Full Papers
[1] B. B. Fredholm, J. F. Chen, R. A. Cunha, P. Svenningsson, J. M. Vaugeois,
[2] B. B. Fredholm, A. P. IJzerman, K. A. Jacobson, K. N. Klotz, J. Linden, Phar-
macol. Rev. 2001, 53, 527–552.
acquired for a period of 180 min. The dynamic PET sinograms were
corrected for photon attenuation and scatter and reconstructed
using interactive reconstruction methods.
Reconstructed scans were imported into PMOD 3.308 software
(PMOD Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland) and motion correction
was performed by creating an average image of consecutive scans
with absence of motion, which was then used as a reference for
rigid matching of all scans in the study. An in-house-developed
baboon brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) template was
used for image co-registration and placement of volumes of inter-
est (VOIs) for quantification of radiotracer uptake. The T1-weighted
MR images were acquired with a GE Signa unit (General Electric,
Milwaukee, WI, USA) at 1.5 T with a spoiled gradient recall se-
quence with the following settings: TR=25 ms, TE=5 ms, NEX=2,
matrix=256ꢃ256, field of view=16 cm. The MR images were re-
duced from an initial matrix of 256ꢃ256 with 240 axial slices (axial
slice thickness=0.7 mm) to a 128ꢃ128 matrix with 120 axial slices
(axial slice thickness=1.4 mm). The following brain regions were
manually drawn on the MRI: striatum, caudate, putamen, frontal
cortex, temporal cortex, parietal cortex, occipital cortex, cerebellum
and whole brain. Average images of [18F]1b, [18F]1e or [18F]2e PET
data were generated by averaging the scans presenting the high-
est uptake. The generated average image was then co-registered
to the MRI template using an automatic rigid matching tool. The
transformation matrix was saved and subsequently applied to the
dynamic PET series. Finally, MRI derived VOIs were applied to the
co-registered PET images for image quantification.
[3] S. N. Schiffmann, F. Libert, G. Vassart, J. E. Dumont, J. J. Vanderhaeghen,
[5] K. Fuxe, S. Ferre, M. Canals, M. Torvinen, A. Terasmaa, D. Marcellino, S. R.
Goldberg, W. Staines, K. X. Jacobsen, C. Lluis, A. S. Woods, L. F. Agnati, R.
[6] J. F. Chen, R. Moratalla, F. Impagnatiello, D. K. Grandy, B. Cuellar, M. Ru-
binstein, M. A. Beilstein, E. Hackett, J. S. Fink, M. J. Low, E. Ongini, M. A.
[7] A. R. Carta, A. Kachroo, N. Schintu, K. Xu, M. A. Schwarzschild, J. Wardas,
[8] J. D. Salamone, A. J. Betz, K. Ishiwari, J. Felsted, L. Madson, B. Mirante, K.
Clark, L. Font, S. Korbey, T. N. Sager, J. Hockemeyer, C. E. Muller, Front.
Biosci. 2008, 13, 3594–3605.
[9] P. Popoli, D. Blum, A. Martire, C. Ledent, S. Ceruti, M. P. Abbracchio,
[10] J. Hierholzer, M. Cordes, S. Venz, L. Schelosky, C. Harisch, W. Richter, U.
Keske, N. Hosten, J. Maurer, W. Poewe, R. Felix, J. Nucl. Med. 1998, 39,
954–960.
[11] J.-F. Chen, P. K. Sonsalla, F. Pedata, A. Melani, M. R. Domenici, P. Popoli, J.
[12] A. Monopoli, G. Lozza, A. Forlani, A. Mattavelli, E. Ongini, Neuroreport
[16] Y. Molero, C. Gumpert, E. Serlachius, P. Lichtenstein, H. Walum, D. Jo-
hansson, H. Anckarsꢄter, L. Westberg, E. Eriksson, L. Halldner, Genes
[20] C. V. Gomes, M. P. Kaster, A. R. Tome, P. M. Agostinho, R. A. Cunha, Bio-
[21] B. B. Fredholm, R. A. Cunha, P. Svenningsson, Curr. Top. Med. Chem.
2003, 3, 413–426.
[23] R. J. Gillespie, S. J. Bamford, R. Botting, M. Comer, S. Denny, S. Gaur, M.
Griffin, A. M. Jordan, A. R. Knight, J. Lerpiniere, S. Leonardi, S. Lightowler,
S. McAteer, A. Merrett, A. Misra, A. Padfield, M. Reece, M. Saadi, D. L. Sel-
wood, G. C. Stratton, D. Surry, R. Todd, X. Tong, V. Ruston, R. Upton,
[24] V. Katritch, V.-P. Jaakola, J. R. Lane, J. Lin, A. P. IJzerman, M. Yeager, I. Ku-
[25] R. A. Cunha, S. Ferre, J.-M. Vaugeois, J.-F. Chen, Curr. Pharm. Des. 2008,
14, 1512–1524.
Standardized uptake values (SUV) were calculated as concentration
in the VOI divided by the injected dose divided by the animal
weight. In addition, the SUV values obtained for each brain region
were divided by the SUV values determined in the cerebellum, the
selected reference region, to generate SUV ratios (SUVr). Both SUV
and SUVr values were then plotted against time.
General synthetic method: pyrazolotriazolopyrimidine tosylate
and arylpiperazine coupling: Tosylate 5 (1.0 equiv) and arylpipera-
zine (1.9 equiv) were dissolved in DMF before the addition of trie-
thylamine (7 equiv). This mixture was heated at 808C for 16 h after
which it was allowed to cool to room temperature, and the excess
solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Mixtures of ethyl
acetate, hexane or methanol, as described in individual sections,
were added to the residue and the resulting solid product was ob-
tained by filtration.
Abbreviations
A2A: adenosine type 2A, D2: dopamine type 2, Boc: tert-butoxycar-
bonyl, DCY: decay-corrected yield, DMAP: 4-dimethylaminopyri-
dine, DME: dimethoxyethanol, DMF: N,N-dimethylformamide,
DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide, HD: Huntington’s disease, HPLC: high-
performance liquid chromatography, ID: injected dose, mCPBA:
meta-chloroperbenzoic acid, NMP: N-methylpyrrolidine, NT: not
tested, PD: Parkinson’s disease, PET: positron emission tomography,
RCP: radiochemical purity, RT: room temperature, SPECT: single
photon emission computed tomography, SUV: standardized uptake
values, SUVr: standardized uptake value ratios, TFA: trifluoroacetic
acid, TLC: thin-layer chromatography, Ts: para-toluenesulfonyl.
[26] K. Ishiwata, W. F. Wang, Y. Kimura, K. Kawamura, K. Ishii, Ann. Nucl. Med.
[27] K. Ishiwata, J. Noguchi, S. Wakabayashi, J. Shimada, N. Ogi, T. Nariai, A.
Tanaka, K. Endo, F. Suzuki, M. Senda, J. Nucl. Med. 2000, 41, 345–354.
[28] R. A. Hodgson, P. J. Bedard, G. B. Varty, T. M. Kazdoba, T. Di Paolo, M. E.
Grzelak, A. J. Pond, A. HadjTahar, N. Belanger, L. Gregoire, A. Dare, B. R.
[29] X. Zhou, S. Khanapur, A. P. Huizing, R. Zijlma, M. Schepers, R. A. J. O. Di-
[30] R. M. Moresco, S. Todde, S. Belloli, P. Simonelli, A. Panzacchi, M. Riga-
[31] A. K. Bhattacharjee, L. Lang, O. Jacobson, B. Shinkre, Y. Ma, G. Niu, W. C.
Keywords: adenosine 2A receptor · movement disorders ·
Parkinson’s disease · PET · SPECT
ChemMedChem 2016, 11, 1 – 9
7
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
&
These are not the final page numbers! ÞÞ