H.A. Abdel-Aziz et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 70 (2013) 358e363
359
activities by inhibiting tyrosine kinase or caspase-3/7. In 2006, the
FDA approved an indoline-2,3-dione derivative, Sunitinib
(Sutent)Ò, for the oral management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
and imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) [16].
Additionally, we have documented the synthesis of certain novel
indoline-2,3-diones that display potent and selective anti-
proliferative activity against multidrug-resistant cancer cells
[17,18].
An examination of the literature revealed that Soliman et al.
obtained salicyaldehyde azine (3a) instead of the expected hydra-
zide 2a for the reaction of ester 1a with hydrazine hydrate (Fig. 1)
[19]. Recently, malonohydrazide (4) along with salicyaldehyde
azine (3a) were isolated from the reaction of 1a with hydrazine
hydrate and a mechanism for their formation was proposed [20]. In
the same vein, Sammour et al. reported that the reaction of ethyl 6-
bromo-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-carboxylate (1b) with hydrazine
hydrate gave compounds 3b and 4 instead of hydrazide 2b (Fig. 1)
[21]. Additionally, Mohamed et al. [22] published the reaction of
ethyl 7-hydroxy-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-carboxylate (1c) with hy-
drazine hydrate to give compounds 3c and 4 instead of hydrazide
2c (Fig. 1).
Interestingly, Ma et al. documented that the reaction of ethyl 7-
(diethylamino)-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-carboxylate (1d) with hy-
drazine hydrate gave hydrazide 2d (Fig. 1) [23], which was rigor-
ously confirmed [24]. These variable findings in the reaction of
ethyl chromene-3-carboxylates 1aed with hydrazine hydrate
demonstrate that the type and position of the substituent affect
significantly on the pyran-2-one ring stability.
In view of the aforementioned premises, and in a continuation
of our interest in the synthesis of hydrazone-based compounds
with anticancer activity [17,18,25e29], we aimed to report herein
the synthesis and in vitro antiproliferative activity of the title
compounds 10aei toward a panel of cancer cell lines as well as their
inhibitory activity on side population cancer stem cells.
These findings encouraged us to establish an alternative route
for synthesis of the targeted chromene-based hydrazones 10aei
starting from ethyl 3-hydrazinyl-3-oxopropanoate (6) (Scheme 1)
instead of esters 1a,b. Consequently, treatment of 6 with the
appropriate indoline-2,3-dione derivative 7aeg in refluxing
ethanol resulted in the formation of ethyl 3-oxo-3-(2-(2-
oxoindolin-3-ylidene)hydrazinyl) propanoates 8aeg (Scheme 1).
Condensation of hydrazones 8aeg with the appropriate sali-
cyaldehyde 9a or 9b in the presence of piperidine yielded 2-oxo-N’-
(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)-2H-chromene-3-carbohydrazides 10aei.
IR spectra of compounds 10aei revealed three carbonyl absorption
bands around 1700 cmꢁ1 as well as two NH absorption bands in the
3450e3100 cmꢁ1 region. Additionally, their 1H NMR spectra
showed two D2O-exchangeable signals in the region
d 9.07e11.3
and 11.0e11.95 due to NH of isatin and hydrazone functionalities,
d
respectively.
2.2. In vitro antiproliferative activity
In vitro antiproliferative activity of compounds 10aei against
leukemia K562, breast MDA-MB-468 and colon HT-29 cell lines is
displayed in Table 1. Compound 10c (R/R1 ¼ H/Cl) exhibited the
highest antiproliferative activity toward leukemia K562 cell line with
IC50
¼
9.44
ꢀ
0.02
m
M
followed by compounds 10d
M) which
(IC50 ¼ 12.08 ꢀ 0.01
mM) and 10f (IC50 ¼ 12.99 ꢀ 0.1
m
contain bromine and methoxy substituents at five position of indo-
line-2,3-dione moiety, respectively. The antiproliferative activity of
the other synthesized congeners is in the following decreasing order:
10a (IC50 ¼ 25.5 ꢀ 08
mM) > 10b > 10i > 10g > 10e > 10h
M). On the other hand, compound 10h
(IC50 ¼ 36.99 ꢀ 0.09
m
(IC50 ¼ 15.48 ꢀ 0.02
mM) is the most active candidate among all the
synthesized compounds 10aei against breast MDA-MB-468 cell line
while compound 10f exhibited the weakest antiproliferative activity
with IC50 ¼ 43.97 ꢀ 0.17
mM.
The best in vitro antiproliferative profile of compounds 10aei is
showed against colon HT-29 cancer cell line where compound 10f is
2. Results and discussion
the most active congener with IC50 ¼ 7.98 ꢀ 0.05
mM. Compound 10f
has un-substituted chromene moiety and a substituent, methoxy
group, endowed with negative inductive and positive mesomeric
effects at the five position of indoline-2,3-dione nucleus. Com-
pounds 1e (R/R1 ¼ H/Me), 1g (R/R1 ¼ H/NO2) and 1d (R/R1 ¼ H/Br)
exhibited a comparable biological activity to that of compound 10f
2.1. Chemistry
Hydrazides are versatile tools for the construction of several
functionalized heterocycles with interesting biological activities
[30e36]. Therefore, the synthesis of hydrazide-containing com-
pounds has drawn considerable interest [37,38]. The common route
for the synthesis of chromene-based hydrazones is the reaction of
the appropriate hydrazide 2 with indoline-2,3-diones. Many re-
ports indicate that hydrazide 2a is produced from the reaction of
ester 1a with hydrazine hydrate (Fig. 1) and that 2a can be used as a
key starting material in the synthesis of several heterocyclic com-
pounds and hydrazones [39e48]. However, the ring opening of
chromene-2-ones under moderate conditions has been reported
where the aliphatic pyran-2-one ring in the chromene system is
highly reactive. It undergoes ring opening at the lactone acyl center
under nucleophilic attack as well as under nucleophilic conjugate
addition at the carbonecarbon double bond [49].
with IC50 ¼ 8.42 ꢀ 0.01, 9 ꢀ 0.01 and 10.05 ꢀ 0.03
mM, respectively.
The decreasing order of antiproliferative activity of the rest com-
pounds toward colon HT-29 cancer cell line is as follows: 1h
(IC50 ¼ 12.25 ꢀ 0.04
mM) > 1b > 1i > 1a > 1c (IC50 ¼ 27.1 ꢀ0.46
mM).
2.3. Side population cancer stem cells inhibitor activity
The inhibitory activity of the target compounds 10aei against
side population colon HT-29 cancer stem cells was performed at
10
m
M (Table 2 and Fig. 2). Compound 1e (R/R1 ¼ H/Me) is the most
active inhibitor displaying 87.8 ꢀ 7% inhibition as compared with
the reference compound, Verapamil, which showed 95 ꢀ 8%
R1
O
O
O
O
R2
H2NHN
R1
R2
O
O
R1
R2
R1
R2
N
OEt
NHNH2
N
NHNH2
O
1a-d
O
2a-d
OH
3a-d
HO
4
1-3: a, R1 = R2 = H; b, R1 = Br, R2 = H; c, R1 = H, R2 = OH; d, R1 = H, R2 = N(Et)2
Fig. 1. The structure of compounds 1e3 (aed) and 4.