Communications
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201102601
Ultrafast Dynamics
Photoinduced Symmetry-Breaking Charge Separation: The Direction
of the Charge Transfer**
Vesna Markovic, Diego Villamaina, Igor Barabanov, Latevi Max Lawson Daku, and
Eric Vauthey*
Photoinduced symmetry breaking (SB) charge separation
(CS) occurs when an excited chromophore is surrounded by
several identical electron donors or acceptors, but it can also
happen between two identical molecular units when one of
them is in an excited state. Such a process is observed in the
reaction center of photosynthetic purple bacteria, where a
bacteriochlorophyll dimer is surrounded by two almost
identical branches of protein-bound cofactors.[1] Despite this
symmetry, electron transfer takes place almost exclusively
along one branch.[2] It has been shown that because the
constituents of the dimer have slightly different geometries
and local environments, CS along one branch is energetically
more favorable and thus substantially faster than along the
other.[3] Photoinduced SB-CS has also been observed in a few
multichromophoric systems containing two or more identical
molecular units, such as anthracene,[4] stilbene,[5] naphthale-
nediimides,[6] and perylenediimides.[7] Occurrence of SB-CS in
these systems has been deduced from the transient absorption
spectra recorded upon photoexcitation of one of the molec-
ular units, M. However, the MCꢀ and MC+ ions could not be
unambiguously recognized and distinguished, mainly because
their absorption bands overlap or have too dissimilar
intensities. Furthermore, the direction of the charge flow,
that is, whether the electron is transferred from or toward the
excited unit, could not be determined. The CS direction was
supposed to be random and solely determined by solvent
fluctuations, except in one case,[7a] where structural relaxation
of the excited unit was proposed to be at the origin of SB.
Herein, we present investigations into the photoinduced
SB-CS in 1,3-bis(3-perylenyl)propane (Pe-Pr-Pe), a bichro-
mophoric dyad with which we could unambiguously deter-
mine the CS direction, that is, whether photoinduced electron
or hole transfer is taking place. Perylene (Pe) was selected
because this molecule has already been shown to undergo
intermolecular photoinduced SB-CS,[8] and also becuase both
+
PeC and PeCꢀ ions can be easily distinguished by their intense
!
D5 D0 absorption band centered around 540 and 585 nm,
respectively.[9] A propyl bridge was chosen to avoid too strong
an electronic coupling between the two perylene units and to
ensure that they are not parallel to each other. This lack of
planarity was confirmed by conformational analysis, which
also predicted the coexistence of compact and open con-
formers of Pe-Pr-Pe in acetonitrile at 300 K (Figure 1 and
Supporting Information).
Figure 1. Structures of coexisting compact (a) and open (b) conform-
ers of Pe-Pr-Pe in acetonitrile at 300 K. Structures were obtained from
conformational analysis based on well-tempered metadynamics (WT-
MTD) simulations on the isolated molecule and subsequent optimiza-
tion in acetonitrile using the dispersion-corrected DFT-D3 method.
!
The dipole moment associated with the local S1 S0
!
~
transition of perylene, m0, and those related to the D5 D0
~
~
band of the ionic forms, m and m , are all parallel to the
þ
ꢀ
perylene long axis.[10] Therefore, if the excited perylene unit
always acts as electron donor, ~m , but not ~m , is parallel to ~m0
þ
ꢀ
(Figure 2), and the polarization anisotropy of the cation band,
r+, is larger than that of the anion band, rꢀ. On the other hand,
the contrary is true if the excited perylene acts as a hole donor
only. Finally, r+ = rꢀ if CS is bidirectional.
[*] V. Markovic, D. Villamaina, Dr. L. M. Lawson Daku,
Prof. Dr. E. Vauthey
Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Geneva
30 Quai Ernest-Ansermet, 1211 Genꢀve 4 (Switzerland)
E-mail: eric.vauthey@unige.ch
The stationary absorption and emission spectra of Pe-Pr-
Pe in cyclohexane (C6H12) and MeCN are very similar to
those of perylene, except for a small red shift that can be
accounted for by the presence of the propyl bridge (Support-
ing Information, Figure S2). This resemblance points to a
weak electronic coupling between the perylene units and to a
localization of the excitation entirely on one perylene.
However, the fluorescence quantum yield is 0.45 in MeCN
and 0.91 in C6H12, suggesting the existence of an additional
non-radiative deactivation pathway in polar solvents, which is
most probably SB-CS. This is corroborated by time-resolved
Dr. I. Barabanov
Institute of Chemical Kinetics and Combustion, RAS
Institutskaya str. 3, 630090 Novosibirsk (Russia)
[**] This research has been supported by the Swiss National Science
Foundation (Project Nr. 200020-124393 and the NCCR-MUST) and
the University of Geneva. We acknowledge supercomputer time at
the Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) and the Centre
for Advanced Modelling Science (CADMOS).
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW
7596
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7596 –7598