776
R. L. E. Furlan et al. / Tetrahedron 58 (2002) 771±778
tuned by mixing only the right relative amounts of those
building blocks which feature in the species that bind to
the template.
distilled from CaH under Ar5g). N-methylquinuclidinium
2
2
1
iodide was prepared according to a literature procedure.
Column chromatography was carried out using silica gel 60
F 5Merck).
Alternatively, templates supported on polymer beads can
become a very useful tool.
4
e,19,20
Since the template is
attached to a solid support, the untemplated species will
eventually become washed from the solid support by
4.2.1. 3-Carboxybenzaldehyde dimethoxyacetal ,4). 3-
Carboxybenzaldehyde 5ꢀ.00 g, 0.033 mol) and ammonium
chloride 510 g, 0.20 mol) were re¯uxed in dry methanol
5110 ml) during 72 h under an atmosphere of argon. The
reaction mixture was ®ltered while warm and the solvent
removed under reduced pressure to give a white solid. The
product was puri®ed by recrystallization from hexane to
®
ltration leaving only `strong' binders appended to the
bead. The species attached to the solid phase may be washed
off under different solvent conditions that disrupt the
template±receptor interaction and subsequently identi®ed.
The development of selection techniques using guests
appended to polymer beads is pivotal to the management
and success of highly diverse DCLs.
1
afford compound 4 as a white solid 56.1g, 93%). H NMR
5400 MHz, CDCl ) d8.22 51H, s, Ar-H), 8.08 51H, d,
3
J7.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.715 H1 , d,
1
CH), 3.3ꢀ 56H, s, OMe); C NMR 562.ꢀ MHz, CDCl )
J7.8 Hz, Ar-H), 7.49,
5
1H, t, J7.8 Hz, Ar-H, J7.8 Hz, Ar-H), ꢀ.47 51H, s,
3
What is clear is that dynamic combinatorial chemistry is a
highly powerful technique, which by using reversible
chemistry can generate and screen highly diverse libraries
of candidate molecules for the identi®cation of host and
guest molecules with potential as catalysts or drugs.
Thermodynamic control invites the template to dictate its
preferred receptor thus amplifying the concentration of the
receptor. This reversal of thinking, away from design to
choreographed molecular ampli®cation, may unlock the
doors towards the discovery of unexpected novel receptors.
3
d171.94 5CvO), 138.73, 132.08, 130.28, 129.ꢀ0, 128.49
5Ar), 102.33 5CH), ꢀ2.67 5OMe).
4.2.2. ,S) N-,3-Dimethoxymethyl-benzoyl)-proline methyl
ester ,5). l-Proline methyl ester hydrochloride 50.ꢀ9 g,
3.ꢀ6 mmol) and 3-carboxybenzaldehyde dimethoxyacetal
50.70 g, 3.ꢀ7 mmol) were dissolved in dry CH Cl 520 ml)
2
2
containing dry Et N 51.0 ml, 7.17 mmol) under Ar5g) and
3
the solution was cooled to 08C on an ice bath. To this solu-
tion were added EDC 50.68 g, 3.ꢀ7 mmol) and DMAP
52ꢀ mg, 0.20 mmol) and the solution stirred at 08C for 1h
4. Experimental
before being allowed to warm to room temperature and
stirred overnight. CH Cl 5120 ml) was added and the solu-
2
2
4
.1. General
tion washed with H O 53£100 ml). The organic phase was
2
dried 5MgSO ) and the solvent removed under reduced pres-
4
HPLC analysis was performed on a Hewlett-Packard 10ꢀ0
instrument using reversed phase conditions of H O/MeCN
sure to give a yellow oil. Column chromatography 5SiO2)
[EtOAc/Hex, 8:2] yielded the titled compound 5 as a colour-
2
1
gradients with a 1ꢀ cm£4.6 mm i.d. 3 mm particle size,
less oil 50.76 g, 69%). H NMR 5400 MHz, CDCl ) d7.6ꢀ
3
1
Supelco ABZ plus C16 alkylamide column. Data were
51H, s, Ar-H), 7.ꢀ3±7.33 53H, band, Ar-H), ꢀ.39 51H, s,
CH5OMe) ), 4.67±4.63 51H, m, a-H), 3.76 53H, s, OMe),
analysed using HP ChemStation. All NMR spectroscopy
was performed on Bruker DRX 400 or DPX ꢀ00 instruments
and chemical shifts are quoted in parts per million with
respect to TMS. Electrospray mass spectra were recorded
on a Micromass Quattro-LC triple quadrupole apparatus
2
3.66±3.ꢀ0 52H, band, Pro-CH ), 3.3156H, s, CH5O Me) ),
2
2
2.3ꢀ±2.24 51H, m, Pro-CH CH ), 2.03±1.99 52H, band, Pro-
a
b
1
CH ), 1.91±1.82 51H, m, Pro-CH H ); C NMR 5100 MHz,
3
2
a
b
CDCl ) d174.1, 170.9 5CvO), 139.7, 137.ꢀ 5Arquat),
3
®
tted with a z-spray source. The electrospray source was
heated to 1008C and the sampling cone voltage 5V ) was
129.9, 129.6, 128.8, 127.1 5Ar-H), 104.0 5CH5OMe) ),
2
c
61.7 5a-H), 60.ꢀ 5COOMe), ꢀ4.1, ꢀ3.6 5CH5OMe) ), ꢀ1.3,
2
1
3
source without work-up with an LC pump 5Shimadzu LC-
0 V. Samples were introduced into the mass spectrometer
30.8, 26.8 5CH ); ESI-MS 51) m/z308 [M1H] , 276
2
1
[M2OMe] .
2
1
9
A) at a rate of 4 ml min of MeCN/H O 51:1). Calibration
2
was performed using protonated horse myoglobin. Scanning
was performed from m/z 200 to 2200 in 6 s and several scans
were summed to obtain the ®nal spectrum, which was
processed using MassLynx V3.0 software. High-resolution
mass spectra were recorded on a Micromass Q-tof
instrument, incorporating time-of-¯ight analysis with
electrospray ionization through a standard z-spray source.
Several scans were summed to obtain the ®nal spectrum
which was processed using MassLynx V3.0 software.
Calibration was performed using erythromycin as the
standard.
4.2.3. ,S) N-,3-Dimethoxymethyl-benzoyl)-proline carb-
oxylic acid hydrazide ,3). Proline ester 5 50.74 g,
2.41mmol) was treated with hydrazine monohydrate
51.2 ml, 24.7 mmol) in methanol 52ꢀ ml). The reaction
was left overnight before removal of the solvent under
vacuum to give a yellow oil which was puri®ed by ¯ash
chromatography 5SiO ) [CH Cl /MeOH, 90:10] to afford
2
2
2
1
the monomer 3 50.ꢀ7 g, 77%). H NMR 5400 MHz,
CDCl ) d8.315 H1 , s, N HNH ), 7.62 51H, s, Ar-H),
3
2
7.ꢀ3±7.4H 52H, band, Ar-H), 7.40 51H, m, Ar-H), ꢀ.39
51H, s, CH5OMe) ), 4.67±4.66 51H, m, a-H), 3.94 52H,
2
bs, NHNH ), 3.ꢀ9±3.ꢀ6 51H, band, Pro-CH CH ), 3.47±
b
2
a
4
.2. Materials
3.4ꢀ 51H, band, Pro-CH CH ), 3.3156H, s, CH5O Me) ),
a b 2
2
.37 51H, m, Pro-CH CH ), 2.11±2.04 52H, band, Pro-
a b
1
3
All chemicals were purchased from Aldrich, Lancaster or
Fluka and were used without further puri®cation. All
solvents were distilled prior to use and dry solvents freshly
CH
2
), 1.82 51H, m, Pro-CH
) d172.0, 170.7 5CvO), 138.ꢀ, 13ꢀ.9 5Arquat),
128.7, 128.3, 127.3, 12ꢀ.6 5Ar-H), 102.4 5CH5OMe) ),
H ); C NMR 5100 MHz,
a b
CDCl
3
2