Synthesis of Syn-Photodimers of Dicyclopentadienes
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 66, No. 1, 2001 167
1
4
.38 (m, 4H), 1.31 (d, 2H, J ) 10.0 Hz); 13CNMR δ 84.5, 57.9,
5.0, 44.1, 42.7, 42.1, 40.8, 38.1, 37.4, 32.7, 22.7.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for [2 + 2] In tr a m olecu la r P h oto-
room temperature and stirred for another 30 min. Excess
LiAlH
4
was cautiously destroyed by dropwise addition of ethyl
SO satd. solution. The
acetate and 1-2 drops of aqueous Na
reaction mixture was then extracted with ethyl acetate and
washed with water and brine, and the organic layer was dried
2
4
cycloa d d ition s. The photocycloaddition conditions were op-
timized for each diester by first performing the reaction in a
quartz NMR tube with THF-d
1
8
and monitoring by H NMR
2 4
over Na SO . The solvent was removed in vacuo to yield a solid
spectroscopy. Each reaction was then repeated on a larger
scale as follows. Diester 3 (0.1 mmol) was dissolved in dry THF
residue which was purified by column chromatography (hex-
ane/ethyl acetate, 60/40 v/v) to obtain pure 10 (from 7d ,e) or
11 (from 8c,f) (7 mg, 84% yield) as a crystalline solid. 10: mp
(20 mL) and placed in a dry quartz tube shielded with a Vycor
1
filter. A catalytic amount (about 5 mol %) of (CuOTf) ‚C
2
6
H
6
202-204 °C; H NMR δ 4.22 (m, 2H), 3.09 (m, 2H), 2.79 (m,
was added and the solution was irradiated with a 450 W
Hanovia medium-pressure Hg lamp placed in a quartz well.
The well was positioned at 2-3 cm distance from the quartz
tube containing the solution. The reaction was monitored by
2H), 2.66 (d, 2H, J ) 11 Hz), 2.36 (m, 6H), 2.23 (m, 2H), 1.92
(m, 2H), 1.55-1.66 (m, 6H), 1.41 (m, 2H), 1.36 (d, 2H, J ) 11
Hz); 13C NMR δ 75.1, 49.9, 45.2, 42.5, 42.3, 41.9, 41.1, 40.1,
36.4, 22.6. HRMS (FAB) calcd for C20
28 2
H O 300.2089, found
1
TLC and H NMR spectroscopy (disappearance of olefinic
(M+) 300.2029 (0.3 m); (MH+) 301.2161 (-0.7 m); (M-1)
1
protons). After the reaction was complete, THF was removed
in vacuo and the crude residue purified by silica gel column
chromatography (silica gel, hexane/ethyl acetate, 100-95/0-5
299.2009. 11: mp 190-192 °C; H NMR δ 4.22 (m, 2H), 3.09
(m, 2H), 2.79 (m, 2H), 2.66 (d, 2H, J ) 10.5 Hz), 2.36 (m, 6H),
2.23 (m, 2H), 1.92 (m, 2H), 1.55-1.66 (m, 6H), 1.41 (m, 2H),
2
8
13
v/v depending on the product) to afford pure 7 and 8. 7b:
1.36 (d, 2H, J ) 11 Hz); C NMR δ 75.1, 49.9, 45.2, 42.5, 42.3,
1
mp 116-118 °C; HNMR δ 5.08 (m, 2H), 2.76 (m, 2H), 2.46
41.9, 41.1, 40.1, 36.4, 22.6; HRMS (FAB) calcd for C20
300.2089, found (M ) 300.2097.
H
28
O
2
+
(
m, 4H), 2.44 (m, 6H), 2.28 (m, 4H), 2.07-2.17 (m, 6H), 2.00
1
3
(m, 2H), 1.80 (m, 2H), 1.64 (m, 2H), 1.48 (m, 4H); C NMR δ
Exp er im en ta l Cr ysta l Da ta . Intensity data were mea-
sured on a Bruker diffractometer with CuKR radiation (λ )
1.54178 Å). Structures were solved by direct methods, aided
by program XS, and refined with full-matrix least-squares
1
2
3
2
6
73.4, 79.6, 50.2, 44.3, 42.3, 39.7, 38.4, 37.4, 34.7, 34.6, 21.8,
+
0.8; HRMS (FAB) calcd for C25
32 4
H O 396.4976, found (MH )
1
97.2391. 8b: mp 95-97 °C; HNMR δ 5.00 (m, 2H), 3.23 (m,
H), 2.87 (m, 2H), 2.58 (m, 4H), 2.37 (m, 4H), 2.13-2.34 (m,
H), 1.96-2.06 (m, 8H), 1.57 (m, 2H), 1.41 (m, 4H); 13C NMR
2
9
program XL, from SHELXTL. The XL program minimizes
2
F
differences, and uses all data; i.e., weak data are not
δ 172.6, 78.0, 50.4, 48.3, 44.6, 42.3, 41.5, 39.9, 37.8, 36.0, 35.7,
2
considered “unobserved” during refinement. For 5: C H32O2,
2
2
3.3, 22.5; HRMS (FAB) calcd for C25 396.4976, found
H
32
O
4
FW ) 328.48, triclinic space group P(-1); a ) 6.9036(3) Å, b
) 7.6249(4) Å, c ) 8.9770(7) Å, R ) 87.060(7)°, â ) 70.192(5)°,
+
1
(
2
2
MH ) 397.2393. 7c: mp 120-121 °C; H NMR δ 4.87 (m, 2H),
3
.84 (m, 2H), 2.41 (m, 2H), 2.35 (m, 2H), 2.26 (m, 2H), 2.17 (d,
γ ) 78.226(5)°, V ) 435.15(5) Å , Z ) 1, and D(X-ray) ) 1.253
-
3
H, J ) 9.5 Hz), 2.14 (m, 2H), 2.03-2.09 (m, 6H), 1.75-1.82
mg mm . 1589 data measured to a 2θ max of 115° at T ) 294
K. R ) 0.0359 for 1157 reflections with [I > 2σ(I)], R ) 0.0367,
wR2 ) 0.1017 for all 1192 unique reflections. For 6: C H O ,
1
3
(
m, 6H), 1.58-1.69 (m, 4H), 1.43-1.51 (m, 4H); C NMR δ
1
3
4
74.2, 79.6, 46.8, 43.6, 43.3, 42.9, 39.4, 38.4, 37.0, 36.0, 33.2,
7.5, 28.0, 22.6, 21.7, 14.1; HRMS (FAB) calcd for C26
2
2
32
2
H
34
O
H
4
FW ) 328.48, triclinic space group P(-1); a ) 7.7130(4) Å, b
) 8.9995(7) Å, c ) 13.5820(9) Å, R ) 106.814(6)°, â ) 92.935-
+
1
10.5242, found (MH ) 411.2549. 8c: mp 110-112 °C;
3
NMR δ 4.85 (m, 2H), 2.99 (m, 2H), 2.79 (m, 2H), 2.66 (m, 2H),
(7)°, γ ) 96.154(6)°, V ) 893.9(1) Å , Z ) 2, and D(X-ray) )
-
3
2
2
(
.56 (d, 2H, J ) 11.0 Hz), 2.32-2.39 (series of m, 6H), 2.20 (d,
H, J ) 5.0 Hz), 2.10 (d, 2H, J ) 4.0 Hz), 1.99 (m, 2H), 1.93
1.220 mg mm . 2718 data measured to a 2θ max of 115.5° at
T ) 294 K. R ) 0.0572 for 2320 reflections with [I > 2σ(I)], R
) 0.0586, wR2 ) 0.1521 for all 2444 unique reflections. For
7e: C H O , FW ) 516.69, monoclinic space group C2/c; a )
m, 2H), 1.65-1.73 (m, 4H), 1.55 (m, 2H), 1.41 (m, 4H); 13
C
NMR δ 172.8, 49.8, 47.3, 42.7, 42.4, 41.6, 41.1, 39.0, 35.5, 35.2,
5.7, 22.4; HRMS (FAB) calcd for C26 410.5242, found
MH ) 411.2538. 7d : H NMR δ 4.93 (m, 2H), 2.67 (m, 2H),
.50 (m, 2H), 2.35 (m, 2H), 2.17 (m, 4H), 2.09 (m, 2H), 2.01
3
4
44
4
2
(
H
34
O
4
35.4020(13) Å, b ) 7.7641(4) Å, c ) 19.7431(5) Å, â ) 100.14-
3
+
28
1
-3
(1)°, V ) 5342.0(4) Å , Z ) 8, and D(X-ray) ) 1.285 mg mm .
2
4287 data measured to a 2θ max of 116° at T ) 294 K. R )
0.0541 for 2443 reflections with [I > 2σ(I)], R ) 0.088, wR2 )
0.1359 for all 3482 unique reflections. This crystal was twinned
by a rotation about the real c axis. The crystal shape is a thin
lath or sword, with the major face indexed as the 100.
Twinning is caused by stacking of thin lathes that occasionally
differed by 180 degrees in the direction of their +b long axes,
a reasonable stacking fault. The hk0 layers of the two twin
diffraction patterns are exactly superimposed. This was par-
tially corrected by assigning, and refining, a separate scale
factor for the hk0 data. The l ) 3 layer had to be excluded
from the refinement, because the two patterns almost coincide,
and reflections overlap, on that level. Thirteen reflections from
other layers were excluded for likely twin interference; all had
large discrepancies of the F . F type. Several crystals were
(
m, 2H), 1.85-1.93 (m, 6H), 1.60-1.67 (m, 8H), 1.37-1.42 (m,
1
3
8
3
C
H); C NMR δ 173.3, 77.6, 45.3, 43.9, 43.0, 42.1, 40.4, 38.3,
7.2, 36.1, 32.2, 29.6, 26.0, 22.0; HRMS (FAB) calcd for
+
28
29
38 4
H O 438.5773, found (MH ) 439.2834. 7e: mp slow
1
decomposition above 300 °C; H NMR δ 4.72 (m, 2H), 2.76 (m,
2
H), 2.43 (d, 2H, J ) 12.5 Hz), 2.38 (m, 2H), 1.89-2.16 (series
13
of m, 20H), 1.58-1.66 (m, 6H), 1.40-1.49 (m, 10H); C NMR
δ 171.3, 78.7, 47.8, 46.0, 44.5, 44.0, 43.8, 43.7, 40.0, 39.6, 38.7,
3
7.3, 36.3, 34.3, 33.8, 28.6, 21.9; HRMS (FAB) calcd for
34 44 4
C H O 516.3240, found (M+) 517.3214 (-2.6 m), found
(
MH+) 517.3304. 7f: mp: slow decomposition above 300 °C;
1
H NMR δ 5.12 (m, 2H), 2.77 (m, 2H), 2.43 (m, 2H), 2.35 (d,
2
2
8
1
3
H, J ) 5.0 Hz), 2.22 (d, 2H, J ) 10.0 Hz), 2.13-2.18 (m, 4H),
.10 (m, 2H), 1.98-2.06 (m, 8H), 1.88 (m, 4H), 1.65-1.71 (m,
H), 1.50-1.56 (m, 2H), 1.36 (d, 2H, J ) 10.0 Hz); 13C NMR δ
72.3, 79.7, 49.9, 44.5, 43.6, 43.1, 42.1, 40.8, 39.0, 38.9, 37.7,
7.4, 36.6, 35.5, 33.9, 28.3, 21.3; HRMS (FAB) calcd for
o
c
examined and all were twinned but the volume-ratio of the
two components varied. In the best case, reported herein, the
V ratio was about 3:1. For 8f: C H O , FW ) 488.64,
3
2
40
4
C
32
H
40
O
4
488.2927, found (MH+) 489.3005. 8f: mp slow
monoclinic space group P2 /c; a ) 6.4064(4) Å, b ) 18.637(1)
1
1
3
decomposition above 300 °C; H NMR δ 5.03 (m, 2H), 3.18 (m,
Å, c ) 20.683(1) Å, â ) 95.31(1)°, V ) 2458.9(3) Å , Z ) 4, and
-
3
2
1
1
4
H), 2.89 (m, 2H), 2.58 (m, 6H), 2.40 (m, 2H), 1.97-2.22 (m,
0H), 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.71-1.78 (m, 6H), 1.61 (m, 2H), 1.37-
D(X-ray) ) 1.320 mg mm . 7662 data measured to a 2θ max
of 116° at T ) 294 K. R ) 0.0499 for 2754 reflections with [I
> 2σ(I)], R ) 0.0627, wR2 ) 0.1290 for all 3424 unique
reflections.
1
3
.44 (m, 6H); C NMR δ 176.2, 78.0, 50.8, 48.5, 45.1, 42.1,
2.0, 39.9, 38.8, 37.2, 36.8, 35.8, 29.6, 28.4, 28.3, 22.5; HRMS
(
FAB) calcd for C32
Mixture of 7f and 8f. Anal. Calcd for C32
.25. Found: C, 79.43; H, 9.59.
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for Clea va ge of th e Teth er . LiAlH
0.06 mmol) was suspended in THF (1 mL) and cooled with
H
40
O
4
488.2927, found (MH+) 489.3012.
More details, structural results and figures for 5, 6, 7e, and
8f are reported in the Supporting Information and have
been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data
40 4
H O
: C, 78.65; H,
8
4
(
(28) Compounds 8d and 8e have not been synthesized, because the
an ice bath. To this stirred suspension was added dropwise a
solution of 7d ,e or 8c,f (0.03 mmol) in THF (2 mL). After the
addition was complete, the contents were allowed to warm to
photocycloadditions of 3d and 3e were performed on the isolated (R,
R/S, S) diastereomer, which produces only the exo-trans-exo isomer 7.
(29) Sheldrick, G. SHELXTL96, Acta Crystallogr. A 1990, 46, 467.