3744 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 105, No. 15, 2001
Okutsu et al.
the spin polarization inversion is due to the complex forma-
tion: free benzil gives absorptive CIDEP through TM, whereas
the complex of benzil with TEA yields the emissive one through
TM, too, which is opposite to the spin polarization of the triplet
produces benzil ketyl in our system, Mz(t ) 0)/Peq ) 0 M was
chosen as the initial condition.
The equations were solved numerically up to t ) 1.5 µs. [BH•]
was calculated from eq 13. The results are shown in Figure 5
as a solid line against the initial concentration of TEA. Since
the concentrations of the complex and hence produced ketyl
are low at low concentration of TEA, RTPM does not work
efficiently and emissive CIDEP signals are weak. The chemical
equilibrium (1) moves to the right with the increase in TEA
concentration, and the ketyl concentration becomes high enough
to promote RTPM, where triplet benzil still survives. When TEA
concentration is higher than 10-2 M, triplet benzil reacts with
TEA to yield CIP and the efficiency of RTPM goes down. These
are the reasons the emissive CIDEP intensity curve shows a
peak around 10-2 M of TEA.
3
state measured at 77 K. We should, however, take back this
idea because that spin polarization by TM from the photoex-
citation of the complex cannot explain the second-order laser
power dependence of the CIDEP signal intensity in this system.
Another mechanism to give emissive polarization is RTPM16-18
which works between a spin relaxed triplet molecule and a free
radical. According to RTPM, radicals always show emissive
polarization regardless of the triplet spin polarization. The singlet
excited state of the complex produced in reaction (3) yields the
ketyl radical following ISC. These processes are thought to be
too fast compared with Larmor precession rate to generate spin
polarization and, hence, the produced radicals would not show
CIDEP. The ketyl radicals produced in reaction (12) interact
with spin relaxed triplet benzil formed in process (6), and
emissive polarization is generated on the free radicals through
RTPM.
Absorptive polarized CIDEP is also plotted in the figure as
a broken line in arbitrary unit. From the curves in Figure 5, it
is easily understood that the polarization changes from emission
to absorption with increase in TEA concentration.
These demonstrations reproduce the experimental results
about the spin polarization inversion depending on the TEA
concentrations.
RTPM
3B* + BH•
8 1B + BHem
(14)
•
Summary
Intensity of the spin polarization due to RTPM is already
calculated by Bla¨ttler and Paul, and we carried out the spin
polarization estimation after their method.19 These are ex-
pressed as
Mechanism of spin polarization generation in photoreaction
of the benzil/triethylamine system was investigated by using
the time-resolved ESR and transient absorption techniques. The
benzil ketyl radicals produced show spin polarization inversion
depending on TEA concentration, emission at low and absorp-
tion at high concentrations. We have analyzed this double-faced
polarization of CIDEP signal with kinetic data and revealed that
photoexcitaion of the ground-state complex yields the ketyl
radicals with emissive polarization through RTPM, and the
triplet state of free benzil forms those with absorptive polariza-
tion through TM. This study demonstrates that RTPM readily
occurs in an ordinary photochemical system under laser excita-
tion condition.
dM
y ) -T2-1My - ω1Mz
(15)
dt
dM
dt
z ) ω1My - T1-1(Mz - Peq[BH•]) + PkRTPM[3Bth*][BH•]
(16)
The triplet state of benzil decays,
k0
9
3B*
8 1B
(17)
(18)
(19)
References and Notes
(1) Scaiano, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 2851
(2) McGimpsey, W. G.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109,
2179
(3) Okutsu, T.; Yano, K.; Kawai, A.; Obi, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1991,
95, 5401.
kT-T
23B*
8 21B
ket
3B* + TEA
9
8 B- + TEA+
(4) Mukai, M.; Yamauchi, S.; Hirota, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 4411.
(5) Yamauchi, S.; Hirota, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 88, 4631.
(6) Morantz, D. J.; Wright, A. J. C. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 692.
(7) Arnett, J. F.; McGlynn, S. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1975, 79, 626.
(8) Asano, K.; Aita, S.; Azumi, T. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 5538.
(9) Brown, C. J.; Sadanaga, R. Acta Crystallogr. 1965, 15, 158.
(10) Morantz, D. J.; Wright, A. J. C. Chem. Phys. 1970, 53, 1622.
(11) Miyasaka, H.; Mataga, N. In Ultrafast Phenomena VII; Harris, C.
B., Ippen, E. P., Montou, G. A., Zewail, A. H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag:
Berlin, 1990; p 501.
(12) Flamigni, L.; Barigelletti, F.; Dollonte, S.; Orlandi, G. J. Photochem.
1983, 21, 237.
(13) Roy, D. S.; Bhattacharyya, K.; Bera, S. C.; Chowdhurry, M. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1980, 69, 134.
(14) Mukai, M.; Yamauchi, S.; Hirota, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 3305.
(15) Mukai, M.; Yamauchi, S.; Hirota, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 9328.
(16) Bla¨ttler, C.; Jent, F.; Paul, H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 166, 375.
(17) Kawai, A.; Obi, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 52.
(18) Kawai, A.; Okutsu, T.; Obi, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 9130.
(19) Bla¨ttler, C.; Paul, H. Res. Chem. Intermed. 1991, 16, 201
(20) Okutsu, T.; Kawai, A.; Obi, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 7757.
(21) Okutsu, T.; Kounose, N.; Nakatsuka, H.; Suzuki, T.; Ichimura, T.;
Hiratsuka, H. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 1998, 115, 243.
(22) Okutsu, T.; Ooyama, M.; Tsuchiya, J.; Obi, K.; Hiratsuka, H. J.
Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 288
where k0 is the single-exponential triplet decay rate k0
)
2 × 104 s-1, kT-T is the rate constant of the T-T annihilation
2kT-T ) 1.3 × 108 M-1 s-1, kRTPM is the rate of the quenching
of the triplet benzil by benzil ketyl radical kRTPM ) 1010 s-1
which is the value of the diffusion-controlled rate, and ket is
the rate constant of electron transfer ket ) 6.0 × 108 s-1 22
. Spin
polarization intensity by RTPM is the simulated ESR time
profile by numeric integration by solving the Bloch equations
and kinetic treatments. The magnetization induced by RTPM
in the z-component is coupled with microwave field amplitude
ω and created the magnetization in the y-component. The
parameters are unknown for T1 and T2 in our system. These
values are quoted from the literature T1 ) 6 µs and T2 ) 0.25
µs-1 19
which are the values in 2-propanol at -50 °C. These
,
must be different from the value at our conditions in benzene
solution at 25 °C; however, we can get some qualitative
information of the CIDEP intensity which corresponds to the
concentration of TEA. ω ) 1.9 × 105 rad s-1 was obtained in
our system. P/Peq ) -60 is used which is reported to be the
adequate ratio of RTPM polarization. Peq is the spin polarization
of the Boltzmann distribution. Because of no two-photon process
(23) Takagi, Y. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985, 119, 5
(24) Carmichel, I.; Hug, G. L,; Murov, S. L. Handbook of Photochem-
istry; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 1992.