Insect Antifeedant Flavonoids
J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 48, No. 5, 2000 1889
was calculated as the dose corresponding to midpoint between
complete inhibition and no effect by the computer program.
TLC Bioassay. The TLC plates were cut into 4 × 10 cm
pieces. The samples containing carrier solvent were applied
to the plate as a band, and the plate was developed in the
appropriate solvent system for good separation. Distilled water
was added to the artificial diet to make a paste, which was
then applied to the surface of the developed TLC plate. This
TLC plate was then placed in a plastic cup with 50 larvae
) 9.0 Hz, Ar-H), 6.69 (1H, s, H -3), 4.18 (3H, s, -OCH
3
),
), 4.03 (6H, s, -OCH
); EIMS m/z (relative intensity) 372
, 100%).
4.10 (3H, s, -OCH
3
), 4.06 (3H, s, -OCH
3
3
× 2), 3.97 (3H, s, -OCH
3
+
(M , 31.6%), 357 (M-CH
3
Qu a n tita tive An a lysis of F la von oid s in th e P la n ts. For
measurement of the amount in the plants, the flavonoids were
analyzed by HPLC. The analysis was carried out using a
Shimadzu LC-9A system. The column used was an Inertsil
ODS,. 4.6 mm i.d. × 250 mm (GL Sciences Inc., J apan). One
of the flavonoids, quercetin, was used as the internal standard
for the quantitative analysis by HPLC. We investigated
methylated flavonoids for six extracts from Gnaphalium spp.
in J apan at 285 nm by a UV detector.
(fourth instar) for 1 d at 26.5 °C. The uneaten area was
compared with the Rf values of the compounds detected on
the reference TLC plate developed under the same conditions.
Moreover, residual silica gel was found on the plate after the
TLC plate assay was removed and extracted with ethyl acetate.
The extract of residual silica gel after the TLC plate assay
was developed in the same solvent system, detected with UV
light (254 nm) and 50% sulfuric acid heated to 150 °C to
confirm the compounds with antifeedant properties contained
in the silica gel residue (Escoubas et al., 1992).
Extr a ction a n d Isola tion . Plant material of cudweed (G.
affine) was collected at the flowering stage from March to J uly
in Nara and Kyoto Prefecture, J apan. The fresh whole body
of the cudweed (3.7 kg) was extracted with hexane. The
concentrated extract had any paraffins removed with metha-
nol. The yellow oil (11.9 g) was separated by silica gel (Fuji
Silysia Chemical, BW-127ZH) column chromatography with
SYNTHESIS OF DERIVATIVES
Selective Dem eth yla tion of Meth yl Eth er F la von es. A
solution of a methylated flavone in acetonitrile was mixed with
a solution of anhydrous aluminum bromide in acetonitrile
under reflux conditions in a nitrogen atmosphere. Water was
added to the mixture 10 min later. The mixture was then
extracted with ethyl acetate and dried over anhydrous sodium
sulfate. The solvent was removed by a rotary evaporator under
reduced pressure. The resulting demethyl derivative was
separated (Horie et al., 1993, 1995).
F la von oid Meth yl Eth er s. The appropriate molarity of
methyliodide corresponds to the number of phenols in the
chemical structure of the parent compound used for the
reactions with acetone containing potassium carbonate. The
methylation was performed through the night at room tem-
perature, and the liquid turned brown with formation of iodine.
After completion of the reaction, water was added, and the
solution was extracted with ethyl acetate and dried over
anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed by a
rotary evaporator under reduced pressure and purified in an
ordinary manner. These derivatives were characterized by
spectral analyses.
5
:1 hexane/ethyl acetate. The fraction including the antifeed-
ants was rechromatographed on the silica gel (Fuji Silysia
Chemical, BW-300) with the same solvent system. The final
purification of the antifeedants was performed by gel filtration
chromatography (Pharmacia, Shepadex LH-20) with methanol.
Three antifeedant flavonoids, 5-hydroxy-3,6,7,8,4′-penta-
methoxyflavone (1), 5-hydroxy-3,6,7,8-tetramethoxyflavone (2),
and 5,6-dihydroxy-3,7-dimethoxyflavone (3) were isolated from
this extract (Imre et al., 1984; Bohlmann et al., 1979, 1980).
After extraction with hexane, the plant residue was extracted
with ether and treated in the same manner. Thus we separated
out a constituent, 4,4′,6′-trihydroxy-2′-methoxychalcone (4)
5
-Dem eth ylta n ger etin (6): white powder (hexane); mp 175
(Bohlmann et al., 1979). For evaluation of the structure-
1
°
9
C; H NMR (CDCl
.0 Hz, Ar-H), 7.04 (2H, d, J ) 9.0 Hz, Ar-H), 6.60 (1H, s,
Ar-H), 4.11 (3H, s, OCH ), 3.97 (3H, s, OCH ), 3.95 (3H, s,
OCH ), 3.90 (3H, s, OCH ); EIMS m/z (relative intensity) 358
M , 56.8%), 343 (M-CH , 100%).
′,4′-Dih yd r oxy-4,6′-d im eth oxych a lcon e (7): pale orange
needles (CHCl ); mp 194-195 °C; UV (MeOH) λmax 208, 366
nm; H NMR (hexane) δ 14.43 (1H, s, Ar-OH), 7.79 (2H, s,
CHdCH-), 7.55 (2H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, Ar-H), 6.92 (2H, d, J )
.0 Hz, Ar-H), 6.10 (1H, d, J ) 2.5 Hz, Ar-H), 5.96 (1H, d, J
2.5 Hz, Ar-H), 5.23 (1H, s, Ar-OH), 3.91 (3H, s, OCH ),
3
) δ 12.57 (1H, s, Ar-OH), 7.90 (2H, d, J )
activity relationship, one of the methylated flavonoids, tan-
geretin (5), was isolated from the hexane extract of Citrus
auranetium. The peel of this citrus contains the known
3
3
3
3
5
1
-hydroxy-3,6,7,8,4′-pentamethoxyflavone (1) (Sarin et al.,
960). However, we did not detect this compound in the hexane
+
(
3
2
extract of C. auranetium. These natural compounds were
characterized by spectral analyses.
3
1
5
-H yd r oxy-3,6,7,8,4′-p en t a m et h oxyfla von e (1): yellow
-
8
)
3
1
powder (hexane); mp 122-123 °C; UV (MeOH) λmax 275, 325
1
nm; H NMR (CDCl
3
) δ 12.20 (1H, s, Ar-OH), 8.09 (2H, d, J
3
+
)
9.0 Hz, Ar-H), 6.97 (2H, d, J ) 9.0, Ar-H), 4.03 (3H, s,
.82 (3H, s, OCH
00%), 285 (M-CH
2
3
); EIMS m/z (relative intensity) 300 (M ,
, 15.6%).
OCH
3
), 3.88 (6H, s, OCH
3
× 2), 3.83 (3H, s, OCH
3
), 3.80 (3H,
3
+
s, OCH
M-CH
-Hyd r oxy-3,6,7,8-tetr a m eth oxyfla von e (2): yellow pow-
der (hexane); mp 98-100 °C; UV (MeOH) λmax 278, 352 nm;
H NMR (CDCl
H), 7.54 (2H, m, Ar-H), 4.10 (3H, s, OCH
.91 (3H, s, OCH ), 3.97 (3H, s, OCH ); EIMS m/z (relative
intensity) 358 (M , 66.9%), 343 (M-CH , 100%).
,6-Dih yd r oxy-3,7-d im eth oxyfla von e (3): yellow crystals
3
); EIMS m/z (relative intensity) 388 (M , 66.6%), 373
′-Hydr oxy-4,4′,6′-tr im eth oxych alcon e (8): yellow needles
(
3
, 100%).
1
(
(
(
hexane); mp 113 °C; UV (MeOH) λmax 208, 362 nm; H NMR
CDCl ) δ 13.93 (1H, s, Ar-OH), 7.79 (2H, s, -CHdCH-), 7.55
2H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, Ar-H), 6.92 (2H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, Ar-H),
.10 (1H, d, J ) 2.5 Hz, Ar-H), 5.96 (1H, d, J ) 2.5 Hz, Ar-
H), 3.91 (3H, s, OCH ), 3.85 (3H, s, OCH ), 3.82 (3H, s, OCH );
EIMS m/z (relative intensity) 314 (M , 100%), 299 (M-CH
2.2%).
,2′,4′,6′-Tetr a m eth oxych a lcon e (9): yellow needles (hex-
5
3
1
3
) δ 12.62 (1H, s, Ar-OH), 8.13 (3H, m, Ar-
6
3
), 3.92 (3H, s, OCH ),
3
3
3
3
3
3
+
3
+
3
,
3
1
5
4
1
(
hexane); mp 178 °C; UV (MeOH) λmax 274, 346 nm; H NMR
CDCl ) δ 12.37 (1H, s, Ar-OH), 8.11 (3H, m, Ar-H), 7.54 (2H,
1
ane); mp 119-121 °C; UV (MeOH) λmax 245, 366 nm; H NMR
(
3
(
1
6
CDCl
3
) δ 7.46 (2H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, Ar-H), 7.32 (1H, d, J )
3.0 Hz, CHdC(R)H), 6.86 (1H, d, J ) 13.0 Hz, CHdC(â)H),
.78 (2H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, Ar-H), 6.14 (2H, s, Ar-H), 3.85 (3H,
), 3.82 (3H, s, OCH ), 3.75 (6H, s, OCH
m, Ar-H), 6.44 (1H, s, Ar-H), 6.34 (1H, s, Ar-OH), 4.00 (3H,
s, OCH ), 3.88 (3H, s, OCH ); EIMS m/z (relative intensity)
14 (M , 66.9%), 299 (M-CH , 100%).
,4′,6′-Tr ih yd r oxy-2′-m eth oxych a lcon e (4): yellow pow-
3
3
+
3
3
s, OCH
3
3
3
× 2); EIMS
, 100%).
4
+
m/z (relative intensity) 328 (M , 66.9%), 313 (M-CH
3
1
der (CHCl
NMR (CDCl
2), 7.91 (1H, d, J ) 13.0 Hz, CHdC(â)H), 7.91 (1H, d, J )
3.0 Hz, CHdC(R)H), 7.58 (2H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, Ar-H), 6.85
2H, d, J ) 8.0 Ar-H), 6.00 (1H, s, Ar-H), 5.91 (1H, s, Ar-
H), 3.87 (3H, s, OCH
2.1%), 271 (M-CH
Ta n ger etin (5): white needles (hexane); mp 152 °C; 1
NMR(CDCl ) δ 7.96 (2H, d, J ) 9.0 Hz, Ar-H), 7.10 (2H, d, J
3
); mp 248 °C; UV (MeOH) λmax 245, 366 nm; H
3
) δ 13.93 (1H, s, Ar-OH), 10.30 (2H, s, Ar-OH
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
×
1
In sect An tifeed a n t Activities of Na tu r a l F la -
von oid s a n d Th eir Der iva tives. During the choice
leaf-disk bioassay for evaluation of insect antifeedants,
we initially recognized the insect antifeedant activities
of the hexane and ether extracts from G. affine. Active
(
+
3
); EIMS m/z (relative intensity) 286 (M ,
8
3
, 41.5%), 167 (100%).
H
3