alkynes.6 This limitation greatly restricts the application of
epoxy alkyne, which is an important substance and also an
interesting topic in organic synthesis.7 In continuation of our
interest in the development of new methodologies for
R-hydroxy epoxide ring-opening,8 we found the first member
of this family that deviates from this requirement, wherein
the π-system of one molecule (alkyne) combines with a
functional group and has no multiple bonds (epoxide),
affording synthetically useful allenes (Scheme 2).9,10 To the
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
entry catalyst (mol %) solvent temp, °C time, min yield,b
%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
TsOH (5)
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH2Cl2
toluene
THF
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
-78
20
20
10
10
15
15
15
10
10
10
30
60
79
76
77
87
77
81
83
73
71
67
67
66
CF3CO2H (5)
CH3SO3H (5)
TsOH (10)
TsOH (10)
TsOH (10)
TsOH (10)
AlCl3 (5)
FeCl3 (5)
AuCl3 (5)
BF3·OEt2 (5)
TiCl4 (5)
Scheme 2
9
10
11
12
a Reactions were conducted with 0.3 mmol of 1a, in 2 mL of solvent.
b Isolated yield.
best of our knowledge, there are only a few successful
examples of this system.11 Herein, we report a novel catalytic
method for synthesis of allenes via acid-catalyzed skeletal
rearrangement of epoxy alkynes. The π-system of the alkyne
attacking at the epoxide ring acted as the key step.
Initially, we started our investigation by using epoxy
alkyne 1a (0.3 mmol), treated with TsOH (5 mol %) in
CH3CN (2 mL) at room temperature. To our delight, the
expected allene 2a (Figure 1)12 was obtained in 79% yield
(entries 2 and 3). When the amount of TsOH was increased
to 10 mol %, a satisfying yield of 87% was obtained in 10
min (entry 4). However, when a change was made to other
solvents for this reaction, no superior results were obtained
(entries 5-7). Lewis acids, such as AlCl3, AuCl3, FeCl3,
BF3·OEt2, and TiCl4, were also investigated, and we were
pleased to find that similar results were obtained with lower
catalyst loading (entries 8-12). Thus the use of TsOH (10
mol %) in CH3CN (conditions A) and AlCl3 (5 mol %) in
CH2Cl2 (conditions B) at room temperature were both used
as the standard conditions.
With the optimal conditions in hand, we investigated more
examples. The results are summarized in Table 2. In
conditions A, the analogous substrates 1b and 1c were
prepared and also successfully converted to the corresponding
products 2b and 2c in 51% and 89% yields, respectively
(entries 2 and 3). Successively, the more complex cyclic
substrates 1e-g demonstrated the efficiency of this rear-
rangement and gave the synthetically valuable allenes 2e-g
in 66-92% yields (entries 5-7). Experiments with acyclic
substrates 1h-n14 were also examined, and the correspond-
ing products 2h-n were obtained in 41-65% yields (entries
Figure 1. The X-ray structure of 2a.
in 20 min (Table 1, entry 1). Then the catalysis conditions
were optimized by changing the catalysts and solvents, as
shown in Table 1.13 Protic acids, including CF3CO2H and
CH3SO3H, also catalyzed this reaction, and the desired
product 2a was obtained in 76% and 77% yields, respectively
(9) (a) Trost, B. M.; Pinkerton, A. B.; Seidel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 12466. (b) Baner, K. Liebigs Ann. l997, 2005.
(10) (a) Allenes in Organic Synthesis; Schuster, H. F., Coppola, G. M.,
Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1984. (b) The Chemistry of Ketenes,
Allenes, and Related Compounds, Part 1; Patai, S., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons:
New York, 1980. (c) Modern Allene Chemistry; Krause, N., Hashmi,
A. S. K., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004.
(5) (a) Burova, S. A.; McDonald, F. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
2495. (b) Kim, K.; Okamoto, S.; Sato, F. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 67.
(6) (a) Lin, M.-Y.; Maddirala, S. J.; Liu, R.-S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1745.
(b) Lin, G.-Y.; Li, C.-W.; Hung, S.-H.; Liu, R.-S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 5059.
(c) Dai, L.-Z.; Qi, M.-J.; Shi, Y.-L.; Liu, X.-G.; Shi, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
3191.
(11) Madhushaw, R. J.; Li, C.-L.; Shen, K.-H.; Hu, C.-C.; Liu, R.-S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7427.
(12) The molecular structure of the corresponding product 2a was
determined by X-ray crystallography (Figure 1). Crystallographic data have
been described in the Supporting Information.
(7) Arcadi, A. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 3266.
(13) For detailed optimization of reaction conditions, see the Supporting
Information.
(14) Syn/anti mixtures of the substrates were used and the ratio was
determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis. For a full explanation and
definition of the terms syn and anti as used herein see: Marson, C. M.;
Benzies, D. W. M.; Hobson, A. D. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 5491.
(8) (a) Shu, X.-Z.; Liu, X.-Y.; Ji, K.-G.; Xiao, H.-Q.; Liang, Y.-M.
Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 5282. (b) Ji, K.-G.; Shen, Y.-W.; Shu, X.-Z.;
Xiao, H.-Q.; Bian, Y.-J.; Liang, Y.-M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1275.
(c) Ji, K.-G.; Shu, X.-Z.; Chen, J.; Zhao, S.-C.; Zheng, Z.-J.; Liu, X.-Y.;
Liang, Y.-M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 2501.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 15, 2009
3215