A Highly Selective Fluorescent and Colorimetric Chemosensor for ZnII
= 79.464(3)°, β = 80.073(3)°, γ = 81.045(3), V = 1718.62(16) Å3, Z
the absorbance of L1-treated cells to the absorbance of control
= 2, ρcalcd. = 1.238 gcm–3, R(reflections) = 0.0591(3051), wR2(re- cells.
flections) = 0.0974(6351). CCDC-825020 contains the supplemen-
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Materials and general methods; schematic molecular struc-
tures; experimental details; additional NMR and ESI-MS data.
tary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be ob-
tained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data
Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
Preparation of 2-Chloro-N-(quinol-8-yl)acetamide: To a cooled,
stirred solution of 8-aminoquinoline (288 mg, 2.0 mmol) and pyr-
idine (0.23 mL, 2.8 mmol) was added a chloroform (10 mL) solu-
tion of 2-chloroacetyl chloride (0.15 mL, 2.0 mmol) dropwise over
1 h. After 2 h at room temperature, a brown-yellow solid was ob-
tained by removing the solvent under reduced pressure. The crude
product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using
dichloromethane as eluent to afford 2-chloro-N-(quinol-8-yl)acet-
amide (362 mg, 80%).
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for
the Central University (Lzujbky-2011-18), the Foundation of Key
Laboratory of Nonferrous Metals Chemistry and Resources Utili-
zation of Gansu Province, and the State Key Laboratory of Applied
Organic Chemistry.
[1] a) A. P. De Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugsson,
A. J. M. Huxley, C. P. McCoy, J. T. Rademacher, T. E. Rice,
Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1515; b) L. Prodi, F. Bolletta, M. Mon-
talti, N. Zaccheroni, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 59; c) J. S.
Kim, D. T. Quang, Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3780; d) H. N. Kim,
M. H. Lee, H. J. Kim, J. S. Kim, J. Yoon, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008,
37, 1465.
[2] a) B. Valeur, I. Leray, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 3; b) K.
Rurack, U. Resch-Genger, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 116; c) V.
Amendola, L. Fabbrizzi, F. Forti, M. Licchelli, C. Mangano,
P. Pallavicini, A. Poggi, D. Sacchi, A. Taglieti, Coord. Chem.
Rev. 2006, 250, 273.
[3] a) A. W. Czarnik, Fluorescent Chemosensors for Ion and Mole-
cule Recognition, American Chemical Society, Washington,
DC, 1993; b) A. P. de Silva, D. B. Fox, A. J. M. Huxley, T. S.
Moody, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 41; c) Q. W. He, E. W.
Miller, A. P. Wong, C. J. Chang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
9316.
[4] a) T. V. O’Halloran, Science 1993, 261, 715; b) J. Y. Koh, S. W.
Suh, B. J. Gwag, Y. Y. He, C. Y. Hsu, D. W. Choi, Science 1996,
272, 1013; c) F. Walker, R. E. Black, Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2004, 24,
255; d) C. J. Frederickson, A. I. Bush, Biometals 2001, 14, 353.
[5] a) K. Kiyose, H. Kojima, Y. Urano, T. Nagano, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 6548; b) K. Komatsu, Y. Urano, H. Kojima, T.
Nagano, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 13447; c) C. R. Gold-
smith, S. J. Lippard, Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 555; d) B. A. Wong,
S. Friedle, S. J. Lippard, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7142; e)
A. E. Dennis, R. C. Smith, Chem. Commun. 2007, 4641; f) J. F.
Zhu, H. Yuan, W. H. Chan, A. W. M. Lee, Org. Biomol. Chem.
2010, 8, 3957; g) Z. C. Xu, J. Y. Yoon, D. R. Spring, Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1996; h) Z. C. Xu, K. H. Baek, H. N. Kim,
J. N. Cui, X. H. Qian, D. R. Spring, I. Shin, J. Yoon, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 601; i) Z. C. Xu, G. H. Kim, S. J. Han,
M. J. Jou, C. Lee, I. Shin, J. Yoon, Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2307.
[6] K. Rurack, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 2001, 57, 2161.
[7] P. Jiang, Z. J. Guo, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 205.
[8] a) I. B. Mahadevan, M. C. Kimber, S. F. Lincoln, E. R. Tiek-
ink, A. D. Ward, W. H. Betts, I. J. Forbes, P. D. Zalewski, Aust.
J. Chem. 1996, 49, 561; b) P. D. Zalewski, I. J. Forbes, W. H.
Betts, Biochem. J. 1993, 296, 403; c) C. J. Frederickson, E. J.
Kasarskis, D. Ringo, R. E. Frederickson, J. Neurosci. Methods
1987, 20, 91; d) C. J. Frederickson, J. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 1989,
31, 145.
Preparation of L1: 2-Chloro-N-(quinol-8-yl)acetamide (110 mg,
0.5 mmol), N-(rhodamine-6G)lactam-ethylenediamine (228 mg,
0.5 mmol), and potassium iodide (8 mg) were dissolved in acetoni-
trile (30 mL) with stirring and heated to reflux under nitrogen for
10 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature, and the solvent
was removed under reduced pressure to obtain a pale-yellow solid,
which was purified by silica gel column chromatography using
dichloromethane/petroleum ether (5:1, v/v) as eluent to afford L1.
Yield: 83.8%. 1H NMR (400 MHz): δ = 11.234 (s, 1 H), 8.743–
8.738 (d, 1 H), 8.726–8.462 (m, 1 H), 8.101–8.076 (m, 1 H), 7.903–
7.882 (m, 1 H), 7.505–7.424 (m, 4 H), 7.357–7.326 (m, 1 H), 7.075–
7.055 (m, 1 H), 6.356 (s, 2 H), 6.253 (s, 2 H), 3.457 (s, 2 H), 3.402–
3.372 (t, 2 H), 3.201 (s, 2 H), 3.126–3.110 (m, 4 H), 2.562–2.532 (t,
2 H), 1.805 (s, 6 H), 1.278–1.242 (t, 6 H) ppm. 13C NMR
(100 MHz): δ = 170.40, 168.69, 153.67, 148.39, 147.36, 138.84,
135.80. 134.33, 132.38, 131.13, 128.29, 127.93, 127.84, 127.03,
123.80, 122.75, 121.37, 121.28, 117.90, 116.20, 105.82, 96.42, 65.14,
53.19, 48.23, 40.03, 38.18, 16.41, 14.57 ppm. ESI-MS: 641.1
[M + 1]+.
Cell Incubation and Imaging: The SCABER cells were provided by
Cells Bank of the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China).
Cells were grown in H-DMEM (high glucose) supplemented with
10% FBS in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air at 37 °C. Cells
(5ϫ108/L) were plated on 18 mm glass coverslips and allowed to
adhere for 24 h. Uptake experiments of Zn2+ were performed in
the same medium supplemented with 20 μm Zn(NO3)2 for 0.5 h.
Before the experiments, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) and incubated with 10 μm L1 at 37 °C for 3 h. Cell
imaging was carried out after washing the cells with PBS.
Assessment of Biocompatibility: The biocompatibility was deter-
mined in L929 mouse fibroblast cell lines. The cell viability was
evaluated by using the modified MTT assay. The cells were plated
at a density of 1ϫ105 in 96-well plates 24 h prior to exposure to
the materials. Different concentrations of L1 with saturated sur-
faces [by interaction with DMEM/F12 (1:1) for 24 h before use]
were added to the wells, and the cells were incubated for 24, 48,
and 72 h. After treatment, 10 μL of MTT (5 mg mL–1 in PBS) was
added into each well. After 4 h of incubation, culture supernatants
were aspirated, and purple insoluble MTT product was redissolved
in dimethyl sulfoxide (150 μL) over 10 min. The concentration of
the reduced MTT in each well was determined spectrophotometri-
cally by subtraction of the absorbance reading at 630 nm from that
measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader. All MTT experi-
ments were performed five times, and the maximum and minimum
were discounted. The results were expressed as the mean Ϯ stan-
dard deviation. Cell viabilities were presented as the percentage of
[9] Y. Liu, N. Zhang, Y. Chen, L. H. Wang, Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
315.
[10] a) H. A. Benesi, J. H. Hildebrand, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71,
2703; b) M. Barra, C. Bohne, J. C. Scaiano, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1990, 112, 8075.
[11] a) K. Hiratani, T. J. Hirose, K. Kasuga, K. Saito, J. Org. Chem.
1992, 57, 7083; b) T. Yang, C. Tu, J. Y. Zhang, L. P. Lin, X. M.
Zhang, Q. Liu, J. Ding, Q. Xu, Z. J. Guo, Dalton Trans. 2003,
3419.
[12] P. J. Jiang, L. Z. Chen, J. Lin, Q. Liu, J. Ding, X. Gao, Z. J.
Guo, Chem. Commun. 2002, 1424.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 327–332
© 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjic.org
331