P.J. Krusic et al. / Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 126 (2005) 1510–1516
1515
amounts prior to sealing the ampoule with a torch; the internal
volume after sealing was approximately 4.0 mL. The added gas
served not only as a chemical shift reference but also as a mass
reference. The starting number of micromoles of PFOA was
obtained from the weight and was compared with the
micromoles of the C2F6 mass standard (as obtained from the
19F NMR intensity) in order to define the starting point for the
kinetics. The integrated NMR intensity of the mass standard
was invariant and was used to normalize the NMR intensities of
the reaction components. Ampoules were obtained from New
Era Enterprises Inc. (Vineland, NJ) and were either kept in a
vacuum oven at 110–120 8C or were flame-dried on a vacuum
line (P < 1 mTorr) before use.
The 19F NMR spectra were obtained using a 400 MHz
Oxford magnet (19F at 376.312 MHz) with a Varian Unity Inova
console. The high-temperature 10 mm probe and variable
temperature controller had a nominal upper temperature rating
of 400 8C and were purchased from Nalorac Corporation (now
Varian Inc.). It was found that in situ kinetic studies lasting
more than a few hours were limited to sample temperatures of
307 8C or less in order to avoid exceeding the upper
temperature limit of the shim stack (110 8C). 19F NMR spectra
were acquired using a small flip-angle pulse (ꢄ 358) in order to
achieve relatively uniform power distribution over the
appropriate spectral region. 19F chemical shifts in the gas
phase were measured relative to C2F6 at ꢁ87.2 ppm on the
CFCI3 (F11) scale. Since 19F spin-rotation relaxation is very
efficient in the gas phase, 250 ms recycle delays were
appropriate and permitted rapid signal averaging (e.g., 180
scans in approximately 1 min). Temperatures were calibrated
using a thin thermocouple positioned in the center of a dummy
ampoule identical to those used for the actual kinetic runs
except for a small hole at the end of the 5 mm stem to permit
insertion of the thermocouple.
shorter than the heating intervals. After a fixed period of time in
the furnace, the ampoule was removed and quickly cooled to
room temperature by covering the ampoule with sand to quench
the pyrolysis. The ampoule was then placed in the NMR probe
at 243 8C, a temperature above the boiling point of PFOA but at
which decomposition was very slow, and the 19F NMR
spectrum acquired as described above.
Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry data were
acquired with an lon-ToF GmbH Model IV ion-reflector type
time-of-flight instrument (Muenster, Germany). Au+ primary
ions were used and a pulsed electron flood gun was used for
charge compensation. Spatially-resolved ToF-SIMS spectral
data was acquired in 256 pixel ꢂ 256 pixel arrays spanning
500 mm ꢂ 500 mm areas from the inside surfaces of ampoules.
Positively- and negatively-charged secondary ions were
collected in separate experiments. Analysis was carried out
on the inner surface of both reacted and unreacted ampoules.
Linear PFOA (97% purity) was obtained from Oakwood
Products Inc. and was dried in a desiccator and kept in a
nitrogen glove box. 1-H-Perfluoroheptane (1-H-pentadeca-
fluoroheptane) was purchased from Lancaster Synthesis Inc.
and hexafluoroethane (F116) was prepared in our laboratories.
Tetramethylsilane (TMS) and perfluorooctanamide were
purchased from Aldrich and used without further purification.
Perfluoro-1-heptene (>95% purity) was purchased from
SynQuest Laboratories Inc.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to A.J. Vega (University of Delaware) for
assistance with the numerical integration required to model the
surface site deactivation that leads to fitting of the bimodal
kinetics in Fig. 3. We gratefully acknowledge K.G. Lloyd for
the ToF-SIMS analytical characterization and R.L. Waterland
and B.E. Smart for useful discussions.
The gas-phase 19F NMR spectrum of PFOA at 243 8C
consisted of six CF2 fluorine resonances in the region from
ꢁ116.4 to ꢁ123.9 ppm and a resonance for the CF3 fluorines
(ꢁ81.2 ppm). 1-H-Perfluoroheptane [5] and perfluoro-1-hep-
tene [15] were recognized by resonances that were distinct from
those of PFOA (e.g., terminal –CF2H and perfluorovinyl
References
[1] E. Kissa, Fluorinated Surfactants and Repellants, second ed., Marcel
Dekker, New York, NY, 2001.
fluorines,
respectively).
Perfluorooctanamide
[2] M.M. Schultz, D.F. Barofsky, J.A. Field, Environ. Eng. Sci. 20 (2003)
487–501.
(CF3(CF2)6CONH2) was identified by its H and 19F NMR
spectra which were identical to those of a commercial sample
obtained under conditions similar to those used for the kinetic
studies. The CF3 resonances of the latter three compounds
overlapped that of PFOA. SiF4 was observed at ꢁ169.2 ppm.
Kinetic studies which were performed at temperatures
exceeding 307 8C were conducted by placing the ampoule for
specified time intervals in a furnace consisting of a cylindrical
copper body with a 12 mm bore and holes for thermocouple
placements surrounded by heater wire coils embedded in
ceramic insulation. The temperature controller was from
Electronic Control Systems Inc. (Poway, CA). Furnace
temperatures were checked with a digital thermometer and
agreed within 1 8C up to 400 8C with the temperature read by
the controller. Because of the small heat capacity of the
ampoules, thermal equilibrium was reached in a time much
1
[3] M. Pabon, J.M. Corpart, J. Fluorine Chem. 114 (2002) 149–156.
[4] D.A. Ellis, J.W. Martin, A.O. De Silva, S.A. Mabury, M.D. Hurley, M.P.
Sulbaek Andersen, T. Wallington, J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004)
3316–3321.
[5] P.J. Krusic, D.C. Roe, Anal. Chem. 76 (2004) 3800–3803.
[6] P.G. Blake, H.J. Pritchard, Chem. Soc. B (1967) 282–286.
[7] A. Ashworth, P.G. Harrison, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 89 (1993)
2409–2412.
[8] D.M. Jollie, P.G. Harrison, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 (1997) 1571–
1575.
[9] L.M. Reynard, D.J. Donaldson, J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002) 8651–8657.
[10] A.J. Belsky, P.G. Maiella, T.B. Brill, J. Phys. Chem. A 103 (1999) 4253–
4260.
[11] Y. Moroi, H. Yano, O. Shibata, T. Yonemitsu, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 74
(2001) 667–672.
[12] P.M. Kating, P.J. Krusic, D.C. Roe, B.E. Smart, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118
(1996) 10000–10001.
[13] P.J. Krusic, D.C. Roe, B.E. Smart, Israel J. Chem. 39 (1999) 117–123.