A R T I C L E S
Rossini and Schurko
Chart 1
NMR spectra are normally comprised of relatively broad powder
patterns which result from anisotropic NMR interactions. The
quadrupolar interaction (QI) normally determines the appearance
of such spectra, though the effects of chemical shielding
anisotropy (CSA) also significantly influence the appearance
1
of the spectra. H-45Sc dipolar coupling can be observed in
some instances. While the presence of these interactions
generally complicate solid-state NMR spectra and increase
acquisition times, they also act as a rich source of information
on molecular structure and dynamics.
Several solution 45Sc NMR studies have established a
chemical shift range of approximately 250 ppm.22-35 By
contrast, there are few reported examples of solid-state 45Sc
NMR and even fewer in which chemical shielding (CS) and
electric field gradient (EFG) tensor parameters have been
measured. In a preliminary study by Thompson and Oldfield,
the isotropic scandium chemical shift (δiso), 45Sc quadrupolar
coupling constant (CQ), and the electric field gradient asymmetry
parameter (ηQ) of Sc(OAc)3 (OAc ) acetate) and ScCl3‚6H2O
were measured.36 Solid-state 45Sc NMR was also utilized by
Han et al. to observe hydrogen diffusion in hexagonally close
packed scandium metal,37 by Kataoka et al. to observe temper-
ature-induced phase transitions in Sc(OAc)3,38 and by Koyama
et al., who examined a ternary superconductor, Sc5Co4Si10.39
Several NMR studies on ferroelectric relaxors40-43 and a variety
of Sc-containing alloys and materials of mixed composi-
tions4,9,44,45 have also been reported. In addition, due to the
favorable NMR characteristics, 45Sc NMR has been employed
for the design and optimization of pulse sequences for spin 7/2
nuclei.46-48
In this paper we report a comprehensive solid-state 45Sc NMR
study of scandium coordination complexes, in an effort to gain
an understanding of the relationship between scandium coor-
dination environments and the observed NMR parameters. The
complexes under study are pictured in Chart 1 (hydrogen atoms
and molecules not bound to scandium are omitted for clarity).
These complexes are Sc(acac)3, Sc(TMHD)3, Sc(OAc)3, Sc-
(NO3)3‚5H2O, ScCl3‚6H2O, ScCl3‚3THF, and ScCp3 (acac )
acetylacetonate, TMHD ) 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedi-
onato, THF ) tetrahydrofuran, and Cp ) cyclopentadienyl).
All of these complexes have crystal structures which were
previously reported or are reported for the first time herein.
These complexes were chosen because they afford a range of
coordination environments about the scandium nucleus leading
to the observation of an assortment of distinct CS and EFG
tensor parameters. Quantum mechanical calculations of NMR
interaction tensors are utilized to examine the orientation of
NMR tensors within molecular frames and to help rationalize
the origin of scandium NMR interactions. We also demonstrate
the application of solid-state 45Sc NMR for probing unknown
molecular structures, including the Lewis acid catalyst Sc(OTf)3
and a polystyrene microencapsulated (ME) form of Sc(OTf)3
(OTf ) SO3CF3). Application of solid-state NMR to the ME-
Sc(OTf)3 is of particular interest, since structural changes
imparted by microencapsulation increase the catalytic activity
of Sc(OTf)3 in carbon-carbon bond-forming reactions.
(22) Melson, G. A.; Olszanski, D. J.; Rahimi, A. K. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A
1977, 33, 301.
(23) Haid, E.; Kohnlein, D.; Kossler, G.; Lutz, O.; Messner, W.; Mohn, K. R.;
Nothaft, G.; Vanrickelen, B.; Schich, W.; Steinhauser, N. Z. Naturforsch.,
A: Phys. Sci. 1983, 38, 317.
(24) Bougeard, P.; Mancini, M.; Sayer, B. G.; McGlinchey, M. J. Inorg. Chem.
1985, 24, 93.
(25) Mason, J. Multinucl. NMR; Plenum Press: New York, 1987; p 480.
(26) Rehder, D.; Speh, M. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1987, 135, 73.
(27) Kirakosyan, G. A.; Tarasov, V. P.; Buslaev, Y. A. Magn. Reson. Chem.
1989, 27, 103.
(28) Randarevich, S. B.; Soloveva, L. G.; Korovin, V. Y.; Nikonov, V. I.;
Pastukhova, I. V. Koord. Khim. 1989, 15, 1581.
(29) Rehder, D.; Hink, K. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1989, 158, 265.
(30) Aramini, J. M.; Vogel, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1988.
(31) Miyake, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Kojima, Y.; Kikuchi, K.; Kobayashi, K.; Nagase,
S.; Kainosho, M.; Achiba, Y.; Maniwa, Y.; Fisher, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1996,
100, 9579.
(32) Meehan, P. R.; Willey, G. R. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1999, 284, 71.
(33) Hill, N. J.; Levason, W.; Popham, M. C.; Reid, G.; Webster, M. Polyhedron
2002, 21, 1579.
Experimental Section
Samples of tris(cyclopentadienyl) scandium (ScCp3) and scandium
chloride hexahydrate (ScCl3‚6H2O) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
Canada, Ltd., and used without further purification. A sample of
scandium acetate hydrate (Sc(OAc)3‚xH2O) was acquired from Sigma-
Aldrich Canada, Ltd., and was recrystallized from a 5.0 M aqueous
solution of acetic acid and dried in vaccuo to produce anhydrous
scandium acetate (Sc(OAc)3). Samples of tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-
heptanedionato)scandium (Sc(TMHD)3), scandium nitrate pentahydrate
(Sc(NO3)3‚5H2O), scandium trifluoromethanesulfonate (Sc(OTf)3), and
scandium trifluoromethanesulfonate microencapsulated in a styrene
polymer (ME-Sc(OTf)3) were purchased from Strem Chemicals, Inc.,
and used without further purification. Samples of scandium tris-
(acetylacetonate) (Sc(acac)3) and scandium chloride tris(tetrahydrofuran)
(ScCl3‚3THF) were synthesized in the research laboratories of Prof.
Warren Piers at the University of Calgary using standard procedures.49,50
(34) Petrosyants, S. P.; Ilyukhin, A. B. Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 2004, 30, 194.
(35) Gierezyk, B.; Schroeder, G. Pol. J. Chem. 2003, 77, 1741.
(36) Thompson, A. R.; Oldfield, E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987, 27.
(37) Han, J. W.; Chang, C. T.; Torgeson, D. R.; Seymour, E. F. W.; Barnes, R.
G. Phys. ReV. B: Condens. Matter 1987, 36, 615.
(38) Kataoka, H.; Takeda, S.; Nakamura, N. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1993, 62, 1478.
(39) Koyama, T.; Sugita, H.; Wada, S.; Tsutsumi, K. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1999,
68, 2326.
(40) Glinchuk, M. D.; Bykov, I. P.; Laguta, V. V.; Nokhrin, S. N. Ferroelectrics
1997, 199, 173.
(41) Blinc, R.; Zalar, B.; Gregorovic, A.; Pirc, R.; Glinchuk, M. D. Ferroelectrics
2000, 240, 1473.
(42) Laguta, V. V.; Glinchuk, M. D.; Nokhrin, S. N.; Bykov, I. P.; Blinc, R.;
Gregorovic, A.; Zalar, B. Phys. ReV. B: Condens. Matter 2003, 67.
(43) Laguta, V. V.; Glinchuk, M. D.; Bykov, I. P.; Blinc, R.; Zalar, B. Phys.
ReV. B: Condens. Matter 2004, 69, 054103.
(44) Sato, K.; Takeda, S.; Fukuda, S.; Minamisono, T.; Tanigaki, M.; Miyake,
T.; Maruyama, Y.; Matsuta, K.; Fukuda, M.; Nojiri, Y. Z. Naturforsch., A:
Phys. Sci. 1998, 53, 549.
(45) Tien, C.; Charnaya, E. V.; Sun, S. Y.; Wu, R. R.; Ivanov, S. N.; Khazanov,
E. N. Phys. Status Solidi B 2002, 233, 222.
(46) Madhu, P. K.; Johannessen, O. G.; Pike, K. J.; Dupree, R.; Smith, M. E.;
Levitt, M. H. J. Magn. Reson. 2003, 163, 310.
(48) Brauniger, T.; Ramaswamy, K.; Madhu, P. K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004,
383, 403.
(49) Atwood, J. L.; Smith, K. D. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1974, 921.
(47) Morais, C. M.; Lopes, M.; Fernandez, C.; Rocha, J. Magn. Reson. Chem.
2003, 41, 679.
9
10392 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 32, 2006