Stimuli-responsive cyclometalated platinum complex bearing bent molecular geometry for highly efficient solution-processable OLEDs

Article abstract of DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.005

Smart materials, such as stimuli-responsive luminescence, have attracted much attentions due to their potential application in semiconductor filed. In this context, platinum complexes of (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac) and (dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac) were prepared and charac

Full text of DOI:10.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.005

Journal Pre-proof
Stimuli-responsive cyclometalated platinum complex bearing bent
molecular geometry for highly efficient solution-processable OLEDs
Zhenhua Wei, Kai Zhang, Chan Kyung Kim, Shuai Tan, Shaojie
Wang, Lin Wang, Jun Li, Yafei Wang
PII:
S1001-8417(20)30282-5
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.005
CCLET 5643
DOI:
Reference:
To appear in:
Chinese Chemical Letters
Received Date:
Revised Date:
Accepted Date:
16 March 2020
24 April 2020
6 May 2020
Please cite this article as: Wei Z, Zhang K, Kim CK, Tan S, Wang S, Wang L, Li J, Wang Y,
Stimuli-responsive cyclometalated platinum complex bearing bent molecular geometry for
highly efficient solution-processable OLEDs, Chinese Chemical Letters (2020),
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.05.005
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as
the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the
definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and
review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early
visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be
discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal
pertain.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier.

Chinese Chemical Letters
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com
Communication
Stimuli-responsive cyclometalated platinum complex bearing bent molecular
geometry for highly efficient solution-processable OLEDs
Zhenhua Weia,d,1, Kai Zhanga,1, Chan Kyung Kimc,1, Shuai Tana,d, Shaojie Wangb,f, Lin Wangb,f,, Jun Lie,
Yafei Wanga*
a National Experimental Demonstration Center for Materials Science and Engineering (Changzhou University), Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of
Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Light-Electricity-Heat Energy-Converting Materials and Applications, School of
Materials Science & Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
b Center for High Pressure Science (CHiPS), State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004,
China
c Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea
d College of Chemistry, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
e School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China
f Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Shanghai 201203, China
Corresponding authors.
E-mail addresses: wanglin@hpstar.ac.cn (L. Wang); qiji830404@hotmail.com (Y. Wang)
1These authors are contributed equally to this work.
Article history:
Received 16 March 2020
Received in revised form 24 April 2020
Accepted 28 April 2020
Available online
Graphical Abstract
Two platinum complexes with charming external-stimuli-responsive emission were prepared and characterized. Solution-
processable OLEDs based on the platinum complexes showed a maximum EQE of ⁓18%.
Smart materials, such as stimuli-responsive luminescence, have attracted much attentions due to their potential application in semiconductor filed. In this
context, platinum complexes of (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac) and (dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac) were prepared and characterized, in which (2-(4',6'-difluorophenyl)pyridinato-
N,C2')(2,4-pentanedionato-O,O)Pt(II) was used as the planar emission core and 9-(4-(phenylsulfonyl)phenyl)-9H-carbazole (DC) was regard as the bent
pendent. Both platinum complexes showed bright emission in solution and solid state, concomitant with charming external-stimuli-responsive emission under
mechanical grinding, organic solvent vapors and pressure. The change emission color spanned from yellow to near-infrared region. Using the platinum
complexes as the dopant, solution processable organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) were fabricated and a maximum external quantum efficiency of ⁓18% was
———

achieved, which is the highest value among the reported solution-processable OLEDs based on external-stimuli-responsive luminescence. This research
demonstrated that platinum complex can show promising stimuli responsive emission via ingenious molecular design, indicating a novel way for developing the
smart materials in semiconductor filed.
Keywords:
Stimuli responsive emission
Platinum complex
Solution-processable OLEDs
Synthesis and property
Since the pioneer work of Forrest et al. in 1998 [1], cyclometalated platinum complex has become a research hotspot in organic light-
emitting diodes (OLEDs) due to its intrinsic planar structure, theoretical 100% internal quantum efficiency and rich emissive
characteristic (metal-to-ligand charge transfer, ligand-to-ligand charge transfer, metal-metal-to-ligand charge transfer, etc.) [2]. Over the
past several decades, considerable cyclometalated-platinum complexes spanning from blue emission to near-infrared emission have
been developed with very high external quantum efficiency of >20% in OLEDs [3].
As we know, the unique square-planar structure and strong intermolecular Pt-Pt interaction play a crucial role in the luminescent
property of platinum complex [4]. This feature of platinum complex was also extensively employed as stimuli-responsive materials
showing the varied emission color dependent on the π-π/or Pt-Pt distance [5], which has attracted much attention by researchers
recently because of their promising applications in organic semiconductor [6]. Generally, the strategy for the stimuli-responsive
platinum complex adopted planar N-containing heterocyclic ligand, such as azole, bipyridine, and pincer ligand (Fig. 1) [6,7]. Few
platinum complexes bearing acetylacetone ligand exhibited emission color changed with external-stimuli conditions. In addition, due to
the emission quenching by the rigid and planar structural, little stimuli-responsive platinum complexes were employed as an emitter in
OLEDs, let alone solution-processable OLEDs. Chi et al. reported a platinum complex based on pyrazole chelate which showed
mechanoluminescence and concentration dependent photoluminescence. Using this platinum complexes as the emitter, the OLEDs
fabricated via vacuum deposition showed a blue emission with the maximum external quantum efficiency (EQE) of 9.1% [8]. Therefore,
there is an urgent need to explore novel platinum complexes which can show external stimuli luminescence response and definitely
have a promising application in solution-processable OLEDs.
To solve this issue, herein, we proposed that the molecule should not only possess planar structure but also have appropriate steric
hindrance, in which the planar moiety can possess good intermolecular π-π interaction and the steric hindrance affects the molecular
packing,
probably
in
favor
of
the
external
stimuli,
such
as pressure and grinding (Fig. 1). On the other hand, the steric structure has a positive effect on suppressing the emission quenching in
solid state and increasing the solubility, implying a promising application in solution processable OLEDs. With these in mind, we
employed the typical platinum complex of (dfppy)Pt(acac)[(2-(4',6'-difluorophenyl)pyridinato-N,C2')(2,4-pentanedionato-O,O)Pt(II)]
as the emission core, which has a square-planar structure. Then a second emissive fragment of 9-(4-(phenylsulfonyl)phenyl)-9H-
carbazole (DC) bearing bent shape was introduced into the cyclometalating ligand (Fig. 2). In order to further explore the molecular
structure-property relationship, an oxygen atom was integrated between the platinum complex-based emission core and the DC moiety,
probably playing a crucial role on the molecular packing. To prove our hypothesis, two platinum complexes of (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac)
and (dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac)bearing bent shape were prepared and characterized, and their structure-property relationship was explored
systematically.
Fig. 1. Molecular strategy for the platinum complex.

Fig. 2. The molecular structures (a and b) and crystal structures (c and d, hydrogen atoms are omitted).
As shown in Scheme S1 (Supporting information), both platinum complexes were synthesized and confirmed by 1H NMR, TOF-MS
and X-ray crystal diffraction. Single crystals of the platinum complexes were obtained from chloroform/methanol solution and
confirmed by X-ray crystallography. As expected, both platinum complex moieties are square planar geometry (Fig. 2), while the DC
fragment showed a twist configuration with the dihedral angels (between carbazole and diphenyl sulfone) of 59.97o and 57.12o in
(dfppy-DC)Pt(acac) and (dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac), respectively (Tables S1 and S2 in Supporting information). The platinum complexes
also form a charming crystal stacking and relatively large distance of Pt…Pt (Figs. S1 and S2 in Supporting information).
The platinum complexes show two main absorption bands between 300 and 550 nm (Figs. S3 and S4 in Supporting information).
The absorption band at about 337±1 nm is assigned to the π-π* transition of the aromatic ring, while the absorption bands in the range
of 350⁓450 nm are attributed to the mixture of metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) and intraligand charge transfer (ILCT)
transitions. Compared to (dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac), (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac) exhibits a clearly red-shifted absorption spectrum owing to its
extended conjugation. The DFT results reveal that the 9-phenylcarbazole moiety makes the major contribution to the highest occupied
molecular orbitals (HOMO) for both platinum complexes. The lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO) mainly localizes at 2,4-
difluorophenylpyridine, diphenyl sulfone and platinum atom (Fig. S5 in Supporting information). Obviously, the integrated oxygen
atom shows a negligible effect on HOMO and LUMO patterns.
Fig. 3. Fluorescent and phosphorescent emission spectra of platinum complexes in toluene solution (10-5 mol/L) with the excitation
wavelength of 360 nm: (a) (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac), the dot line is 10 times of fluorescence at room temperature between 380 nm and 460 nm; (b)
(dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac).
With the excitation wavelength of 360 nm, the photoluminescence (PL) of both platinum complexes present clearly dual emissions
in degassed toluene solution at room temperature (Fig. 3). The weak emission bands at short-wavelength (ca. 412 nm and 437 nm) can
be contributed to the phenylpyridine-diphenyl sulfone-carbazole fragment, whereas the intense and broad structured emission bands in
the long wavelength (480⁓600 nm, Table S3 in Supporting information) are contributed to a mixture of MLCT and ligand center
transitions of the platinum complexes [9]. Compared to (dfppyPt-DC)Pt(acac), complex (dfppyPt-O-DC)Pt(acac) exhibits a distinct
blue-shifted emission spectrum in long-wavelength due to the destroyed π conjugation. It is noted that a short luminescence decay
profiles of nanosecond was found for the emission bands between 410 nm and 440 nm and a long lifetime of microsecond was
detected for the emission bands at long-wavelength (Table S3), implying fluorescence and phosphorescence, respectively. In degassed
toluene solution, satisfied photoluminescent quantum yields (PLQY) of 58% and 18% were achieved for complexes (dfppyPt-
DC)Pt(acac) and (dfppyPt-O-DC)Pt(acac), respectively. Based on the lifetime and PLQY, the radiative rate constant (kr) were
calculated to be 5.40×105 s-1 and 3.62×105 s-1 and the nonradiative rate constant (knr) were evaluated to be 4.07×105 s-1 and 1.65×106 s-1
for complexes (dfppyPt-DC)Pt(acac) and (dfppyPt-O-DC)Pt(acac), respectively (Table S3). Definitely, complex (dfppyPt-O-
DC)Pt(acac) presents a sky-blue emission with relatively low PLQY due to the very large knr. At 77 K, both platinum complexes in
degassed toluene solution show analogous emission spectra with those of at room temperature (Fig. 3). However, the characteristic
hypsochromic shift of the low-temperature PL spectra in freeze is observed for both platinum complexes at long-wavelength, probably
due to the motional relaxation of the excited-state geometry which is prone to be affected by the rigidity of the matrix [10]. On the
other hand, negligible change for the emission bands at short-wavelength suggests it could be attributed to the ligand center transitions.

Fig. 4. PL spectra (a) and powder XRD patterns (b) of (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac) in different state at room temperature. Insert: Images of (dfppy-
DC)Pt(acac) under UV light with 365 nm (P: pristine; G: ground; F: fumed).
Due to the interesting molecular packing in crystal, we put insight into the emission property under applying external conditions,
such as grinding and fuming. As expected, (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac) showed charming mechanochromic luminescenceproperties. The PL
spectra of the solid samples under different stimuli and the photographs under UV light are shown in Fig. 4. Compared to the PL
profile in solution, (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac) presents a red-shifted emission spectrum with a maximum emission peak centered at 573 nm
and a shoulder of 538 nm in pristine sample, which can be explained by the strong molecular aggregation in solid state. At the same
time, the powder XRD (PXRD) pattern displays a lot of intense and sharp diffraction peaks in the range of 5⁓60o (Fig. 4b), implying
micro-crystalline structure in pristine state. Grinding the sample with pestle in a mortar, distinct red shift with a maximum emission
peak at 637 nm is observed (Fig. 4a). It can be attributed to the decreased Pt-Pt distance, and leading to metal-metal-to-ligand charge
transfer (MMLCT) transitions [11]. Therefore, the molecular stacking in ground state should be closer than that of pristine state (Fig.
S6 in Supporting information). As for the PXRD patterns in ground state, all the intense and sharp diffraction peaks in pristine state are
disappeared, while some weak and broad diffraction peaks turn out. This change in the PXRD pattern demonstrates that (dfppy-
DC)Pt(acac) is transformed to partially amorphous aggregates after grinding [11], which is also responsible for the emission color
change. After fuming in dichloromethane vapor for 15 min, the emission profile almost recovers to that of pristine state. However, the
emission band at about 620 nm still exists after fuming, probably due to the molecular state assessed as neither too tight nor too loose
(Fig. S6). Similarly, the PXRD pattern of fuming with intense and sharp diffraction peaks is well match with that of pristine, implying
that a micro-crystalline structure is obtained after fuming. Obviously, the mechanochromism luminescence behavior of this platinum
complex is ascribed to the Pt-Pt distance and intermolecular interaction. Unfortunately, we did not find the mechanochromic
luminescence for (dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac) after grinding, probably due to the different molecular aggregation in crystal which is
insensitive to the mechanical grinding.
Fig. 5. Pictures of platinum complexes during the pressurizing process at room temperature, (a-d) (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac), (e-h) (dfppy-O-
DC)Pt(acac).
To further investigate the effect of molecular packing in the crystal on the luminescence, hydrostatic pressure-dependent
luminescence of both platinum complexes was carried out at room temperature via diamond anvil cell (DAC) equipment (Fig. 5 and
Fig. S7 in Supporting information). The crystal (recrystallization from CH3OH/CHCl3, the same below) of (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac) shows
structured emission with a maximum emissive peak at 578 nm with the shoulders at about 532, 619 and 681 nm under ambient

condition. When the pressure was gradually increased from 1 atm to 20 GPa, the emissive intensity gradually decreases, probably due
to the stronger intermolecular interaction leading to increased non-radiative transition. Simultaneously, the emissive spectra present
obviously red shift with the increase of pressure. The maximum emissive peak is from 578 nm at 1 atm to 690 nm at 19.91 GPa,
implying the colors of the crystal underwent a remarkable change from green to near-infrared with the increase of pressure. As shown
in Fig. 5, the visualized colors of the samples at different pressures can also illustrate the changed emission profiles. This red-shifted
emission can be explained by the shorter distance of the adjacent platinum centers. According to the previous reports [10,12], the
distance between Pt-Pt decreases with increasing pressure generating to an destabilized valence band due to the overlap of the dz2
HOMO orbitals from all platinum centers, whereas the vacant pz orbital of adjacent platinum centers start to overlap and form a stable
conduction band, leading to the drastic decrease in the luminescence energy. Compared to (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac), complex (dfppy-O-
DC)Pt(acac) exhibits an analogous piezochromism luminescence behavior. The variation tendency of (dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac) in
emissive peak and intensity under the pressure change is the same with that of (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac). At ambient pressure, (dfppy-O-
DC)Pt(acac) shows a structureless emissive band centered at 608 nm. When the pressure is 5.4 GPa, the spectrum shows a clearly
additional emissive band at about 857 nm. In addition, the emissive intensity at ⁓850 nm gradually increases with the increasing
pressure, probably due to the increased MMLCT effect with the decreased Pt-Pt distance. Obviously, introduction of oxygen atom
apparently plays a key role in the external-stimuli-responsive emission.
To evaluate the electroluminescent property, solution-processable OLEDs were fabricated (Fig. S8 in Supporting information). The
electroluminescent (EL) spectra and external quantum efficiency (EQE)-current density curves of the devices are shown in Fig. 6. The
EL spectra, similar with the PL profiles, exhibit the maximum emission peaks at 488 nm and 524 nm for (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac) and
(dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac), respectively, implyingthat the emissions are dominated from the platinum complexes. In addition, the
disappeared emission from CzAcSF means that there is a complete energy transfer from the host to the dopant. The Commission
Internationale de L'Eclairage (CIE) are (0.33, 0.56) and (0.22, 0.45) for (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac) and (dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac)-based devices,
respectively. As shown in Fig. S9 in Supporting information, the (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac) based device shows a turn-on voltage (Vturn-on, at
1.0 cd/m2) of 4.0 V, while the device based on complex (dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac) has a lower Vturn-on of 2.8 V. Due to the smaller knr and
higher PLQY, (dfppy-DC)Pt(acac)-based device possesses better performances with a highest EQE of 17.79%, current efficiency (CE)
of 58.31 cd/A and luminance of 5463 cd/cm2. The (dfppy-O-DC)Pt(acac)-based device show a maximum EQE of 13.47%, current
efficiency (CE) of 38.45 cd/A and luminance of 2861 cd/cm2. Increased with the dopant concentration, the devices present inferior
performances with decreased EQE due to the concentration quenching.
Fig. 6. The current density-EQE curves of the devices with 5 wt% dopant concentration. Insert: the EL spectra of the devices.
In summary, two novel cyclometalated platinum complexes with bent geometry were synthesized and characterized. The
intermolecular interaction was varied and dependent on the external stimulus which results in the changed emission color from green
to near-infrared region for the platinum complexes. Compared to the previous reports, this bent geometry based cyclometalated
platinum complexes showed universal external-stimuli-responsive emission. The mechanism of external-stimuli-responsive emission
implied that the distances of the π-π planar and platinum center are the responsible for the change in the emission profiles. Employing
both platinum complexes as the dopant in solution-processable OLEDs, a maximum external quantum efficiency of ⁓18% was
achieved which is among the highest efficiency for the devices based on external-stimuli-responsive materials. This research
demonstrated that an elaborate regulation on molecular geometry would be an effective method for designing smart materials.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that
could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments
Financial support was from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51773021, 51911530197, U1663229), Six
Talent Peaks Project inJiangsu Province (No. XCL-102), the Talent Project of Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professor, Natural Science
Fund for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (No. 19KJA430002).
References
[1] M.A. Baldo, D.F. O'Brien, Y. You, et al., Nature 395 (1998) 151-154.
[2] (a) M. Chaaban, C. Zhou, H. Lin, B. Chyi, B. Ma, J. Mater. Chem. C 7 (2019) 5910-5924;
(b) C. Fan, C. Yang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 6439-6469;
(c) X. Yang, G. Zhou, W.Y. Wong, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 8484-8575.
[3] (a) J. Zhao, Z. Feng, D. Zhong, et al., Chem. Mater. 30 (2018) 929-946;
(b) Z. Zhu, C. Park, K. Klimes, J. Li, Adv. Optical Mater. 7 (2019) 1801518-1801523;
(c) K. Kim, J. Liao, S.W. Lee, et al., Adv. Mater. 28 (2016) 2526-2532.
[4] (a) S. Yang, F. Meng, X. Wu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 6 (2018) 5769-5777;
(b) S. Tan, X. Wu, Y. Zheng, Y. Wang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 30 (2019) 1951-1954.
[5] (a) K. Li, Y. Chen, W. Lu, N. Zhu, C.M. Che, Chem. –Eur. J. 47 (2011) 4109-4112;
(b) J. Ni, X. Zhang, Y.H. Wu, L.Y. Zhang, Z.N. Chen, Chem. –Eur. J.47 (2011) 1171-1183.
[6] (a) Y. Shigeta, A. Kobayashi, M. Yoshida, M. Kato, Inorg. Chem. 58 (2019) 7385-7392;
(b) A. Kobayashi, H. Hara, T. Yonemura, H.C. Chang, M. Kato, Dalton Trans. 41 (2012) 1878-1888;
(c) O.S. Wenger, Chem. Rev. 113 (2013) 3686-3733;
(d) Q. Zhao, F. Li, C. Huang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39 (2010) 3007-3030.
[7] (a) C. Cuerva, J.A. Campo, M. Cano, C. Lodeiro, Chem. -Eur. J. 22 (2016) 10168-10178;
(b) K. Ohno, Y. Kusano, S. Kaizaki, A. Nagasawa, T. Fujihara, Inorg. Chem. 57 (2018) 14159-14169;
(c) X. Zhang, J.Y. Wang, J. Ni, L.Y. Zhang, Z.N. Chen, Inorg. Chem. 51 (2012) 5569;
(d) S. Carrara, A. Aliprandi, C. F. Hogan, L. De Cola, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 14605-14610.
[8] L. Huang, G. Tu, Y. Chi, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 1 (2013) 7582-7592.
[9] M. Han, Y. Tian, Z. Yuan, L. Zhu, B. Ma, Angew. Chem. Inter. Ed. 53 (2014) 10908-10912.
[10] Y. You, K.S. Kim, T.K. Ahn, D. Kim, S.Y. Park, J. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 4052-4060.
[11] C. Cuerva, J.A. Campo, M. Cano, C. Lodeiro, Chem. –Eur. J.22 (2016) 10168-10178.
[12] G. Levasseur-Thériault, C. Reber, C. Aronica, D. Luneau, Inorg. Chem. 45 (2006) 2379-2381.