C. Bucher, J. L. Sessler et al.
sulting solid was washed with 2ꢃ60 mL aqueous solution of H2SO4
(0.1m) to remove the supporting electrolyte, filtered, and finally rinsed
with approximately 25 mL of distilled water. The dark insoluble solid was
recovered and dissolved in CH2Cl2. The solution was then dried over an-
hydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was evaporated off to afford a
dark solid. Chromatography over silica gel by using CH2Cl2 +CH3OH
(1–5%) as the eluent allowed for the isolation of crude fractions contain-
ing [3H8]2+ and [2H7]2+, respectively. The crude fractions were further
purified by using silica-gel column chromatography that used CHCl3 +
CH3OH (1%) as the eluent for [5H8]2+ and CHCl3 +CH3OH (4%) as
and cyclo[7]pyrrole, as products from the electrolysis of a
simple pyrrole derivative. This approach, relying on the use
of a monomeric heterocyclic building block 3,4-diethylpyr-
role, still needs to be developed further if preparatively
useful quantities of the cyclic products are to be obtained.
Our current efforts are aimed at effecting this optimization
and to generalizing the present electrochemical-based strat-
egy such that viable quantities of new and extant expanded
porphyrin-type macrocycles can be obtained from cheap and
readily available starting materials.
the eluent for [2H7]2+
.
Electrochemical oxidation of 3,3’,4,4’-tetraethyl-2,2’-bipyrrole: A similar
approach was used for experiments involving the oxidation of bipyrrole,
except that the potential was not scanned. Rather, the potential was
maintained initially at À0.1 V and then slowly increased up to 0.025–
0.05 V.[35] A typical experiment involved approximately 20–25 mg of 2 in
approximately 60 mL of the solvent mixture (CH2Cl2 +supporting elec-
trolyte (0.15m, or 0.11m in the case of TPABF4)). The concentration of 2
was thus approximately 1.5 mm. After passing the required charge (2.4–
2.5 eÀ per molecule), the reaction was worked up by using a procedure
similar to the one employed in the case of the electrooxidation reactions
involving 5 (see above). The supporting electrolyte was removed by
washing with a dilute (ꢀ0.1m) aqueous solution of the corresponding
acid, except for the TBABr and TBAF, in which an aqueous solution of
H2SO4 (ꢀ0.05m) was used. In all other cases, care was taken to avoid
any contact with sulfate anions (e.g., drying was achieved by adding large
amounts of pentane followed by azeotropic distillation of water).
The yields of [2H7]2+ and [3H8]2+, especially in the case of electrooxida-
tions involving 5 in which small amounts of product are recovered
(ꢀ1 mg, but in some cases <0.3 mg), were calculated by using data from
UV/Vis spectroscopy (i.e., extinction coefficients) rather than weighing.
Thus, after isolation, samples of [2H7]2+ or [3H8]2+ were dissolved in
CH2Cl2 to produce solutions that were roughly 10À4 m in expanded por-
phyrin (as calculated from weighing when the quantity of material per-
mitted this) and the UV/Vis spectrum was recorded. The absorbance
values at 425 ([2H7]2+) and 428 nm ([3H8]2+) were measured and the
amount of substance in the solution was calculated by using the reported
data for the molar absorptivity[6,7] of [2H7]2+ and [3H8]2+. For the elec-
trolyses involving TBAHSO4, the yield was found to be reproducible
within 3% (average of three electrolyses) and only one electrolysis was
performed by using the other anions.
Experimental Section
General methods and materials: Pyrroles 4[50] and 5[61] were synthesized
according to procedures reported in the literature. The solvents used for
chromatography (chloroform (HPLC grade, Carlo Erba) and methanol
(SDS, anhydrous)) were used as received. The solvents used for electro-
chemical and spectroelectrochemical analyses (dichloromethane (SDS,
anhydrous), dichloroethane (98%), acetonitrile (Rathburn, HPLC
grade), and nitromethane (Acros Organics, 99+ %)) were used as re-
ceived. Tetrabutylammonium fluoride trihydrate (TBAF, Fluka, 98%),
tetrabutylammonium chloride (TBACl, Fluka, 99%), tetrabutylammoni-
um bromide (TBABr, Fluka, >98%), tetrabutylammonium nitrate
(TBANO3, Fluka, 97%), tetrabutylammonium hydrogensulfate
(TBAHSO4, Fluka, 99%), and tetraethylammonium perchlorate
(TEAClO4, Fluka, 97%) were used as received.
Tetrapropylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TPABF4) was prepared by
neutralizing tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (TPAOH) with an aqueous
solution of HBF4 (49.5–50.5%, Aldrich). The white precipitate obtained
in this way was collected by filtration, washed three times with small
amounts of water, and dried. The white solid that remained was dissolved
in a minimum amount of chloroform and the resulting solution was then
passed through a filter and evaporated to dryness. The resulting white
powder was dried for two days by using a vacuum pump at room temper-
ature and it was used without further purification.
All electrochemical data discussed in this report were obtained by using
platinum working electrodes. These had either a large area (55 cm2) in
the case of the electrolyses, or consisted of a small disk (CH-instrument,
2 mm diameter) for the collection of cyclic voltammetry data. All elec-
trolyses were carried out on a PAR 273 potentiostat, whereas cyclic vol-
tammetry data were obtained by using a CHI model 620 electrochemical
Spectroscopic data for [2H7]2+
:
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz,): d=À2.18
(brs; NH), 1.80 (t, J=7.28 Hz, 42H; CH2CH3), 4.25 ppm (brs, 28H;
CH2CH3); MS (ESI): m/z: 882.5 [MH2Cl]+; UV/Vis (CH2Cl2): lmax
(loge)=426 nm (4.63 molÀ1 dm3 cmÀ1). These data are in accord with the
published values.[7]
workstation. Spectroelectrochemical data were recorded by using
a
Spectroscopic data for [3H8]2+
:
1H NMR (CDCl3, 250 MHz, 293 K): d=
PAR 173 potentiostat-galvanostat and a Zeiss MCS 500 UV/NIR spec-
trometer.
3
À
À
1.59 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 48H; CH2CH3, ), 4.10 ppm (brs, 32H; CH2CH3);
MS (DCl/NH3): 969 [M+1]+; MS (ESI): m/z: 1065.7 [M+H2SO4]+; UV/
Vis (CH2Cl2): lmax (loge)=428 nm (4.76 molÀ1 dm3 cmÀ1). These data are
in accord with the published values.[6]
Typical experimental details for the electrochemical oxidation of 3,4-di-
ethylpyrrole: In a magnetically stirred three-compartment electrolysis
cell, 30–35 mL (ꢀ27–32 mg) of 5 were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (ꢀ60 mL)+
TBAHSO4 (0.2m; ꢀ4.5 mm of 5). The solution was purged with argon
for approximately 20 min prior to pyrrole addition (argon was bubbled
continuously until the end of the electrolysis). A large (ꢀ55 cm2) plati-
num mesh was used as the working electrode in the anodic compartment
with a carbon foam as counterelectrode in the cathodic compartment. A
double-junction Ag/AgNO3 (10À2 m) in CH3CN+tetrabutylammonium
perchlorate (0.1m) reference electrode was used in all experiments (all
potentials are referred to it). This reference electrode was placed in the
anodic compartment as close as possible to the working electrode to min-
imize the ohmic drop. After the addition of 5, the potential of the work-
ing electrode was scanned (50 mVsÀ) from 0.4 to 0.75 V, with a waiting
time of 3–12 s at the upper potential limit. The potential limits and wait-
ing times were gradually increased during the electrolysis (the upper
value was limited to 0.95 V) as 5 is consumed and the current drops.
After passing the required charge, the contents of both the anodic and
middle compartments (some mixing between these compartments occurs
during electrolysis) were collected and the solvent evaporated. The re-
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Agence National de la Recherche for financial
support (ANR-09-JCJC-0083-01). We also thank the CNRS for providing
a “Poste Rouge” for M.B. The work in Austin was supported by the NSF
(grant CHE-074971 to J.L.S.) and the Robert A. Welch Foundation (F-
1018).
´
[1] L. R. Eller, M. Ste˛pien, C. J. Fowler, J. T. Lee, J. L. Sessler, B. A.
[2] J. L. Sessler, S. Camiolo, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 17–55.
6818
ꢂ 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6810 – 6819