024701-2
Zakharov et al.
J. Chem. Phys. 124, 024701 ͑2006͒
FIG. 1. Sample structure for the surface-potential measurements of the sur-
face voltage across the 6 Az 10 PVA+5CB film on Al electrodes.
͓lower lines both in Figs. 2͑a͒ and 2͑b͔͒ films, caused by the
charge separation, taking place during trans-cis and cis-trans
isomerizations are measured using the surface-potential sig-
nals and shown in Figs. 2͑a͒ ͑case 1͒ and 2͑b͒ ͑case 2͒,
respectively.
The values of the surface charge densities and the
voltages V across both 6Az10PVA+5CB and 6Az10PVA
films were measured by the surface-potential technique, and
these data are collected in Table I.
FIG. 2. The relationship between the surface potential V and the conforma-
tional state both the 6 Az 10 PVA+5CB ͓lines ͑1͒ and ͑3͔͒ and 6Az10PVA
͓lines ͑2͒ and ͑4͔͒ films on metal electrodes, during the trans-cis and cis-
trans conformational transitions in the 6Az10PVA monolayer caused by UV
illumination, at T=298 K. ͑a͒ 6Az10PVA is in trans form at sequence 1, 3,
and 5, and in cis form at sequence 2, 4, and 6, respectively. ͑b͒ The same as
͑a͒, but for another sequence of the cis-trans conformational changes.
6Az10PVA is in cis form at sequence 1, 3, and 5, and trans form at sequence
2, 4, and 6, respectively.
produced by irradiating the spread layer with ultraviolet ra-
diation. The two molecular configurations produce qualita-
tively different isotherms. In the case of the trans conforma-
tional state of 6Az10PVA monolayer, the surface pressure
shows a steep increase at a molecular area Aϳ0.4 nm2 ͑solid
line͒, and saturates at ͑trans͒ϳ43 mN/m, whereas the cis
conformational state occurred at Aϳ1.2 nm2 ͑dashed line͒,
and saturates at ͑cis͒ϳ33 mN/m, respectively. So, the sur-
face area per molecule is markedly higher for the cis con-
figuration, which reflects the more efficient packing possible
with the trans state. The existence of higher collapse pres-
sure for the trans isomer compared to the cis isomer suggests
that intermolecular interactions are stronger in trans mono-
layer. In order to elucidate the role of the charge separation
during the trans-cis or cis-trans conformational changes on
the surface azobenzene monolayer, sandwiched between
liquid-crystal film and Al substrate, we use the molecular
model which takes into account the interactions between the
surface polarization and surface electric field. The interaction
of the LC film with the solid surface leads to changing of the
molecular orientation in the film. Our two-dimensional ͑2D͒
LC monolayer system is composed of axially symmetric
molecules, the hydrophilic heads of which are uniformly dis-
tributed on the azobenzene surface and the hydrophobic tails
are directed away from the interface. It allows us to consider
the model of axially symmetric molecular rods, the hydro-
philic heads of which are uniformly distributed on the sur-
face and the hydrophobic tails are directed away from the
water surface and tilted at the average equilibrium angle
ˆ
The isomerization involves a decrease of the distance
between the pair carbon atoms in azobenzene from about 0.9
nm in the trans form to 0.55 nm in the cis form. The trans
planar isomer, which has a rod-shaped configuration, is
transformed to the bent-shaped cis conformations in which
the −NwN− group is in a plane perpendicular to the phe-
nylene groups. Likewise, trans-azobenzene has very small
dipole moment ͑0–0.5 D͒, while the dipole moment of the cis
compound is 3.0–3.5 D.8 This large conformational change
induced by isomerization is reversible. In case 1, it was ob-
served that the initial state of surface azobenzene monolayer,
which exhibits the trans conformation with the molecular
area Aϳ0.4 nm2, with the transmittance of a He–Ne laser
beam undergoes the trans-cis, cis-trans, trans-cis, and cis-
trans sequences of the isomerizations, at the different values
of the voltages V across both 6Az10PVA+5CB and
6Az10PVA films. In case 2, the initial state of surface
azobenzene monolayer exhibits the cis conformation ͑A
ϳ1.2 nm2͒, and with the transmittance of the laser beam
undergoes the inverse, to case 1, sequence of the photoi-
somerization changes.
It should be pointed out that the voltage V across the
5CB film on 6Az10PVA monolayer, caused by UV illumina-
tion, generates a positive charge density range in the interval
of 1.66ϫ10−3 C/m2ഛഛ11.25ϫ10−3 C/m2, whereas the
voltage V across the 6Az10PVA film on Al electrode gener-
ates a negative charge density range in the interval of
−7.74ϫ10−3 C/m2ഛഛ−0.77ϫ10−3 C/m2, respectively.
The surface charge density in ϳ10−3 C/m2 corresponds to
a surface ion concentration nsurf=/e=6.25ϫ10+15 m−2,
which is in agreement with the experimental data nsurf
Ϸ1015−1016 m−2.9 Here e is the proton charge.
͑A͒ with respect to the unit vector k directed perpendicu-
eq
ˆ
lar to the interface. The unit vector i is directed to be parallel
to the interface with the distance x, whereas z is the distance
away from the air-azobenzene interface ͑see Fig. 1͒. We use
the molecular model which takes into account the interaction
between the surface polarization ͑SP͒ and the surface electric
field originating from surface charges density . In the sim-
plest case that electric field can be written in the form
The surface pressure −A isothermal diagram, both for
trans and cis conformations of 6Az10PVA monolayer, is
shown in Fig. 3.
To produce the trans form, the monolayer of 6Az10PVA
was spread in the absence of light and the cis form was
140.254.87.149 On: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 03:52:21