754
P.-T. Chou et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 370 (2003) 747–755
3.5. Energetics during a proton transfer cycle
is of fundamental importance. For DISA the study
of T01 ! T1 tautomerism is not feasible due to the
highly endergonic process. Further approach
aimed at designing ESIPT molecules so that both
dynamics and thermodynamics of the T01 ! T1
tautomerism are accessible is in progress.
With the above spectroscopic data, an attempt
has been made to construct an energy diagram for
DISA in a proton transfer cycle. Applying Eq. (2)
the average S01 ! S00 and T10 ! S00 gaps were de-
duced to be 18 034 and 13 985 cmꢂ1, respectively.
Conversely, the absorption maximum of 360 nm
(27 778 cmꢂ1) was adopted for the S1 state. The T1
state of the enol conformer (E) is not available due
to its negligible population efficiency. Alterna-
tively, the average phosphorescence frequency
(21357 cm ꢂ1) of the E0 conformer was taken to be
the normal T1 state. Finally, the relative energy
between conformers E and K in the ground-state is
experimentally inaccessible, and has to be obtained
through the theoretical approach. The large spin–
orbit-coupling factor limits precise ab initio cal-
culations at higher-level basis sets. Alternatively, a
semi-empirical PM3 method was performed, esti-
mating the S00 state to be higher in energy than S0
by 13.67 kcal/mol. Accordingly, relative energy
levels for an overall proton transfer cycle in DISA
References
[1] E.M. Kosower, D. Huppert, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 37
(1986) 127.
[2] Special Issue (P.F. Barbara, H.D. Trommsdorff (Eds.),
Spectroscopy and Dynamics of Elementary Proton Trans-
fer in Polyatomic systems), Chem. Phys. 136 (1989)
153.
[3] S.F. Formosinho, L.G. Arnaut, J. Photochem. Photobiol.
A Chem. 75 (1993) 21.
[4] A. Douhal, F. Lahmani, A.H. Zewail, Chem. Phys. 207
(1996) 477.
[5] S. Scheiner, J. Phys. Chem. A 104 (2000) 5898.
[6] F. Parsapour, D.F. Kelley, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 2791.
[7] A. Sytnik, M. Kasha, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91(1994)
8627.
[8] P.T. Chou, D. McMorrow, T.J. Aartsma, M. Kasha,
J. Phys. Chem. 88 (1984) 4596.
are depicted in Scheme 1. The S1 ! S0 tautomer-
1
ꢀ
[9] A.V. Acuna, F. Amat-Guerri, J. Catalan, A. Costella,
J. Figuera, J. Munoz, Chem. Phys. Lett. 132 (1986) 576.
ism is thermally allowed by ꢀ14.2 kcal/mol. The
T1 state of the enol form is estimated to be ꢀ7.4
kcal/mol higher in energy than the T01 state of the
keto-tautomer. This value has to be treated as an
upper limit since T1 of the HB conformer E is in
general lower in energy than that of the non-HB
conformer E0, resulting in a reduction of the T1–T01
gap.
ꢀ
[10] J. Catalan, J.C. del Valle, R.M. Claramunt, D. Sanz,
J. Dotor, J. Lumin. 68 (1996) 165.
[11] A.D. Roshal, A.V. Grigorovich, A.O. Doroshenko, V.G.
Pivovarenko, J. Phys. Chem. A 102 (1998) 5907.
[12] C.L. Renschler, L.A. Harrah, Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys.
Rev., A 235, Sept., U.S. Patent, 1985, 635.
[13] A.Z. Weller, Elektrochemistry 60 (1956) 1144.
[14] M.F.R. Prieto, B. Nickel, K.H. Grellmann, A. Mordzinski,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 146 (1988) 387.
In conclusion, we have applied internal heavy-
atom effects and an ultrasensitive near-IR detect-
ing system to study the energetics and dynamics of
the low-lying triplet states for ESIPT molecules.
TRTL was proven to be a direct, feasible method
to obtain the yield of the triplet state, and conse-
quently the radiative decay rate can be extracted.
The results lead to the establishment of relative
energy levels for an overall proton-transfer cycle of
DISA in different spin manifolds. While the oc-
currence of proton transfer has been widely ac-
cepted in the 1ppà state [1–5], it has been proposed
that hydrogen-atom rather than proton transfer
takes place in the triplet states [5,14,15,30]. Thus,
whether the triplet-state hydrogen-atom transfer is
operative and can be generalized in other systems
[15] K.H. Grellmann, A. Mordzinski, A. Heinrich, Chem. Phys.
136 (1989) 201.
[16] P.T. Chou, S.L. Studer, M.L. Martinez, Chem. Phys. Lett.
178 (1991) 393.
[17] A. Grabowska, P. Borowicz, D.O. Martire, S.E. Braslav-
sky, Chem. Phys. Lett. 185 (1991) 206.
ꢀ
[18] J. Catalan, C. Diaz, J. Phys. Chem. A 102 (1998) 323.
[19] S.P. McGlynn, T. Azumi, M. Kinoshita, in: Molecular
Spectroscopy of the Triplet State, Prentice Hall, Engle-
wood Cliffs, NJ, 1969, p. 18.
[20] W. Sieband, J. Chem. Phys. 47 (1967) 2411.
€
[21] W. Klopffer, Adv. Photochem. 10 (1977) 311.
[22] P.T. Chou, G.R. Wu, Y.I. Liu, W.S. Yu, C.S. Chiou,
J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002) 5967.
[23] S. Nagaoka, N. Hiorta, M. Sumitani, K. Yoshihara, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 105 (1983) 4220.
[24] S. Nagaoka, U. Nagashima, N. Ohta, M. Fujita, T.
Takemura, J. Phys. Chem. 92 (1988) 166.