4634 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 14, 1997
Kingsbury and Smith
vigorously shaken until a deep blue color developed and all
solids had dissolved. The layers were then separated. The
aqueous layer was solvent extracted (2 × 20 mL), and the
combined organic extracts were washed with water (50 mL)
and then dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4).
The mixture was filtered after approximately 15 min, and
solvents were evaporated under reduced pressure.
Wor k u p 2. After quenching, two aliquots (≈0.5 mL) were
removed from the organic phase and were added to separate
sample tubes, each containing NH4+/NH3 (≈0.5 mL), and
diluted with hexane (2 mL). The mixtures were shaken until
all solid had dissolved and then allowed to settle, and the
organic phase was analyzed by GC.
2-Bu t yl-2,3,4,4a ,5,6,7,8-oct a h yd r o-4a -m et h yl-2-n a p h -
th a len ol (7). Method A (three times scale), Et2O (30 mL), 6
(465 µL, 3.0 mmol), workup 1, hexane, but dried over anhy-
drous sodium sulfate (Na2SO4). The 1H NMR of the crude
product indicated a small amount of 6 still remained, and this
material was chromatographed on basic alumina (activity II).
Elution with 15% Et2O/hexane gave 7 (0.526 g, 2.37 mmol,
79%) of a colorless oil, as an inseparable mixture of isomeric
allylic alcohols. Anal. Calcd for C15H26O: C, 81.02; H, 11.79%.
Found: C, 80.71; H, 11.48%. IR νmax (cm-1) (film) 3354 (OH),
1657 (CdC). 1H NMR δ (ppm) 5.22 (1H, broad s, H-1), 2.3-
1.1 (19H, m) 1.10 (2), 1.02 (1) (3H, s, H-9), 0.92 (3H, t, J ) 6.9
Hz, H-13). Workup by standing over anhydrous magnesium
sulfate or chromatography on silica gel or basic alumina
(activity I) resulted in dehydration of 7.
Rea ction of th e 1:2:w Cu I/Bu Li/Et 2O Mixtu r es w ith 6.
All reactions were run using method C, Et2O (w(ME)), 6 (155
µL, 1.0 mmol), and workup 2, and products were analyzed by
GC. The results, graphically presented in Figure 1:
(w)Et2O
products (mol %)
(ME)
7
8
0.00
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
3.00
5.00
98
93
67
44
37
3
2
7
33
56
63
97
98
96
2
4
Rea ction s of 1:2:w Cu I/Bu Li/Et2O Mixtu r es w ith 9-11.
All reactions were run using method C, Et2O (w(ME)), enone
(1.0 mmol). Reactions were worked up via workup 1, dried
over Na2SO4, and analyzed by 1H NMR. Product percentages
from mixtures were ascertained from diagnostic 1H NMR
resonances or from integrated area excesses. The results are
given in Table 3.
Stoich iom etr ic Stu d ies on Cu I/Bu Li Mixtu r es w ith 6.
All reactions were adjusted to 1.0 mmol scale and worked up
as for workup 2. The results are given in Tables 2 and 3.
cis-8a-Bu tyl-3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octah ydr o-4a-m eth yl-2(1H)-
n a p h th a len on e (8). Method B, 6 (155 µL, 1.0 mmol), workup
Bu Li. Method A, toluene, and 6 (155 µL, 1.0 mmol).
1:1 Cu I/Bu Li. Method D and 6 (155 µL, 1.0 mmol).
1
1, hexane. The H NMR of the crude product showed a small
amount of 7. The product was chromatographed on silica gel,
and elution with dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) gave 8 (0.179 g,
89%) as a colorless oil. Anal. Calcd for C15H26O: C, 81.02; H,
11.79%. Found: C, 80.78; H,12.07%. IR νmax (cm-1) (film) 1715
(CdO). 1H NMR (300 MHz) δ (ppm) 2.4-2.1 (4H, m), 1.6-1.1
1:2 Cu I/Bu Li. (a) Method C and 6 (155 µL, 1.0 mmol). (b)
Method C and 6 (310 µL, 2.0 mmol).
1:1:5 Cu I/Bu Li/Et2O. Method D, Et2O (523 µL, 5.0 mmol),
and 6 (155 µL, 1.0 mmol).
1:2:1 Cu I/Bu Li/Et2O. (a) Method C, Et2O (105 µL, 1.0
mmol), and 6 (155 µL, 1.0 mmol). (b) Method C, Et2O (105
µL, 1.0 mmol), and 6 (233 µL, 1.5 mmol).
1:2:5 Cu I/Bu Li/Et2O. (a) Method C, Et2O (523 µL, 5.0
mmol), and 6 (155 µL, 1.0 mmol). (b) Method C, Et2O (523
µL, 5.0 mmol), and 6 (233 µL, 1.5 mmol).
Rea ction of Cu I/Bu Li Mixtu r es w ith 12. All reactions
were carried out in toluene with 12 (0.258 g, 1.0 mmol) added
as a CH2Cl2 solution (2 mL). Addition of 12 caused a yellow/
orange precipitate to appear, which stopped stirring. Workup
1, CH2Cl2, was followed by analysis using 1H NMR. The
results are listed in Table 4.
1
(16H, m), 1.05 (3H, s, H-9), 0.89 (3H, t, J ) 6.9 Hz, H-13). H
NMR (300 MHz) (90 °C) (toluene-d8) δ (ppm) 2.17 (1H, d, J )
14.1 Hz, H-1), 2.09 (2H, d, J ) 14.2 Hz, H-3), 1.91 (1H, d, J )
14.1 Hz, H-1), 1.69 (1H, m, H-3), 1.4-0.9 (15H, m), 0.85 (3H,
t, J ) 6.9 Hz, H-13), 0.80 (3H, s, H-9). 13C NMR (75MHz) δ
(ppm) 213.0 (C-2), ≈47 (very broad) 42.8, 38.1, 35.6 (broad),
34.2, 33.9 (broad), 30.1 (broad), 24.9, 23.6, 22.7, 21.6, 21.2, 14.1.
13C NMR (75 MHz) (90 °C) (toluene-d8) δ (ppm) 208.6 (C-2),
47.0 (CH2), 42.9 (C), 38.1 (CH2), 36.2 (CH2), 36.0 (C), 34.7
(CH2), 34.5 (CH2), 30.8 (CH2), 25.5 (CH2), 24.1 (CH2), 22.8
(CH3), 22.1 (CH2), 21.7 (CH2), 14.1 (CH3).
1-Bu tyl-3,5,5-tr im eth yl-2-cycloh exen -1-ol. Method C, 10
(150 µL, 1.0 mmol), workup 1, hexane, dried over anhydrous
Bu Li. Method A gave 12 (0.131 g, 0.51 mmol) and cis-2-
butyl-2,3,4,4a,5,6,7,8-octahydro-5-(mesyloxy)-4a-methyl-2-naph-
thalenol (14) (0.116 g, 0.34 mmol) as an inseparable mixture
1
Na2SO4. The H NMR analysis gave 1-butyl-3,5,5-trimethyl-
1
2-cyclohexen-1-ol (95%), H NMR δ (ppm) 5.32 (1H, broad s,
H-2), and 3-butyl-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexanone (5%), from the
integrated areas. The crude material was chromatographed
on alumina, and elution with 25% Et2O/hexane gave the
alcohol (0.161 g, 82%) as a colorless oil. Anal. Calcd for
C13H24O: C, 79.53; H, 12.32%. Found: C, 79.23; H, 12.46%.
IR νmax (cm-1) (film) 3386 (OH) 1670 (CdC). 1H NMR δ (ppm)
5.32 (1H, broad s, H-2), 1.8-1.6 (5H, m), 1.5-1.2 (9H, m), 1.04
(3H, s), 0.97 (3H, s), 0.90 (3H, t, J ) 7.1 Hz). 13C NMR (50
MHz) δ (ppm) 135.2 (C-3), 126.0 (C-2), 71.4 (C-1), 47.6, 44.4,
44.0, 31.7, 29.9, 27.4, 25.7, 24.0, 23.2, 14.1.
1
of isomers, H NMR δ (ppm) 3.1-3.0 (3H, s, OMs), 0.90 (3H,
t, J ) 7.0 Hz, H-13).
1:1 Cu I/Bu Li. Method D gave 12 (0.095 g, 0.37 mmol) and
6-methyltricyclo[4.4.0.01,5]-9-decanone (13) (0.015 g, 0.09 mmol),
1H NMR δ (ppm) 2.64, 2.63, (2H, AB system, J AB ) 18.6 Hz,
H-1), 1.06 (3H, s, H-11), in agreement with an authentic
sample,17 and 14 (0.147 g, 0.46 mmol).
1:1:2 Cu I/Bu Li/Et 2O. Method D, Et2O (230 µL, 2.2 mmol).
Bu 2Cu Li/Et2O. Method B.
Rea ction s of Or ga n ocop p er Rea gen ts w ith 6. Products
from organometallic reactions with 6 were analyzed by GC
with n-dodecane (n-C12) (227 µL, 1.0 mmol) as the internal
standard (workup 2). The column was heated from 90 to 190
°C at a rate of 15 °C min-1. Retention times (tR) and response
factors (Rf) for 6-8 are given in the following table.
1:2 Cu I/Bu Li. Method C.
1:2:2 Cu I/Bu Li/Et2O. Method C, Et2O (230 µL, 2.2 mmol).
Rea ction s of 1:2:w Cu I/Bu Li/Et2O w ith 6 Con ta in in g
LiI. All reactions were run using method C, Et2O (w(ME)),
LiI (0.147 g, 1.0 ME), and 6 (155 µL, 1.0 mmol), and the
reactions were worked up via workup 2. The results are given
in Table 5.
compound
tR (min)
Rf
Ack n ow led gm en t. C.L.K. thanks the Research
Committee of the New Zealand Universities Grants
Committee for a postgraduate scholarship.
n-C12
2.0
3.7
4.2-5.4
6.1
-
6
7
8
1.30
0.98
0.92
J O970316Y