4566
J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4566-4567
Ta ble 1. Ca ta lyzed P in a col Cou p lin g of Ald eh yd es a n d
Keton esa
Liga n d -Mod ified Ca ta lysts for th e McMu r r y
P in a col Rea ction
entry
substrate
C6H5CHO
% yieldb
dl:mesoc,d
Timothy A. Lipski, Mark A. Hilfiker, and
Scott G. Nelson*
a
b
c
d
e
f
90
95
85
79
76
81
84
69:31
55:45
83:17
74:26
67:33
67:33
62:38
p-BrC6H4CHO
C6H11CHO
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
PhCH2CH2CHO
Me2CHCH2CHO
C6H5COCH3
Received May 7, 1997
g
2-C10-H7COCH3
a
The McMurry pinacol reaction is an exceptionally
versatile bond construction in organic synthesis and is,
in many instances, the singular method for the prepara-
tion of highly strained alkenes and macrocyclic or poly-
cyclic ring systems.1 Despite the level of sophistication
achieved in the McMurry reaction, intermolecular pinacol
reactions continue to suffer from the requirement of
stoichiometric quantities of expensive or difficult to
prepare reducing agents and the notorious lack of ste-
reoselection typically observed in these reactions.2,3 Cata-
lyzed reducing systems offer a potential solution to the
operational and economic difficulties associated with
these reactions, a fact that has undoubtedly contributed
to recent reports of pinacol reactions catalyzed by Ti(III),4
V(I),5 Sn(IV),3b and Sm(II) complexes.6 Intermolecular
pinacol couplings promoted by Ti(III)4b,7 and V(II) re-
agents8 are among the rare examples of highly diaste-
reoselective reductive carbonyl-coupling reactions. In the
context of developing catalyzed reductive C-C bond
constructions, we were interested in simultaneously
addressing the issues of cost, operational simplicity, and
stereochemical control by developing catalyzed pinacol
reactions with the intent of modulating reaction stereo-
selection via the catalyst complex and its attendant
ligands. We report herein the use of organic-soluble Ti-
(III) complexes as highly efficient catalysts for pinacol
homocoupling reactions and the development of ligand-
modified catalysts for controlling diastereoselectivity in
the reductive coupling of aryl aldehydes (eq 1).
Reactions were carried out using the conditions given in ref
b
14. Values reported are those for chromatographically purified
materials after silyl ether hydrolysis. c Ratios determined by 1H
d
NMR analysis of crude reaction mixture. Stereochemical assign-
ments made by comparison of spectroscopic data to that reported
in the literature.
While investigating the pinacol coupling of enolization-
prone aldehydes, we discovered that the organic-soluble
trichlorortris(tetrahydrofuran)titanium(III) complex9 was
the optimal reducing agent for effecting these bond
constructions. In the course of this investigation, sub-
stoichiometric quantities of TiCl3(THF)3 were found to
dramatically accelerate pinacol coupling reactions em-
ploying the Zn/TMSCl reducing system originally re-
ported by Boudjouk.10 Catalyst loadings of TiCl3(THF)3
as low as 1 mol % effect the pinacol homocoupling of
benzaldehyde at -78 °C, in the presence of Zn (0.6-1.2
equiv) and TMSCl (1.2 equiv), to afford hydrobenzoin in
quantitative yield (1.2:1 dl:meso).11,12 Analogous reaction
conditions provided no pinacol product in the absence of
the titanium catalyst. While the TiCl3(THF)3-catalyzed
reducing system proved effective for coupling benzalde-
hyde, reaction diastereoselection was unacceptably low,
and coupling reactions of less electrophilic aromatic or
aliphatic aldehydes proceeded only slowly or not at all
under these reaction conditions. These limitations
prompted us to pursue the development of modified
catalyst complexes that would provide greater substrate
generality and improved levels of diastereoselection.
Efforts to extend the TiCl3(THF)3-catalyzed pinacol
couplings to less reactive substrates were advanced
considerably by the observation that certain reaction
additives dramatically enhance pinacol reaction rates.
Substoichiometric quantities (5-30 mol %) of protic (t-
BuOH, catechol, 2,2′-biphenol) or Lewis basic (DMPU,
DMF, N,N-dimethylacetamide) additives afford ∼5-10-
fold rate accelerations relative to the parent TiCl3(THF)3
catalyst.13 The catalyst system derived from TiCl3-
(THF)3-t-BuOH emerged from this investigation as the
optimal pinacol catalyst on the basis of turnover rates
and operational simplicity. Thus, in the presence of Zn
(1.2 equiv) and TMSCl (1.2 equiv), TiCl3(THF)3-t-BuOH
(5 mol %) catalyzes the reductive homocoupling of a
variety of carbonyl compounds (Table 1), with diastereo-
selection ranging from dl:meso ) 1.5-3:1 for aryl alde-
hydes (entries a and b), aliphatic aldehydes (entries d
(1) (a) McMurry, J . E. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1513-1524 and
references cited therein.
(2) Robertson, G. M. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis: Carbon-
Carbon σ-Bond Formation; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Heathcock, C.
H., Eds.; Pergamon Press: New York, 1991; Vol. 3, Chapter 2.6, pp
563-611.
(3) A number of highly diastereoselective intramolecular pinacol
couplings have been reported; see: (a) Reference 1. (b) Raw, A. S.;
Pedersen, S. F. J . Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 830-833. (c) Guidot, J . P.; Le
Gall, T.; Mioskowski, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 6671-6672. (d)
Hays, D. S.; Fu, G. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7283-7284. (e)
Kang, M.; Park, J .; Konradi, A. W.; Pedersen, S. F. J . Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 5528-5531.
(4) (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Hupperts, A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
4468-4475. (b) Gansa¨uer, A. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1997,
457-458.
(9) Manzer, L. E. Inorg. Synth. 1982, 21, 135-140.
(10) So, J .-H.; Park, M.-K.; Boudjouk, P. J . Org. Chem. 1988, 53,
5871-5875.
(11) The structure of the Ti(III) catalyst proved to be a determining
factor in the success of the catalyzed pinacol reactions. Titanium(III)
chloride that had not been precomplexed with THF was inactive as a
catalyst under the indicated reaction conditions.
(12) For a discussion of possible mechanisms of low-valent metal-
catalyzed pinacol reactions in the presence of TMSCl, see refs 4, 5,
and 6b.
(13) The magnitude of the rate acceleration is substrate dependent;
less reactive substrates (e.g., aliphatic aldehydes) exhibit the largest
rate accelerations relative to the parent catalyst system.
(5) Hirao, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Muguruma, Y.; Ikeda, I. J . Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 366-367.
(6) (a) Le´onard, E.; Dun˜ach, E.; Pe´richon, J . J . Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1989, 276-277. (b) Nomura, R.; Matsuno, T.; Endo, T. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11666-11667.
(7) (a) Raubenheimer, H. G.; Seebach, D. Chimia 1986, 40, 12-13.
(b) Handa, Y; Inanaga, J . Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 5717-5718. (c)
Barden, M. C.; Schwartz, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5484-5485.
(8) Konradi, A. W.; Kemp, S. J .; Pedersen, S. F. J . Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 1316-1323 and references cited therein.
S0022-3263(97)00792-5 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society