in general,19-22 there remains a need for general and mild
techniques that are effective in the cyclization of these
difficult sequences.
We examined the utility of the CuI-promoted alkyne/azide
cycloaddition reaction in the macrocyclization of resin-bound
tri-, tetra-, penta-, hexa-, and heptapeptides. We were
interested in the cyclization efficiency of linear peptides that
might present challenging cyclizations under traditional
lactamization conditions. We chose a leucine-rich sequence
that lacked â-turn-promoting structures, such as proline or
glycine, and which contained only L-amino acids. We
envisioned the use of L-propargyl glycine as a C-terminal,
aspartic acid surrogate in a side-chain cycloaddition/macro-
cyclization with an N-terminal L-azido-leucine (Scheme 1).
The triazole moiety has been utilized in â-turn mimetic
peptides23 and as an isostere of the amide bond.24-28 Recently,
a Huisgen-type 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction generat-
ing a 1,4-disubstituted-1,2,3-triazolesthe so-called “click
reaction”swas used as an amide bond surrogate and cy-
clization aid in the solution-phase synthesis of a cyclic
tetrapeptide analogue.29 Previous attempts to synthesize
cyclo[L-Pro-L-Val-L-Pro-L-Tyr] via lactamization proved
unfruitful, despite the presence of two turn-promoting struc-
tures in the sequence.30 The “ring contraction” mechanism
of the CuI-catalyzed alkyne/azide cycloaddition reaction,
together with the increased ring size of the triazole analog,
was proposed to promote cyclization more efficiently than
macrolactamization.31-34 The target tetrapeptide analogue
was achieved with 70% yield by refluxing the linear peptide
with a copper(I) catalyst at 110 °C for 16 h. This solution-
phase macrocyclization demonstrated the proficiency of the
1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction under conditions where
lactamization failed, but there have been no reports on the
applicability of the click reaction as a macrocyclization tool
in the solid-phase synthesis of small cyclic peptides, or
its potential for use in the synthesis of cyclic peptide
libraries.
Scheme 1. Click Macrocyclization of Propargyl Glycine
Azido Leucine (Path A) Is an Analogue of Aspartic Acid
Side-Chain Macrocyclization (Path B)
(16) Klose, J.; Ehrlich, A.; Bienert, M. Lett. Pept. Sci. 1998, 5, 129-
131.
(17) El Haddadi, M.; Cavelier, F.; Vives, E.; Azmani, A.; Verducci, J.;
Martinez, J. J. Pept. Sci. 2000, 6, 560-570.
(18) Besser, D.; Olender, R.; Rosenfeld, R.; Arad, O.; Reissmann, S. J.
Pept. Res. 2000, 56, 337-345.
(19) Ehrlich, A.; Heyne, H. U.; Winter, R.; Beyermann, M.; Haber, H.;
Carpino, L. A.; Bienert, M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8831-8838.
(20) Spatola, A. F.; Darlak, K.; Romanovskis, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 591-594.
Since any amino acid with a primary amine can be converted
into the corresponding azido-acid,35 this C-terminal alkyne/
N-terminal azide motif would maximize the potential size
of a cyclic peptide library by allowing the N-terminal position
at which macrocyclization occurs to be a point of diversity
in a parallel split-pool synthesis.
We investigated the general feasibility of this macrocy-
clization technique under the standard solid-phase peptide
synthesis conditions used to generate peptide libraries,
employing the acid labile 2-chlorotrityl chloride resin to
perform a parallel split-split synthesis (Scheme 2). Each
amino acid coupling was verified by the bromophenol blue
test,36 and the final macrocyclization step was carried out at
room temperature using commercially available CuI salts,
sodium ascorbate, DIEA, 2,6-lutidine, and DMF.
(21) Carpino, L. A.; Elfaham, A.; Albericio, F. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
3561-3564.
(22) Carpino, L. A.; Imazumi, H.; El-Faham, A.; Ferrer, F. J.; Zhang,
C. W.; Lee, Y. S.; Foxman, B. M.; Henklein, P.; Hanay, C.; Mugge, C.;
Wenschuh, H.; Klose, K.; Beyermann, M.; Bienert, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 442-445.
(23) Oh, K.; Guan, Z. Chem. Commun. 2006, 3069-3071.
(24) (a) Brik, A.; Alexandratos, J.; Lin, Y. C.; Elder, J. H.; Olson, A. J.;
Wlodawer, A.; Goodsell, D. S.; Wong, C. H. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 1167-
1169. (b) Angell, Y.; Burgess, K. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9595-9598.
(25) Bock, V. D.; Speijer, D.; Hiemstra, H.; van Maarseveen, J. H. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 971-975.
(26) Hitotsuyanagi, Y.; Motegi, S.; Hasuda, T.; Takeya, K. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 1111-1114.
(27) Horne, W. S.; Stout, C. D.; Ghadiri, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 9372-9376.
(28) Horne, W. S.; Yadav, M. K.; Stout, C. D.; Ghadiri, M. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15366-15367.
(29) (a) Huisgen, R. 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition: introduction, survey,
mechanism. In 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry; Padwa, A., Ed.;
Wiley: New York, 1984; Vol. 1, pp 1-176. (b) Kolb, H. C.; Sharpless, K.
B. Drug DiscoVery Today 2003, 8, 1128-1137. (c) Bock, V. D.; Perci-
accante, R.; Jansen, T. P.; Hiemstra, H.; van Maarseveen, J. H. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 919-922.
Initially, we investigated the efficiency of the macrocy-
clization using catalytic CuBr (0.2 equiv). We found that
the long reaction times of 24-72 h were impractical and
fostered a mixture of cyclic and linear products, regardless
of the presence or absence of other additives such as sodium
ascorbate or nitrogenous bases. We were pleased to find that
(30) Schmidt, U.; Langner, J. J. Pept. Res. 1997, 49, 67-73.
(31) (a) Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596-2599. (b) Rodionov, V. O.; Fokin, V. V.;
Finn, M. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2210-2215.
(32) Roice, M.; Johannsen, I.; Meldal, M. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2004, 23,
662-673.
(33) Bodine, K. D.; Gin, D. Y.; Gin, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 1638-1639.
(34) Bock, V. D.; Hiemstra, H.; van Maarseveen, J. H. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 1, 51-68.
(35) Lundquist, J. T. t.; Pelletier, J. C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 781-783.
(36) Kay, C.; Lorthioir, O. E.; Parr, N. J.; Congreve, M.; McKeown, S.
C.; Scicinski, J. J.; Ley, S. V. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 71, 110-118.
5012
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 24, 2007