3044
I. Scalise, E. N. Durantini / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13 (2005) 3037–3045
´
culture tubes (13 · 100 mm) was used and the sensitizer
was added from a stock solution of phthalocyanine
(3.0 · 10À3 M) in DMF. Viable bacteria were monitored
and their number calculated by counting the number of
colony forming units after appropriated dilution on agar
plates.8 Bacterial cultures grown under the same condi-
tions and light exposures, but without addition of any
photosensitizer, served as controls.
tina, Fundacion Antorchas and SECYT Universidad
´
Nacional de Rıo Cuarto for financial support. E.N.D.
is a Scientific Member of CONICET.
References and notes
1. Villanueva, A.; Vidania, R.; Stockert, J. C.; Can˜ete, M.;
Juarrans, A. Photodynamic effects on cultured tumor cells.
Cytoskeleton alterations and cell death mechanisms. In
Photobiology; Nalwa, H. S., Ed.; Handbook of Photo-
chemistry and Photobiology; American Scientific, 2002;
Vol. 4, Chapter 3, pp 79–117.
2. Ackroyd, R.; Kelty, C.; Brown, N.; Reed, M. The history
of photodetection and photodynamic therapy. Photochem.
Photobiol. 2001, 74, 656–669.
3. Bonnett, R. Chemical Aspects of Photodynamic Therapy;
Gordon and Breach Science: Amsterdam, 2000.
4. DeRosa, M. C.; Crutchley, R. J. Photosensitized singlet
oxygen and its applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 233–
234, 351–371.
5. Ochsner, M. Photophysical and photobiological processes
in photodynamic therapy of tumours. J. Photochem.
Photobiol. B: Biol. 1997, 39, 1–18.
3.7. Phthalocyanine binding to bacteria cells
Suspensions of E. coli (2 mL, ꢀ106 CFU/mL) in PBS
were incubated in the dark at 37 ꢀC with 10 lM of sen-
sitizer for different times. The cultures were centrifuged
(3000g for 15 min) and then washed with PBS. The cell
pellets obtained by centrifugation (3000g for 15 min)
were re-suspended in 2% aqueous SDS (2 mL), incu-
bated overnight at 4 ꢀC and sonicated for 30 min. The
concentration of sensitizer in the supernatant was mea-
sured by spectrofluorimetry (kexc = 670 nm, kem
=
684 nm) in solution of 2% SDS in PBS. The fluorescence
values obtained from each sample were referred to the
total number of bacteria contained in the suspension.
The concentration of the phthalocyanine in this sample
was estimated by comparison with a calibration curve
obtained with standard solutions of the sensitizer in
2% w/v SDS ([sensitizer]ꢀ0.05–0.5 lM).
6. Taylor, P. W.; Stapleton, P. D.; Luzio, J. P. New ways to
treat bacterial infections. Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7,
1086–1091.
7. Hamblin, M. R.; Hasan, T. Photodynamic therapy: a new
antimicrobial approach to infectious disease? Photochem.
Photobiol. Sci. 2004, 3, 436–450.
8. Minnock, A.; Vernon, D. I.; Schofield, J.; Griffiths, J.;
Parish, J. H.; Brown, S. B. Photoinactivation of bacteria.
Use of a cationic water-soluble zinc phthalocyanines to
photoinactivate both Gram-negative and Gram-positive
bacteria. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 1996, 32, 159–
164.
9. Wood, S.; Nattress, B.; Kirkham, J.; Shore, R.; Brookes,
S.; Griffiths, J.; Robinson, C. An in vitro study of the use
of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of natural oral
plaque biofilms formed in vivo. J. Photochem. Photobiol.
B: Biol. 1999, 50, 1–7.
10. Minnock, A.; Vernon, D. I.; Schofield, J.; Griffiths, J.;
Parish, J. H.; Brown, S. B. Mechanism of uptake of a
cationic water-soluble pyridinium zinc phthalocyanine
across the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 522–527.
11. Segalla, A.; Borsarelli, C. D.; Braslavsky, S. E.; Spikes, J.
D.; Roncucci, G.; Dei, D.; Chiti, G.; Jori, G.; Reddi, E.
Photophysical, photochemical and antibacterial photosen-
sitizing properties of a novel octacationic Zn (II)-phtha-
locyanine. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2002, 1, 641–648.
12. Lacey, J. A.; Phillips, D. The photosensitization of
Escherichia coli using disulphonated aluminium phthalo-
cyanines. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 2001, 142,
145–150.
13. Milanesio, M. E.; Moran, M. S.; Yslas, E. I.; Alvarez, M.
G.; Rivarola, V.; Durantini, E. N. Synthesis and biological
evaluation of methoxyphenyl porphyrin derivatives as
potential photodynamic agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001,
9, 1943–1949.
14. Milanesio, M. E.; Alvarez, M. G.; Yslas, E. I.; Borsarelli,
C. D.; Silber, J. J.; Rivarola, V.; Durantini, E. N.
Photodynamic studies of metallo 5,10,15,20-tetrakis-
(4-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin: photochemical character-
ization and biological consequences in a human carcinoma
cell line. Photochem. Photobiol. 2001, 74, 14–21.
15. Scalise, I.; Durantini, E. N. Photodynamic effect of
metallo 5-(4-carboxyphenyl)-10,15,20-tris(4-methylphen-
yl) porphyrins in biomimetic AOT reverse micelles
3.8. Photosensitized inactivation of bacteria cells
Cell suspensions of E. coli (2 mL, ꢀ106 CFU/mL) in
PBS were incubated with 10 lM of phthalocyanine for
30 min in the dark at 37 ꢀC. After that, the cultures were
washed once with PBS and re-suspended in 2 mL of
PBS. The cultures were exposed for different time inter-
vals to visible light (350–800 nm). Control experiments
were carried out without illumination in the absence
and in the presence of sensitizer. Control and irradiated
cell suspensions were serially diluted with PBS, each
solution was plated in triplicate on TS agar and the
number of colonies formed after 18–24 h incubation at
37 ꢀC was counted. Each experiment was repeated sepa-
rately three times.
3.9. Growth delay experiment
E. coli cells were grown overnight as described above. A
portion (60 lL) of this culture was transferred to 20 mL
of fresh TS broth (10%) medium. The suspension was
homogenized and aliquots of 2 mL were incubated at
37 ꢀC. The culture grown was measured by turbidity at
550 nm using a Tuner SP-830 spectrophotometer.8
When the cultures reached the log phase (absorbance
ꢀ0.1), 10 lM of sensitizer was added. Then, the flasks
were irradiated with visible light as described above.
Samples were also taken to determine the viability of
the cells as described earlier.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Consejo Nacional de Inves-
´ ´
tigaciones Cientıficas y Tecnicas (CONICET) of Argen-