Paper
Green Chemistry
Decarboxylation of SA was improved by using a biphasic reac-
3 S. Mathew and T. E. Abraham, Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 2004,
24, 59.
4 H. Leisch, S. Grosse, K. Morley, K. Abokitse, F. Perrin,
J. Denault and P. C. K. Lau, Green Process Synth., 2013, 2, 7.
5 H. Hatakeyama, E. Hayashi and T. Haraguchi, Polymer,
1977, 18, 759.
6 K. Krygier, F. Sosulski and L. Hogge, J. Agric. Food Chem.,
1982, 30, 334.
7 M. Naczk, R. Amarowicz, A. Sullivan and F. Shahidi, Food
Chem., 1998, 62, 489.
tion system with toluene for in situ product removal. Up to
−
1
5
0 g L of SA was decarboxylated, affording VS in 80% isolated
yield. VS was isolated in high purity via solvent extraction and
a slightly basic buffer wash to remove unreacted starting
material. Our synthesized PVS polymer exhibited slightly
higher E and H values than a commercial polystyrene polymer.
Further studies are necessary to determine if 4-hydroxystyrene
derivatives like VS and VG would be adequate substitutes for
styrene in the polymer industry.
The enzymatic decarboxylation of SA extracts from canola
meal yielded VS in good purity (90%) and an overall isolated
yield of 3.0 mg VS per g of canola meal. As the first successful
proof-of-concept for obtaining VS from canola biomass from a
8 R. Khattab, M. Eskin, M. Aliani and U. Thiyam, J. Am. Oil
Chem. Soc., 2010, 87, 147.
9 U. Wanasundrara, R. Amarowicz and F. Shahidi, J. Agric.
Food Chem., 1994, 42, 1285.
laboratory scale perspective, inevitably a few issues need to be 10 U. Thiyam, H. Stockmann, T. Z. Felde and K. Schwarz,
addressed before any large scale process can be entertained. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol., 2006, 108, 239.
Improvement of biocatalyst performance via a higher turnover 11 D. Wakamatsu, S. Morimura, T. Sawa, K. Kida, C. Nakai
rate or greater affinity toward SA, and process optimization in and H. Maeda, Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem., 2005, 69, 1568.
both extraction of SA from canola meal or recovery of VS from 12 A. Spielmeyer, A. Wagner and G. Jahreis, Food Chem., 2009,
the biphasic system are some examples. The use of a solid 112, 944.
polymer)–liquid biphasic bioreactor system is another possi- 13 H. Kuwahara, A. Kanazaqa, D. Wakamatu, S. Morimura,
2
6
(
bility. Nonetheless, the present yield of VS from canola meal is
K. Kida, T. Akaike and H. Maeda, J. Agric. Food Chem.,
2004, 52, 4380.
−
1
>
4-fold higher than VS produced (720 µg g at 160 °C) during
1
2
canola seed roasting by a domestic microwave. Although the 14 X. Cao, T. Tsukamoto, T. Seki, H. Tanaka, S. Morimura,
latter thermal method is advantageous with its short time
L. Cao, T. Mizoshita, H. Ban, T. Toyoda, H. Maeda and
period (7.5 min), our method offers an alternative value pro-
M. Tatematsu, Int. J. Cancer, 2008, 122, 1445.
position to canola seed roasting when industrial scale micro- 15 K. Nakamura, T. Hatakeyama and H. Hatakeyama, Polym.
wave equipment may not be readily available. Interestingly, as J., 1986, 18, 219.
a renewable feedstock, rapeseed oil, compared to several var- 16 R. Bernini, E. Mincione, M. Barontini, G. Provenzano and
ieties of high erucic mustard seed oil, was found to remain a
viable source for canolol production.
On protein engineering, a judicious single amino acid
L. Setti, Tetrahedron, 2007, 63, 9663.
17 A. Sharma, R. Kumar, N. Sharma, V. Kumar and
A. K. Sinha, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008, 350, 2910.
2
7
replacement was found to expand the substrate specificity of 18 P. Terpinc, T. Polak, N. Segatin, A. Hanzlowsky, N. Poklar
PAD using a semi-rational approach. This represents the sim- Ulrih and H. Abramovic, Food Chem., 2011, 128, 62.
plest case of a non-additive mutational effect in protein engi- 19 M. J. Rein, V. Ollilainen, M. Vahermo, J. Yli-Kauhaluoma
2
8
neering as recently discussed by Reetz.
and M. Heinonen, Eur. Food Res. Technol., 2005, 220, 239.
0 A. K. Sinha, A. Sharma and B. P. Joshi, Tetrahedron, 2007,
2
2
63, 960.
1 A. Matte, S. Grosse, H. Bergeron, K. Abokitse and
P. C. K. Lau, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. F: Struct. Biol. Cryst.
Commun., 2010, 66, 1407.
Acknowledgements
Funding by the Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program
of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada is gratefully acknowl-
edged. We thank Chris Corbeil and Traian Sulea for expert
help in molecular modeling. We are grateful to Chantale Beau-
lieu for GC/MS analysis and to Louise Paquet, Florence Perrin
and Johanne Denault for polymer characterization. We wish to
thank the anonymous reviewers for various constructive com-
ments about the manuscript.
1
2
2 We acknowledge that the kcat for SAD (28 s− ) is several
orders of magnitude lower than what is desirable for indus-
3
7
−1
trial scale enzymatic application (10 to 10 s ). Further
engineering of the enzyme to have a higher turnover fre-
quency or even increase its affinity for the substrate are
possible strategies that would overcome the shortcoming of
the present proof-of-concept.
2
3 We analyzed all biotransformations after 16 hours to
compare the reaction conversion in different biphasic
solvent systems. It is possible that the reaction requires a
shorter time period. This would require further evaluation
through an optimization study. Regarding solvent use,
although toluene is not a “preferred” solvent, it is “usable”
according to the Pfizer solvent selection guide (P. J. Dunn,
D. A. Perry, et al., Green Chem., 2008, 9, 31). In 2013 alone,
Notes and references
1
2
A.-M. Boudet, Phytochemistry, 2007, 68, 2722.
J. P. N. Rosazza, Z. Huang, L. Dostal, T. Volm and
B. Rousseau, J. Ind. Microbiol., 1995, 15, 457.
3
316 | Green Chem., 2013, 15, 3312–3317
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013