7828 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 104, No. 32, 2000
Chou et al.
energy between the 7AZD dimer (or 7AZD/guest complex) and
its corresponding 7AZD(T) dimer (or 7AZD(T)/guest complex)
in the ground state. Alternatively, using a 6-31G(d,p) basis set,
the change of free energy for 7AZD(T)/ACID, 7AZD(T) dimer
and 7AZD(T)/LACTIM was calculated to be 10.7, 22.5, and
23.4 kcal/mol, respectively, relative to their corresponding 7AZD
(amino form) hydrogen bonding complexes (see Table 2). The
assignment of the 0-0 band for the S0-S1 transition of the
7AZD dimer and/or complexes is relatively difficult due to their
broad absorption profile. For a simplified approach, we take
the frequency where the intensity of the excitation spectrum
(monitored at the tautomer emission of 7AZD/ACID) is ∼1/3
of the maximum to be the 0-0 transition (∼340 nm; 29 412
cm-1) for either the normal 7AZD dimer or the 7AZD/guest
complexes. Conversely, it is rather simple to assign the S0′-
S1′ (0-0) transition of the imine tautomer due to its vibronically
progressive emission observed in the 7AZD/ACID complex. We
then take the first vibronic peak of 412 nm (24 272 cm-1, see
Figure 5) to be the 0-0 transition which is also applied to either
the 7AZD(T) dimer or the 7AZD(T)/LACTIM complex. Given
all of these values, the relative energy levels of a proton-transfer
cycle in the singlet manifold are depicted in Scheme 1.
Apparently, 7AZD/ACID proton-transfer tautomerism in the
excited state is calculated to be -4.1 kcal/mol. On the contrary,
an endergonic value of 7.7 and 8.6 kcal/mol was obtained for
the case of the 7AZD dimer and 7AZD/LACTAM complex,
respectively. Although this approach is qualitative due to the
uncertainty of obtaining accurate excited-state energy levels for
both normal and tautomer species in solution phase, it clearly
shows that for 7AZD dimer and 7AZD/LACTAM complex
ESDPT is thermally unfavorable, consistent with the experi-
mental results. The result can also be rationalized qualitatively
by the noncatalytic type of ESDPT where the guest molecules,
i.e., 7AZD amino form (in the 7AZD dimer) and LACTAM
(in the 7AZD/LACTAM complex) should undergo a corre-
sponding change to the imine and lactim forms, respectively,
during ESDPT. Such a noncatalytic process should raise its S1′
energy level which is a consequence of the simultaneous
tautomerization for both host and guest molecules. The result
of endergonic tautomerism on one hand may simply indicate
that either the 7AZD dimer or the 7AZD/LACTAM complex
may populate predominantly in the excited state through a fast
thermal equilibrium, resulting in a normal Stokes shifted
emission. On the other hand, the more endergonic reaction may
empirically lead to a higher formation free energy of the
activated complex, i.e., the existence of a high energy barrier,
so that ESDPT may be frustrated during the lifetime of the
excited 7AZD dimer or the 7AZD/LACTAM complex. Both
mechanisms unfortunately cannot be distinguished at this stage.
The results open up a study of ESDPT dynamics based on
an generalized amine/imine tautomerism in which the mecha-
nism may be extended to a DNA base such as adenine
possessing similar type of tautomerization proposed in the
mutation process.40 In contrast, despite the dual hydrogen-
bonding association, ESDPT is prohibited in the case of the
7AZD dimer and 7AZD/LACTAM complex, supporting the
proposed noncatalytic type of ESDPT mediated by the length
of the π electron conjugation.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Science Council, Taiwan, R.O.C. (grant No. NSC 87 -2119-
M-194-002).
References and Notes
(1) Taylor, C. A.; El-Bayoumi, A. M.; Kasha, M. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 1969, 65, 253.
(2) Ingham, K. C.; El-Bayoumi, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93,
5023
(3) Ingham. K. C.; El-Bayoumi, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96,
1674.
(4) Watson, J. D.; Crick, F. H. C. Nature (London) 1953, 171, 964.
(5) Watson, D. G.; Sweet, R. M.; Marsh, R. E. Acta Crystallogr. 1965,
19, 573.
(6) Douhal, A.; Kim, S. K.; Zewail, A. H. Nature, 1995, 378.
(7) (a) Chachisvillis, M.; Fiebig, T.; Douhal, A.; Zewail, A. H. J. Phys.
Chem. A 1998, 102, 669. (b) Fiebig, T.; Chachisvillis, M.; Manger, M.;
Zewail, A. H.; Douhal, A.; Garcia-Ochoa, I.; de La Hoz Ayuso, A. J. Phys.
Chem. A 1999, 103, 7419.
(8) Chou, P. T.; Wei, C. Y.; Wu, G. R.; Chen, W. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 12186.
(9) Chou, P. T.; Wu, G. R.; Wei, C. Y.; Cheng, C. C.; Chang, C. P.;
Hung, F. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 10042.
(10) McMorrow, D.; Aartsma, T. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 125, 581.
(11) (a) Tokumura, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Itoh, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1986,
90, 2362. (b) Tokumura, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Udagawa, M.; Itoh, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1346.
(12) Moog, R. S.; Bovino, S. C.; Simon, J. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92,
6545.
(13) Koijnenberg, J.; Huizer, A. H.; Varma, C. A. O. J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 2 1988, 84 (8), 1163.
(14) (a) Moog., R. S.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 10359.
(b) Chapman, C. F.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 8430. (c)
Mentus, S.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3860.
(15) (a) Negreie, M.; Bellefeuille, S. M.; Whitham, S.; Petrich, J. W.;
Thornburg, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7419. (b) Negrerie, M.;
Gai, F.; Bellefeuille, S. M.; Petrich, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 8663.
(c) Negrerie, M.; Gai, F.; Lambry, J.-C.; Martin, J.-L.; Petrich, J. W. J.
Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 5046. (d) Chen, Y.; Rich, R. L.; Gai, F.; Petrich, J.
W. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 1770. (e) Chen, Y.; Gai, F.; Petrich, J. W. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10158. (f) Rich, R. L.; Chen, Y.; Neven, D.;
Negrerie, M.; Gai, F.; Petrich, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 1781. (g)
Gai, F.; Rich, R. L.; Petrich, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 735. (h)
Smirnov, A. V.; English, D. S.; Rich, R. L.; Lane, J. Teyton, L.;
Schwabacher, A. W.; Luo, S.; Thornburg, R. W.; Petrich, J. W. J. Phys.
Chem. 1997, 101, 1B, 2758.
(16) (a) Chou, P. T.; Martinez, M. L.; Cooper, W. C.; McMorrow, D.;
Collin, S. T.; Kasha; M. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 5203. (b) Chang, C. P.;
Hwang W. C.; Kuo M. S.; Chou P. T.; Clement, J. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1994,
98, 8801. (c) Chou, P. T.; Wei, C. Y.; Chang, C. P.; Chiu, C. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7259. (d) Chou, P. T.; Wei, C. Y.; Chang, C. P.;
Kuo, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 11994. (e) Chou, P. T.; Yu, W. S.;
Chen, Y. C.; Wei, C. Y.; Martinez, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
12927.
(17) Chaban, G. M.; Gordan, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 185.
(18) 7AZD has been used as an intermediate to synthesize various
7-azaindoles.19 However, its photophysical and photochemical properties
have not yet been reported.
(19) Taylor, E. C.; Macor, J. E.; Pont, J. L. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 5145.
(20) Gonnela, N. C.; Roberts, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 3162.
(21) Dryefus, M.; Dodin, G.; Bensaude, O.; Dubois, J. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1975, 97, 2369.
(22) Robison, M. M.; Robison, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 6554.
(23) Demas, J. N.; Crosby, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 991-1024.
(24) Chou, P. T.; Wei, C. Y.; Hung, F. T. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997, 101,
9119.
(25) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.;
Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A.
5. Conclusion
Summarizing the above results and discussion, we have
studied hydrogen-bonded complexes of 7AZD by means of
absorption, emission, and theoretical calculations.
For the catalytic type of ESDPT such as 7AZD/ACID, where
cyclic dual hydrogen bonds are intrinsically formed, the
photoinduced double proton transfer may require only a small
displacement of the hydrogen atom and/or molecular skeleton,
resulting in a small energy barrier. The rate of such a cooperative
proton-transfer reaction, taking place either stepwise or simul-
taneously, is expected to be much faster than the spontaneous
decay rate of the excited 7AZD/ACID complex, as supported
by the lack of a normal 7AZD/ACID emission as well as the
unresolved imine tautomer fluorescence rise time (τrise < 3 ×
10-10 s).