.
Angewandte
Communications
symmetric and easily accessible sites for substitution. We
envision that the new dibromide derivative BFI-Br2 will
become an important intermediate for the design and syn-
thesis of new organic/polymer semiconductors.
Scheme 1 presents the synthesis of BFI and its derivatives.
Starting from acenaphthene (1), the diketo intermediates 2-
(2-hexyldecyl)-1H-indeno[6,7,1-def]isoquinoline-1,3,6,7(2H)-
tetraone and 2-(2-decyltetradecyl)-1H-indeno[6,7,1-def]iso-
quinoline-1,3,6,7(2H)-tetraone (5 and 8) were synthesized in
four steps. 1,2-Diketone is well-known to readily react with
ortho-arylenediamine to form a pyrazine ring.[8] By taking
advantage of this reaction, BFI (6) and BFI-Br2 (9) were
synthesized in the reactions of 5 with 1,2,4,5-benzenetetra-
amine tetrahydrochloride and 8 with 3,6-dibromobenzene-
1,2,4,5-tetraamine, respectively. The reaction of the key
precursor BFI-Br2 with 2-tributylstannylthiophene or 5-
methyl-2-trimethylstannylthiophene under standard Stille
cross-coupling reaction conditions afforded BFI-T2 (com-
pound 10-T2) and BFI-TM2 (compound 10-TM2), respec-
tively. The dicyano derivative BFI-CN2 (10-CN2) was pre-
pared by the reaction of BFI-Br2 with CuCN in DMF. BFI-T2
and BFI-TM2 were isolated as green solids, and BFI-CN2 was
isolated as a yellow solid. The parent BFI has a poor solubility
in aprotic organic solvents, but can be dissolved in organic
acids (e.g. trifluoroacetic acid) or organic solvent/organic acid
solvent mixtures. With two bromo groups, BFI-Br2 has
moderate solubility and can be dissolved in warm organic
solvents. Fortunately, attachment of substituent groups dra-
matically enhances the solubility of the BFI derivatives. BFI-
CN2, BFI-T2, and BFI-TM2 all have good solubility in
organic solvents (chloroform, dichloromethane, toluene, etc.).
Thermogravimetric analysis showed that all the molecules
are thermally stable with high thermal decomposition tem-
peratures (Td ꢀ 4008C; Figure S6 and Table S2 in the Sup-
porting Information). Differential scanning calorimetry
(DSC) showed that the parent BFI (6) has no detectable
phase transitions in the temperature range from 308C to
2508C, whereas BFI-T2, BFI-TM2, and BFI-CN2 each
exhibited multiple melting and liquid-crystalline transitions
(Figure S7 and Table S2 in the Supporting Information). The
high thermal stability of BFI arises from the dense packing of
the large planar backbones and strong intermolecular inter-
actions induced by the polar imide groups and the imine
nitrogen atoms. On the other hand, the substituents on BFI-
CN2, BFI-T2, and BFI-TM2 increase the free space between
the molecular backbones and enable the observed thermal
transitions.
Figure 1. Crystal structure of BFI. a) Thermal ellipsoid plot with ellip-
soids drawn at 50% probability level. b) Face-to-face p–p stacking with
À
an interplanar distance of 3.24 ꢀ. c) C H···O hydrogen bonding
between stacks (dashed lines in red circle).
nitrogen atoms. The neighboring BFI molecules feature
a short vertical distance of 3.24 ꢀ, which is significantly
shorter than the interplanar distance of graphite (3.35 ꢀ)[10]
and suggests strong p–p interactions (Figure 1b). Further-
more, we found that p–p stacking is not the only driving force
that controls the assembly of BFI molecules. Figure 1c shows
À
another type of close contacts, C H···O hydrogen bonds,
which are shorter than the sum of van der Waals radii and
exist between the neighboring stacks. In these hydrogen
bonds, the oxygen atom on the carbonyl group and the ortho-
carbon atom on the naphthalene ring of the neighboring
molecule function as the hydrogen acceptor and donor,
respectively. The H···O distance is measured to be 2.44 ꢀ and
the C-H···O angle to be 140.18. Both the rigid planar structure
and strong intermolecular interactions are highly desirable for
achieving high crystallinity, high degree of molecular orbital
coupling, and efficient carrier transport.
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis of BFI (Figure 1)
showed that the BFI molecules are aligned in a triclinic unit
cell with a = 4.681(4) ꢀ, b = 16.30(2) ꢀ, c = 17.554(16) ꢀ, a =
94.08(5)8, b = 93.92(3)8, g = 95.36(6)8.[9] The polycyclic BFI
ring has a planar geometry involving both the diimide groups
and tetraazabenzodifluoranthene backbone (Figure 1a). The
molecules of BFI form a slipped face-to-face p–p stacking,
and the displacement between two neighboring molecules is
less than one sixth of the length of the molecule; this ratio is
relatively smaller than that of the NDI and PDI molecules,[4d,i]
which might be due to the much longer length of BFI and
stronger intermolecular interactions induced by the imine
X-ray quality single crystals of BFI-T2, BFI-TM2, or BFI-
CN2 could not be obtained under normal solution conditions.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) from solution-cast films was thus
used to evaluate the crystallinity of this series of molecules.
The intense first Bragg reflection and its higher-order
reflections from BFI films were observed at 3.08, 9.38, 12.38,
18.58, and 21.28 corresponding to a d-spacing of 2.9 nm, which
is close to the length of the long axis of the BFI molecules and
thus is assigned to the edge-to-edge packing of the BFI
molecules along the long axis (Figure S8 in the Supporting
Information). BFI-T2 and BFI-TM2 exhibit similar X-ray
2
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!