August 2010
1115
spraying with 10% aqueous H2SO4 solution, followed by heating.
analysis was run on Shimadzu LC-6AD (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Var-
Plant Material The leaves of P. ginseng were collected in Geumsan ian column (Polaris XRs5 C18, 250ϫ4.6 mm) and an ELSD-LT evaporative
province, which is well-known for P. ginseng cultivation in Korea, in August light scattering detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The separation was ef-
2008, and were taxonomically identified by one of the authors (Y. H. Kim). fected by gradient elution, using eluents (A) CH3CN : H2O : 5% acetic acid
Voucher specimens (CNU 08201) have been deposited at the College of (15 : 80 : 5) and (B) CH3CN : H2O (80 : 20) according to the following pro-
Pharmacy, Chungnam National University. The air-dried sample (1.0 kg) file: 0—10 min, 30% B (70% A); 10—25 min, 50% B; 25—40 min, 80% B;
was crushed finely and then steamed at 120 °C for 4 h under 0.15 MPa pres- 40—60 min, 100% B. The solvent flow rate was held constant at 1.0 ml/min
sure, without mixing with water, to give the steamed-leaf sample, which was at ambient temperature throughout the analysis.
used for extraction and isolation in this study.
Extraction and Isolation The steamed-leaf sample of P. ginseng was
Cytotoxic Assay Cell growth inhibition by different samples was ana-
lyzed using colorimetric MTT assay in HL-60 cell lilne. HL-60 cells were
extracted in MeOH (4.0 lϫ3, 50 °C) and the combined extracts were concen- obtained from the Korea Cell Ling Bank (KCLB, Seoul, Korea) and cultured
trated in vacuo to dryness. The MeOH residue (160 g) was suspended in in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO Inc.,
H2O (2.0 l), then partitioned with CH2Cl2 (2.0 lϫ3), and the water layer was Grand Island, NY, U.S.A.) and 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml strepto-
subjected to a Diaion HP-20 column eluted with a gradient of MeOH in H2O mycin (GIBCO Inc., Grand Island, NY, U.S.A.) at 37 °C in a humidified 5%
(25, 50, 75, 100% MeOH; v/v) to give eight fractions (fr. 1.1—fr. 1.8). Next, CO2. Briefly, HL-60 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of
fr. 1.6 (4.5 g) was chromatographed on a silica gel column using CHCl3– 3ϫ105 cells/well. The cells were then treated with the samples at concentra-
MeOH–H2O (10 : 3 : 0.4, v/v/v) to afford eleven subfractions (fr. 2.1—fr.
2.11). Fr. 2.1 (300 mg) was further chromatographed on a reversed-phase U.S.A.) was used as the positive control. After 3 d, the cells were treated
column with MeOH–H2O (4 : 1) to obtain ginsenoside Rh4 (6, 80 mg). Simi- with 50 ml MTT (2 mg/ml, Sigma Chemical Co., MO, U.S.A.). Plates were
tions ranging from 0.1 to 100 mM. Mitoxantrone (MX) (Sigma-Aldrich, MO,
larly, fr. 2.3 (350 mg) was subjected to a reversed-phase column with incubated at 37 °C for 4 h, the media was carefully aspirated. 150 ml Di-
MeOH–H2O (5 : 3) to afford ginsenoside Rh1 (4, 23 mg) and ginsenoside F1 methylsulfoxide (DMSO, Amresco, OH, U.S.A.) was then added to each
(5, 45 mg). Fr. 2.4 (330 mg) was repeatedly chromatographed on a reversed- well to dissolve the formazan crystals. The plates were read immediately at
phase column with MeOH–H2O (5 : 2) to furnish ginsenoside SL1 (1, 540 nm on a microplate reader (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech., NY,
13 mg), ginsenoside Rg6 (9, 15 mg), and ginsenoside F4 (10, 12 mg). Again, U.S.A.). All the experiments were performed at least three times in triplicate
fr. 2.7 (550 mg) was chromatographed on a reversed-phase column with and the mean absorbance values were calculated.
MeOH–H2O (5 : 2) to give ginsenoside SL2 (2, 15 mg), ginsenoside SL3 (3,
12 mg), (20S)-ginsenoside Rg2 (7, 14 mg), and (20R)-ginsenoside Rg2 (8,
20 mg).
Fr. 1.8 (10.0 g) was subjected to a silica gel column with CHCl3–MeOH–
Acknowledgements This study was supported by the Technology De-
velopment Program for Agriculture and Forestry (No. 108079-3), the Min-
istry for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; and the Priority Research Cen-
H2O (7 : 1 : 0.1) to furnish five subfractions (fr. 3.1—fr. 3.5). Then, fr. 3.1 ter Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
(130 mg) was repeatedly chromatographed on a reversed-phase column with funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2009-
MeOH–H2O (8 : 1) to give ginsenoside Rh3 (11, 18 mg) and ginsenoside Rk2 0093815), Republic of Korea. The authors would like to thank the Korean
(12, 20 mg). Finally, fr. 3.4 (350 mg) was chromatographed on a reversed- Basic Science Institute (KBSI) for taking NMR and MS experiments.
phase column with MeOH–H2O (6 : 1) to obtain (20S)-ginsenoside Rh2 (13,
25 mg) and (20R)-ginsenoside Rh2 (14, 15 mg).
References
Ginsenoside SL1 (1): White amorphous powder; [a]D20 ϩ12° (cϭ0.22,
MeOH); IR (KBr) nmax: 3448, 2922, 1637, 1262, 1054 cmϪ1; 1H-NMR (pyri-
dine-d5, 400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (pyridine-d5, 100 MHz): see Table 1; HR-
FT-ICR-MS m/z: 693.4141 [MϩNa]ϩ (Calcd for C36H62O11Na: 693.4190).
Ginsenoside SL2 (2): White amorphous powder; [a]D20 Ϫ9° (cϭ0.25,
MeOH); IR (KBr) nmax: 3436, 2931, 1634, 1260, 1068 cmϪ1; 1H-NMR (pyri-
dine-d5, 400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (pyridine-d5, 100 MHz): see Table 1; HR-
FT-ICR-MS m/z: 821.4596 [MϩNa]ϩ (Calcd for C42H70O14Na: 821.4663).
Ginsenoside SL3 (3): White amorphous powder; [a]D20 Ϫ11° (cϭ0.18,
1) Park J. D., Rhee D. K., Lee Y. H., Phytochem. Rev., 4, 159—175
(2005).
2) Shibata S., J. Korean Med. Sci., 16, 28—37 (2001).
3) Dou D. Q., Chen Y. J., Liang L. H., Pang F. G., Shimizu N., Takeda T.,
Chem. Pharm. Bull., 49, 442—446 (2001).
4) Yoshikawa M., Sugimoto S., Nakamura S., Matsuda H., Chem. Pharm.
Bull., 55, 571—576 (2007).
5) Wang H. W., Peng D. C., Xie J. T., Chin. Med., 4, 20—28 (2009).
6) Tung N. H., Song G. Y., Park Y. J., Kim Y. H., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 57,
1412—1414 (2009).
7) Tung N. H., Song G. Y., Kim J. A., Hyun J. H., Kang H. K., Kim Y. H.,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 20, 309—314 (2010).
8) Park I. H., Kim N. Y., Han S. B., Kim J. M., Kwon S. W., Kim H. J.,
Park M. K., Park J. H. Arch. Pharm. Res., 25, 428—432 (2002).
9) Ko S. R., Choi K. J., Suzuki K., Suzuki Y., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 51,
404—408 (2003).
10) Yang X. W., Li L. Y., Tian J. M., Zhang Z. W., Ye J. M., Gu W. F.,
Chin. Chem. Lett., 11, 909—912 (2000).
11) Ryu J. H., Park J. H., Eun J. H., Jung J. H., Sohn D. H.,
Phytochemistry, 44, 931—933 (1997).
MeOH); IR (KBr) nmax: 3427, 2942, 1637, 1256, 1072 cmϪ1 1H-NMR
;
(pyridine-d5, 400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (pyridine-d5, 100 MHz): see Table 1;
HR-FT-ICR-MS m/z: 821.4660 [MϩNa]ϩ (Calcd for C42H70O14Na:
821.4663).
Acid Hydrolysis and Sugar Determination of Ginsenosides SL1—SL3
(1—3) A solution of each (2.0 mg) in 1.0 M HCl (3.0 ml) was heated under
reflux for 2 h. Then, the reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo to dry-
ness. The residue was extracted with EtOAc and H2O (5 ml each, 3 times).
Next, the sugar residue, obtained by concentration of the water layer, was
dissolved in dry pyridine (0.1 ml). Then L-cysteine methyl ester hydrochlo-
ride in pyridine (0.06 M, 0.1 ml) was added to the solution. After heating the
reaction mixture at 60 °C for 2 h, 0.1 ml of trimethylsilylimidazole was 12) Baek N. I., Kim D. S., Lee Y. H., Park J. D., Jeong S. Y., Lee C. B.,
added. Heating at 60 °C was continued for a further 2 h, and the mixture was Kim S. I., Korean J. Ginseng Sci., 19, 45—50 (1995).
evaporated in vacuo to give a dried product, which was partitioned between 13) Zhao P., Liu Y. Q., Yang C. R., Phytochemistry, 41, 1419—1422
hexane and H2O.6) The hexane layer was analyzed by the GC procedure
(1996).
(General Procedures). The peaks of the hydrolysate of the ginsenoside were 14) Teng R. W., Li H. Z., Chen J. T., Wang D., He Y., Yang C. R., Magn.
detected at tR 14.12 min for D-glucose in 1 and at tR 14.12 and 4.50 min for
D-glucose and L-rhamnose in 2 and 3, respectively. The retention times for
the authentic samples (Sigma), after being treated in the similar manner,
were 14.12 min (D-glucose), 14.25 min (L-glucose), and 4.50 min (L-rham-
nose). Co-injection of the hydrolysates of the ginsenoside with standard D-
glucose/L-rhamnose gave single peaks.
Reson. Chem., 40, 483—488 (2002).
15) Lee S. M., Shon H. J., Choi C. S., Hung T. M., Min B. S., Bae K. H.,
Chem. Pharm. Bull., 57, 92—94 (2009).
16) Mosmann T., J. Immunol. Methods, 65, 55—63 (1983).
17) Azuma I., Mochizuki M., Ginseng Rev., 18, 37—39 (1994).
18) Konoshima T., Takasaki M., Tokuda M., Nat. Med., 50, 158—162
(1996).
HPLC Analysis of Ginsenosides The standard ginsenosides were iso-
lated from leaves and steamed leaves as identified in this study and previous 19) Nakata H., Kikuchi Y., Tode T., Hirata J., Kita T., Ishii K., Kudoh K.,
report.6) The saponin fractions (20 mg) from the leaves and steamed-leaves
Nagata I., Shinomiya N., Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 89, 733—740 (1998).
were dissolved in MeOH (1 ml) and filtered by 0.45 mm syringe filter. HPLC