nd ed.;
Kluwer Academic/Plenum: New York, 1999. (b) Czarnik, A. W.
Fluorescent Chemosensors for Ion and Molecule Recognition; American
Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1993.
(3) (a) Srinivasan, N.; Kilburn, J. D. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 305.
(b) Rurack, K.; Resch-Genger, U. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2002, 31, 116. (c)
Valeur, B.; Leray, I. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2000, 205, 3.
(4) (a) Martinez-Manez, R.; Sancenon, F. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 4419. (b)
de Silva, A. P.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Huxley, A. J.
M.; McCoy, C. P.; Rademacher, J. T.; Rice, T. E. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97,
1515.
(5) (a) Li, Q.; Lee, J. S.; Ha, C.; Park, C. B.; Yang, G.; Gan, W. B.; Chang,
Y. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6331. (b) Gao, J.; Watanabe, S.;
Kool, E. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12748. (c) Rosania, G. R.; Lee,
J. W.; Ding, L.; Yoon, H. S.; Chang, Y. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
1130. (d) Zhu, Q.; Yoon, H. S.; Parikh, P. B.; Chang, Y. T.; Yao, S. Q.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5083.
(6) Recent examples of nucleotide fluorescent detection: (a) Li, C.; Numata,
M.; Takeuchi, M.; Shinkai, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6371.
(b) Descalzo, A. B.; Marcos, M. D.; Martinez-Manez, R.; Soto, J.; Beltran,
D.; Amoros, P. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 2721. (c) Mizukami, S.; Nagano,
T.; Urano, Y.; Odani, A.; Kikuchi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3920.
(d) Ojida, A.; Park, S.; Mito-oka, Y.; Hamachi, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002,
43, 6193. (e) Sancenon, F.; Benito, A.; Lloris, J. M.; Martinez-Manez,
R.; Pardo, T.; Soto, J. HelV. Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 1505. (f) Thanh, N.;
Rathbone, D.; Billington, D.; Hartell, N. Anal. Lett. 2002, 35, 2499. (g)
Turkewitsch, P.; Wandelt, B.; Darling, G.; Powell, W. J. Photochem.
Photobiol., A 1998, 117, 199.
(7) (a) Kim, S. K.; Moon, B. S.; Park, J. H.; Seo, Y.; Koh, H. S.; Yoon, Y.
J.; Lee, K. D.; Yoon, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6617. (b) Kwon, J.
Y.; Singh, N. J.; Kim, H. N.; Kim, S. K.; Kim, K. S.; Yoon, J. Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8892. (c) McCleskey, S. C.; Griffin, M. J.;
Schneider, S. E.; McDevitt, J. T.; Anslyn, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 1114. (d) Amemiya, S.; Buhlmann, P.; Umezawa, Y. Chem. Commun.
1997, 1027.
To fully check the selectivity of the two hit compounds, all the
nucleosides (adenosine, uridine, cytidine, guanosine) and nucleotides
(XNP, where X ) A, U, C, G, and N ) mono, di, tri) were tested
systematically in a 96-well plate. High selectivity of both G49 and
G32 only to GTP was clearly exhibited without any obvious cross
response to any of other nucleotides or nucleosides (Figure 2 for
G49 and Figure S9 in Supporting Information for G32). As we
observed, G32 suffered from significant photobleaching under
strong irradiation light, so we decided to focus on G49 for further
analysis. Upon addition of GTP (100 µM) to G49 (1 µM), a red
shift for both λex (from 450 to 480 nm) and λem (from 520 to 540
nm) was observed (the full titration curve is available in Supporting
Information). When excited at 480 nm, an approximately 80-fold
fluorescence increase at an emission wavelength of 540 nm was
observed only for GTP, while only two (ATP) or fewer fold changes
were observed for all other analytes. In the same condition, dGTP
showed a little weaker (70-fold increase) but almost similar response
to that of GTP. This indicates that the 2′-hydroxyl group of GTP
is crucial for the molecular interaction with G49. The quantum
yields (Φ) of G49 before and after addition of GTP were 0.003
and 0.074, respectively.9 A visual distinction was also possible when
5 µM of G49 was used (picture in Figure 2).
The quinolinium analogues of G32 and G49 were also prepared
as control compounds, and neither of them showed any fluorescence
change in the presence of GTP. Combined with the fact that none
of the other 94 library members that originated from different
aldehyde groups showed strong fluorescent response to GTP, we
postulate that both the imidazolium and the 2-phenylindole moiety
are important for selective GTP recognition.
(8) (a) Burma, D. P. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 1988, 47, 65. (b) Pogson, C. I. Am. J.
Clin. Nutr. 1974, 27, 380.
(9) Fluorescence quantum yields were determined by reference to fluorescein
in 0.1 N NaOH (Φ ) 0.95) with excitation at 450 nm following these
references: (a) Fery-Forgues, S.; Lavabre, D. J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76,
1260. (b) Brannon, J. H.; Magde, D. J. Phys. Chem. 1978, 82, 705.
JA063733D
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 32, 2006 10381