Mendeleev Commun., 2008, 18, 67–68
changes of trimethylene sulfide RC, measured by EPR method,
with the corresponding absorbances obtained. The oscillator
strength for this electron transition is f = 7.3×10–3. The molar
absorption coefficient and oscillator strength are rather low for
the RC of trimethylene sulfide due to low symmetry of this
electron transition.
Table 1 Quantum yields (j) of photochemical reactions of the tri-
methylene sulfide RC in Freon matrices.
a
Matrix
j436
j1/j2
Freon 11
Freon 113a
Freon 113
0.023 0.007
0.022 0.007
0.010 0.003
1/2
1/1
1/1
Photobleaching at 436 nm leads to the disappearance of the
trimethylene sulfide RC and formation of new paramagnetic
species [Figure 1(c)] in all of the Freon matrices. These species
have a triplet EPR spectrum with a binominal intensity distribu-
tion due to interaction with two magnetically equivalent protons.
The hyperfine splitting constant is a(2H) = 2.2 mT, giso » 2.003.
Some trimethylene sulfide RCs disappear after photobleaching
at 436 nm and 77 K in Freon matrices without formation of
paramagnetic species as the total quantity of paramagnetic species
in the frozen solution decreases. Thus, only 30% trimethylene
sulfide RCs react in a Freon 11 matrix, and about 50% in a
Freon 113 and Freon 113a. This indicates that the two processes,
namely, the photoinduced charge transfer, which leads to a
decrease of the integral intensity of the EPR spectra, and
the formation of the new paramagnetic species, have similar
quantum yields.
aj1 is the quantum yield of charge transfer reaction, j2 is the quantum yield
of formation of distonic RC.
pathway of trimethylene sulfide RC transformation is linked
+
·
with the formation of the distonic RC CH2CHSH CH2, where a
positive charge is localised on the sulfur atom, whereas spin
density is localised on the methylene group. DFT calculations
give the values of hyperfine splittings on two protons a(2H) =
= 2.1–2.4 mT, that is in accordance with the one observed
experimentally [Figure 1(c)]. Thus, the results of quantum
chemical calculations show that thioformaldehyde RC complexes
+
·
with ethylene molecules (2) or the distonic RC CH2CHSH CH2
could be formed (4), considering hyperfine splitting constants.
The quantum yields of trimethylene sulfide RC transforma-
tion in the Freon matrices are low (Table 1). The variation
in the nature of the Freon matrix has little influence on the
efficiency and products of the photochemical reactions of the
trimethylene sulfide RC.
The fact that we have not observed the formation of the
complexes of thioformaldehyde RC with ethylene molecules
from non-relaxed RC ( Ip » 3.2 eV) immediately after X-ray
irradiation and that we also have not observed any influence
of the Freon matrix nature on the quantum yields (j2) of the
photochemical reactions allowed us to consider reaction (4)
+
+
·
·
·
·
·
cyclo-C3H6S ® H2CS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
+
+
·
cyclo-C3H6S ® [H2CS ···H2C=CH2]
+
+
·
cyclo-C3H6S ® [cyclo-C2H3S–Me]
+
+
·
cyclo-C3H6S ® CH2CHSH CH2
Several reaction paths for photobleaching of trimethylene
sulfide RC are feasible. The first is accompanied by the forma-
tion of thioformaldehyde RC and molecule of ethylene. In this
case, either RCs of thioformaldehyde (1) or their complexes with
ethylene molecules (2) could be stabilised. Quantum chemical
calculations by the DFT method give the hyperfine splitting
constant a(2H) = 5.4 mT for thioformaldehyde RC, which is not
consistent with one observed experimentally. The quantum-
chemical calculations show that such a structure of complex RC
of thioformaldehyde with ethylene molecules could be realised
for which aiso(2H) » 2.3–2.4 mT. Another path of trimethylene
sulfide RC transformation could be connected with an isomeri-
zation into propylene sulfide RC (3). However, the experi-
mental EPR spectrum of propylene sulfide RC [a(3H) = 1.6 mT,
aMe(H) £ 0.3 mT] [Figure 1(c)] differs from that observed after
photobleaching the trimethylene sulfide RC. The last possible
the most probable to occur [reaction (2) in contrast to reaction
¹
(4) has
V
³ 0 and its efficiency should depend on the free
volume, which differs for different matrices]. Furthermore, the
value of giso » 2.003 for the product of the reaction is near to
the value of giso for alkyl radicals and is in marked contrast
with the values characteristic of complexes of sulfur-containing
RCs with neutral molecules, for example, giso » 2.013 for
complexes with arenes.13
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for
Basic Research (project no. 07-03-00105) and the Presidium of
the Russian Academy of Sciences (ChD-01).
References
1
Radical Ionic Systems, eds. A. Lund and M. Shiotani, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.
(a)
2
M. Ya. Melnikov and V. A. Smirnov, Handbook of Photochemistry of
Organic Radicals: Absorption, Emission, Properties, Mechanisms,
Aging, Begell House Inc., New York, 1996.
(b)
3
4
5
V. I. Feldman and M. Ya. Mel’nikov, Khim. Vys. Energ., 2000, 34, 279
[High Energy Chem. (Engl. Transl.), 2000, 34, 236].
V. A. Bagryanskii, V. I. Borovkov and Yu. N. Molin, Usp. Khim., 2007,
76, 535 (Russ. Chem. Rev., 2007, 76, 493).
K. Toriyama, K. Nunome and M. Iwasaki, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1985,
122, 118.
(c)
6
7
8
T. Shida and T. Kato, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1979, 68, 106.
D. R. Duling, J. Magn. Reson., 1994, 104B, 105.
Einfuhrung in die Photochemie, ed. G. O. Bekker, Detscher Verlag der
Wissenshaften, Berlin, 1976.
9
D. N. Laikov and Yu. A. Ustynyuk, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 2005,
804 (Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., 2005, 54, 820).
(d)
10 D. N. R. Rao, M. C. R. Symons and B. W. Wren, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2, 1984, 1681.
11 X.-Z. Qin, Q.-C. Meng and F. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109,
6778.
12 T. Shida, Electronic Absorption Spectra of Radical Ions, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 1988.
2.5 mT
Figure 1 EPR spectra of trimethylene sulfide in Freon 11 (a) X-ray
irradiated frozen 0.1 mol% solutions at 77 K, (b) solution (a) after annealing
to 150 K, (c) solution of trimethylene sulfide RC after photobleaching with
l = 436 nm at 77 K, (d) spectrum (a) simulated with the following parameters:
a(4H ) = 3.2 mT, a(1H ) = 1.2 mT, g|| > g^ and g = 0.022.
13 D. W. Werst, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 3640.
Received: 7th September 2007; Com. 07/3010
– 68 –