Organic Letters
Letter
The ion transport mechanism was determined using the
most efficient macrocycle, 2. It was intriguing that although the
macrocycle transported chloride ions, no internal pH increase
was observed in the HPTS assay (Figure 2a). In contrast to the
other assays in Figure 2, the HPTS assay did not have a
chloride gradient. Hence, HPTS assays with varying internal
and external buffer solutions were carried out to understand
the role of anions in the transport process (Figures 3a and S5).
counterion. (Figure 3c). The ion transport rates were
unaffected by the nature of the cation, further substantiating
the fact that cations were not involved in the transport process.
Dose−response studies were carried out using the HPTS
assay with a chloride gradient (Figure S6).37 The plots were
fitted to the Hill equation (eq S2) to obtain the EC50 value, i.e.,
the concentration of macrocycle required for half the
maximum activity (Figure 4a). The EC50 value for macrocycle
Figure 3. Assays to determine the mechanism of chloride transport
(symport/antiport). (a) HPTS assays carried out with variation of the
internal and external buffers to compare rates of Cl− transport (54.1
μM macrocycle 2). (b) Comparison of chloride and nitrate transport
using the NMDG assay (54.1 μM macrocycle 2). (c) Lucigenin assay
to compare the effects of cations on chloride transport (21.64 μM
macrocycle 2).
Figure 4. Mode of macrocycle−lipid interaction. (a) Hill analyses of
macrocycles. (b) U-tube experiment to distinguish between carrier
and channel mechanisms (1 mM macrocycle in the organic phase).
(c) Possible modes of pore formation by macrocycle 2.
The rate constants for ion transport were obtained by fitting
the curves to a first-order exponential decay equation (eq S1).
The maximum k values were observed when vesicles contained
2 (29.2 μM) was found to be 2.3 times lower than that for
macrocycle 3 (69.4 μM). The Hill coefficient of 1.6 indicated
that on an average a single ion was associated with one
macrocycle. The macrocycle could function as a carrier, form a
monomolecular pore or a stacked pore to accomplish this. The
classical U-tube experiment was used to determine whether the
macrocycle behaved as an ion carrier in the membrane (Figure
4b). The U-tube contained two aqueous layers separated by an
organic phase. The donating aqueous arm of the U-tube
contained NaCl, and the receiving arm contained water.
Macrocycle 2 was dissolved in the organic phase. The
concentration of chloride ions in the receiving arm did not
increase with time, suggesting that macrocycle 2 did not
function as an ion carrier and presumably formed a pore in the
membrane. The computed electrostatic potential surface of
macrocycle 1 (Figure S7) shows that the aromatic units being
electron-deficient substituents can participate in anion−π
interactions. The structures of macrocycles 1 and 2 bound
with chloride ions (Figure S8) show that the amide NH bonds
in the macrocycle can selectively bind with chloride ions via
hydrogen bonding, similar to 2,6-diamidopyridyl-derived anion
receptors.47−50 The chloride selectivity can also be explained
by the trend of Cl¯ > Br¯ > I¯ seen for anion−π interactions.51
Cl− inside and NO3 outside (a in Figure 3a). This suggests
−
that chloride efflux is the driving force for influx of hydroxide
ions, which increases the internal pH. The transport rate was
lower when chloride was outside the vesicles and nitrate was
inside (b in Figure 3a), suggesting that the macrocycle
preferred to transport chloride over nitrate ions. The rates of
ion transport were lowest in the HPTS assays without an anion
gradient, (c and d in Figure 3a). To compare the rates of Cl−
−
and NO3 transport, the HPTS assay was carried out using a
buffer containing N-methyl-D-glucamine (NMDG) chloride or
nitrate (Figure 3b).46 The pH gradient was introduced in the
system by the addition of NMDGOH. The only cations
present in the medium were the large membrane-impermeable
NMDG ions and protons. Gramicidin A was introduced into
the system to carry out H+ efflux. In such a scenario, the
macrocycle behaves as a uniporter carrying out Cl− or NO3
−
transport exclusively. The rate of Cl− transport was found to be
higher than that of NO3− transport. This observation is also in
line with rate constants observed for the HPTS assay (Figure
3a). To rule out the possibility of metal−halide cotransport,
the lucigenin assay was carried out by varying the metal
C
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX