Organic Process Research & Development 2007, 11, 19−24
Development of a Scalable Synthesis of a Common Eastern Tricyclic Lactone
for Construction of the Nodulisporic Acids
Amos B. Smith, III,* La´szlo´ Ku¨rti, Akin H. Davulcu, and Young Shin Cho
Department of Chemistry, Monell Chemical Senses Center and Laboratory for Research on the Structure of Matter,
UniVersity of PennsylVania, Philadelphia, PennsylVania 19104, U.S.A.
Abstract:
A scalable, second-generation synthesis of the densely func-
tionalized eastern tricyclic lactone (+)-6, a common intermedi-
ate, for construction of the nodulisporic acids has been achieved.
Modifications to the first-generation route now permit access
to (+)-6 in 17 steps with an overall 16.5% yield. Key carbon-
carbon bond constructions include a Kirk-Petrow (phenylthio)-
methylation, a Sc(OTf)3-catalyzed hydroxymethylation, a Stille
carbonylation, and a Koga three-component, conjugate addi-
tion-alkylation sequence.
Introduction
(+)-Nodulisporic acid A (1), the most complex member
of the nodulisporane class of indole diterpenoids, was first
isolated by Ondeyka and co-workers at the Merck Research
Laboratories as part of an extensive screening program to
identify structurally unique, biologically active natural
products (Figure 1).1 The nodulisporic acids comprise a
Figure 1. Representative nodulisporic acid congeners.
thus launched at Merck & Co. to develop (+)-1 as a novel
anti-flea therapeutic agent for companion animals. To date
family of potent insecticides particularly effective against
flea and tick infestations in dogs and cats.2 Nodulisporic acid
A [(+)-1] was found to be the most potent nodulisporane,
displaying a 10-fold greater systemic adulticidal efficacy than
ivermectin against the Ctenocephalides felis (common flea),
a commercially relevant flea target.
over 1000 synthetic analogues have been prepared.4,5
Given our long-standing interest in the total synthesis of
indole diterpenoids, in conjunction with the architectural
complexity and remarkable antiparasitic activity of (+)-
nodulisporic acid A (1), we initiated a synthetic program to
devise a modular synthetic strategy that would permit
construction not only of the parent nodulisporic acid A [(+)-
1] but also a number of analogues not readily accessible by
chemical modification of the naturally occurring indole
diterpenoids (i.e., the nodulisporanes). At the outset of this
program, the cornerstone of our modular synthetic strategy
was envisioned to involve the indole synthetic protocol6,7
developed in our laboratory and successfully employed to
construct a number of related indole diterpenoid natural
products, including penitrem D8 and 21-isopentenylpaxilline.9
From the retrosynthetic perspective (Scheme 1), application
The closely related nodulisporic acids B, D, and F (cf. 2,
3, and 4) proved to be less active by 5 to >100-fold.
Importantly, (+)-nodulisporic acid A (1) displays no apparent
toxicity to the host animal while effectively killing fleas
subsequent to their ingestion of a blood meal. The mode of
action of the nodulisporic acids involves modulation of the
invertebrate-specific, glutamate-gated, chloride ion channels
not present in mammals.3 However, extensive biological
evaluation revealed that, although (+)-1 possessed good in
vivo and in vitro activity, the stability and pharmacokinetic
profile were not optimal. A medicinal chemistry campaign,
in conjunction with a chemical mutagenesis program, was
(4) Chakravarty, P. K.; Shih, T. L.; Colletti, S. L.; Ayer, M. B.; Snedden, C.;
Kuo, H.; Tyagarajan, S.; Gregory, L.; Zakson-Aiken, M.; Shoop, W. L.;
Schmatz, D. M.; Wyvratt, M.; Fisher, M. H.; Meinke, P. T. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 147-150.
(5) Ok, D.; Li, C.; Shih, T. L.; Salva, S.; Ayer, M. B.; Colletti, S. L.;
Chakravarty, P. K.; Wyvratt, M. J.; Fisher, M. H.; Gregory, L.; Zakson-
Aiken, M.; Shoop, W. L.; Schmatz, D. M.; Meinke, P. T. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 1751-1754.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: smithab@
sas.upenn.edu.
(1) Ondeyka, J. G.; Helms, G. L.; Hensens, O. D.; Goetz, M. A.; Zink, D. L.;
Tsipouras, A.; Shoop, W. L.; Slayton, L.; Dombrowski, A. W.; Polishook,
J. D.; Ostlind, D. A.; Tsou, N. N.; Ball, R. G.; Singh, S. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 8809-8816.
(2) Sings, H.; Singh, S. In The Alkaloids: Chemistry and Biology; Cordell, G.
A., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, CA, United States, 2003;
Vol. 60, pp 51-163.
(6) Smith, A. B., III; Visnick, M.; Haseltine, J. N.; Sprengeler, P. A. Tetrahedron
1986, 42, 2957-2969.
(3) Ludmerer, S. W.; Warren, V. A.; Williams, B. S.; Zheng, Y.; Hunt, D. C.;
Ayer, M. B.; Wallace, M. A.; Chaudhary, A. G.; Egan, M. A.; Meinke, P.
T.; Dean, D. C.; Garcia, M. L.; Cully, D. F.; Smith, M. M. Biochemistry
(Mosc). 2002, 41, 6548-6560.
(7) Smith, A. B., III; Visnick, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 3757-3760.
(8) Smith, A. B., III; Kanoh, N.; Ishiyama, H.; Hartz, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 11254-11255.
(9) Smith, A. B., III; Cui, H. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 587-590.
10.1021/op060204l CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 12/23/2006
Vol. 11, No. 1, 2007 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
19