which has a broad scope with respect to the precursor
propargylic alcohols used, enabling the synthesis of alle-
nylphosphonates with various substitution patterns in the
allene moiety. Despite these, the approach suffers from a
serious drawback, namely, a limit in the kind of substituent
that can be attached to the phosphonate center.
Table 1. Synthesis of Allenylphosphonates and Related
Compounds
a
To overcome this limitation and to explore new avenues
to carbon-phosphorus bond formation, we turned our
attention to a completely unexplored, in this context, transi-
tion-metal-catalyzed propargylic substitution (S 2′) reaction
N
as a means of synthesis of allenylphosphonates. Although
this is a well established synthetic approach to a variety of
1,8
allenes, the reaction has never been used for the formation
of the C-P bond. We expected that stereoselectivity and
chirality transfer from the propargylic substrate observed
1
during some allene synthesis would also be preserved for
phosphorus nucleophiles. Since other Pd-catalyzed C-P
9
bond-forming reactions have been shown to work well in
the synthesis of biologically important phosphorus com-
1
0
pounds, and mechanistic aspects of the reaction with aryl
1
1
electrophiles have been studied in depth, we expected that
these may lend themselves to a new method for the
construction of complex allenylphosphonate derivatives.
Herein we report for the first time studies on a palladium-
catalyzed propargylic substitution reaction with H-phospho-
nates and related compounds as nucleophiles. Our aim was
to develop a new synthetic method for this class of
compounds and expand the scope of accessible allenylphos-
phonates, particularly those of potential biochemical rel-
evance.
As a model reaction we chose coupling between propargyl
chloride and diethyl H-phosphonate (Table 1, entry 1). The
screening revealed that only bidentate ligands with wide bite
angles were able to promote a conversion into the alle-
nylphosphonate, and the highest reaction rate was observed
for bis(2-phenylphosphinophenyl)ether (DPEPhos) (see Sup-
porting Information).
a
Reagents and conditions: 1.38 mmol of propargylic substrate, 1.25
The scope of the reaction turned out to be broad in terms
of propargyl derivatives and the H-phosphonates used, as it
was apparent from synthesis of allenylphosphonates with
diverse structural features (Table 1).
mmol of P-nucleophile, 0.019 mmol (1.5 mol %) of Pd
mmol (3 mol %) of DPEPhos, 5 mL of THF (0.25 M), 68 °C. For
propargylic chlorides, additionally 1.5 mmol of Et N.
2
(dba)
3
3
·CHCl , 0.038
3
In this reaction propargyl chlorides showed relatively high
reactivity that did not depend on the presence or absence of
substituents at C1 (Table 1, entry 1 vs 3 and 8). Propargyl
carbonates did not require an external base and exhibited
significant differences in rates between primary vs secondary
substrates (entry 2 vs 4), with the latter one reacting much
faster (7 h vs 30 min). A substituent in the terminal position
(
8) Ma, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 1175–1183. Tsuji, J.; Mandai, T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 2589–2612
9) Prim, D.; Campagne, J.-M.; Joseph, D.; Andrioletti, B. Tetrahedron
002, 58, 2041–2075. Schwan, A. L. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33, 218–224.
Montchamp, J. L. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 2388–2406.
10) Abbas, S.; Hayes, C. J. Synlett 1999, 7, 1124–1126. Abbas, S.;
.
(
2
3
of the alkyne (R ) dramatically slowed down the reaction
(
for both the leaving groups, and a good conversion to the
corresponding allenylphosphonate could only be achieved
for the carbonate derivative (entry 5 vs 6). However,
introduction of substituents at C1 significantly increased
the reactivity of this type of substrate (entries 7 and 9). The
coupling reaction was sensitive to steric hindrance at the
phosphorus center as it is apparent from entry 10 vs 1 in
Table 1. Other phosphorus nucleophiles, e.g., phosphinate
esters, could also be used in this reaction (entries 11-13) to
produce the corresponding allenylphosphinates. Although the
last two products could also technically be obtained using
Bertram, R. D.; Hayes, C. J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3365–3367. Johansson, T.;
Stawinski, J. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2564–2565. Lav e´ n, G.; Stawinski, J.
Collect. Symp. Ser. 2005, 7, 195–199. Kalek, M.; Stawinski, J. Collect.
Symp. Ser. 2008, 10, 214–218. Kalek, M.; Ziadi, A.; Stawinski, J. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 4637–4640. Kalek, M.; Jezowska, M.; Stawinski, J. AdV.
Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 3207–3216.
(
11) Kalek, M.; Stawinski, J. Organometallics 2007, 26, 5840–5848.
Kalek, M.; Stawinski, J. Organometallics 2008, 27, 5876–5888. Levine,
A. M.; Stockland, R. A.; Clark, R.; Guzei, I. Organometallics 2002, 21,
3
278–3284. Stockland, R. A.; Levine, A. M.; Giovine, M. T.; Guzei, I. A.;
Cannistra, J. C. Organometallics 2004, 23, 647–656. Kohler, M. C.;
Stockland, R. A., Jr.; Rath, N. P. Organometallics 2006, 25, 5746–5756.
Kohler, M. C.; Grimes, T. V.; Wang, X.; Cundari, T. R.; Stockland, R. A.
Organometallics 2009, 29, 1193–1201.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 20, 2010
4703