Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.8 (2004)
995
cyclic hydrogen bonding belts around the urea terminus in
chloroform. The formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonds
of 1-S is responsible for the unique CD phenomena, because
the CD band of 1-S at 280 nm was weakened to ca. 42% in inten-
sity in chloroform–methanol (92:8 v/v) and completely disap-
peared in chloroform–methanol (3:97 v/v). Methanol acts as a
competitor for the intramolecular hydrogen bonding formations.
A similar asymmetric character was observed for 1-R having in-
verted CD signs in chloroform (Figure 2).
ing constants (K) for 1:1 host–guest complexes were evaluated
on the basis of the computer-aided least squares curve fitting
methods applied to the NMR data (K; 1000 and 600 Mꢁ1 for
chloride and bromide, respectively). Interestingly, the CD bands
of 1-S at 280 nm was weakened to ca. 70% in intensity in the
presence of chloride (3 equiv.) and disappeared in the presence
of an excess amount of chloride (36 equiv.) These results sug-
gested that the encapsulated guest anions disrupted the formation
of intramolecular hydrogen bonds of 1-S, as schematically
shown in Figure 1, so that the resulting complexes did not show
any CD phenomena at 280 nm. Similar complexation behavior
of 1-R with the anions was also confirmed by the identical meth-
ods (Figure 2d).
3000
(a)
(b)
1500
In conclusion, resorcinarene-type hosts bearing eight (R)-
and (S)-methylbenzylurea residues 1-R and 1-S form a self-fold-
ed conformation originating from the intramolecular hydrogen-
bonding interactions and exhibit the unique CD phenomena on
the macrocyclic skeleton in chloroform. The guest-binding be-
havior toward anions such as chloride and bromide were moni-
(c)
(d)
0
(b)
θ
-1500
-3000
(a)
(d)
1
tored by the changes in CD band intensity as well as H NMR
250
300
Wavelength / nm
350
spectroscopy. The guest-binding sites of these hosts are close
to the chiral residues, so that these hosts are expected to perform
chiral recognition toward molecular anions. Further studies are
currently in progress along this line.
Figure 2. CD spectra of 1-S (a), 1-R (b), 7-S (c), and 1-R in the
presence of chloride (36 equiv.) (d) in chloroform at 298 K.
An intrinsic potential of 1 to act as a host9 for anion inclu-
sion has been investigated by 1H NMR and CD10 spectroscopy.
Upon addition of chloride (as a tetrabutylammonium salt) to a
This study was supported by Shorai Foundation for Science
and Technology. We thank reviewers for their valuable com-
ments on the CD spectra of 1.
1
CDCl3 solution containing 1-S, the H NMR signal due to the
urea protons of 1-S were sharpened and underwent substantial
downfield shifts in the presence of chloride, showing a simple
saturation behavior for the complexation as shown in Figure 3.
References and Notes
a) A. G. S. Hogberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102, 6046 (1980). b) A. G. S.
¨
1
Hogberg, J. Org. Chem., 45, 4498 (1980). For a review, see: c) P.
¨
Timmerman, W. Verboom, and D. N. Reinhoudt, Tetrahedron, 52,
2663 (1996).
D. J. Cram, Science, 219, 1177 (1983).
(a)
4.90
2
3
a) D. M. Rudkevich, G. Hilmersson, and J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 120, 12216 (1998). b) J. W. M. Nissink, H. Boerrigter, W.
Verboom, D. N. Reinhoudt, and J. H. van der Maas, J. Chem. Soc., Per-
kin Trans. 2, 1998, 2541. c) D. M. Rudkevich and J. Rebek, Jr., Eur. J.
Org. Chem., 1999, 1991. d) T. Haino, D. M. Rudkevich, A. Shivanyuk,
K. Rissanen, and J. Rebek, Jr., Chem.—Eur. J., 6, 3797 (2000).
a) Y. Murakami, J. Kikuchi, T. Ohno, O. Hayashida, and M. Kojima,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 7672 (1990). b) S. Saito, C. Nucklls, and
J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 9628 (2000).
4.85
(b)
4.80
4
5
0.0
5.0
5.2
5.0
4.8
δ / ppm
4.6
4.4
4.2
+
−
[Bu N Cl ] / mM
4
1-R; 600 MHz 1H NMR (CDCl3, 298 K) ꢀ 0.86, 1.23–1.28, 1.35, 1.75,
2.0, 3.0, 3.2, 4.46, 4.81, 5.7–6.4, 7.15, 7.2. MS (FAB) m=z 3533
½M þ Hꢂþ. Found: C, 69.68; H, 8.86; N, 8.99%. Calcd for
.
Figure 3. Partial 1H NMR spectra of 1-S in CDCl3 at 298 K in
the absence (a) and presence of chloride (36 equiv.) (b). Inset;
the corresponding NMR titration curve.
C
208H312N24O24 3H2O: C, 69.55; H, 8.94; N, 9.37%. 1-S; 600 MHz
1H NMR (CDCl3, 298 K) ꢀ 0.86, 1.23–1.28, 1.35, 1.75, 2.0, 3.0, 3.2,
4.46, 4.81, 5.7–6.4, 7.15, 7.2. MS (FAB) m=z 3533 ½M þ Hꢂþ. Found:
.
C, 69.81; H, 8.80; N, 9.12%. Calcd for C208H312N24O24 3H2O: C,
0.06
0.03
69.55; H, 8.94; N, 9.37%.
A. D. Carr, R. Melendez, S. J. Geib, and A. D. Hamilton, Tetrahedron
Lett., 39, 7447 (1998).
6
7
8
T. Kobayashi and T. Seki, Langmuir, 19, 9297 (2003).
Monomeric dispersion of 1 was also suggested by NMR spectroscopy
without showing any detectable concentration-dependency on the
chemical shifts of urea protons of 1 within the concentration range
of 0.1–2.4 mM.
0.5
1.0
0
f = [1-S] / ([1-S] + [Cl-])
Figure 4. Job plot for a combination of 1-S and chloride.
9
P. D. Beer and P. A. Gale, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 40, 486 (2001).
10 Resorcinarene 2 binds chiral alcohols in chloroform and the resulting
host–guest complexes show CD bands with split Cotton effects: K.
Kobayashi, Y. Asakawa, Y. Kikuchi, H. Toi, and Y. Aoyama, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 115, 2648 (1993).
The stoichiometry for the complex was confirmed to be 1:1
host–guest11 by Job plot (Figure 4). These results indicate again
that 1 has a self-folding cavity suitable for binding an anion
within, as schematically shown in Figure 1. Similar complexa-
tion behavior of 1-S was also confirmed with bromide. The bind-
ꢁ
ꢁ
.
.
11 MS peaks for the complexes of 1-S Cl and 1-S Br were directly
detected by FAB spectrometry; m=z 3568 ½M þ Clꢂꢁ, 3613 ½M þ Brꢂꢁ.
Published on the web (Advance View) July 5, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.994