tosylate 9. An X-ray analysis of 9† allowed the determination of
Notes and references
its absolute configuration.12 This tosylate could be thus
†
Crystal data for 9: orthorhombic, space group P2
1
3
2
1
2
1
, a = 9.1578(8), b
identified
as
(1S,2R,5R,6S,7R,8R)-2,8-dimethyltricyclo-
=
11.7038(10), c = 16.1527(14) Å, U = 1731.3 Å , Z = 4, T = 2130 °C.
Data collection: a crystal ca. 0.4 3 0.16 3 0.09 mm was used to record
6944 intensities on a Bruker SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer (Mo-Ka
radiation, 2qmax 57°). Structure refinement: the structure was refined
anisotropically on F (program SHELXL-97, G. M. Sheldrick, University of
,5
[
5.3.0.02 ]dec-6-yl tosylate, exhibiting the expected absolute
configuration.
2
Being confident on the absolute configuration of ent-3, we
were now able to perform GC analyses. The absolute configura-
tion of natural (+)-1 can be deduced by analysis of its
degradation product 3, because its relative configuration has
2
G o¨ ttingen) to wR2 0.083, R1 0.032 for 211 parameters and 4388 unique
reflections. The hydrogens were refined using a riding model or rigid
methyl groups. The Flack parameter refined to 20.07(5). CCDC 171200.
See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/cc/b1/b101579f/ for crystallographic files
in .cif or other electronic format.
1
been elucidated during its isolation. Separation of rac-3 was
achieved on a chiral Hydrodex-6-TBDMS stationary phase.‡
The (2)-enantiomer of 3 eluted first, as did the degradation
product of synthetic (2)-kelsoene. The ketone 3 derived from
natural (+)-kelsoene eluted as second peak. In addition, the
synthetic (2)-1 prepared by us showed the expected sign of
optical rotation of [a] 2D 0 = 278.3. These data unequivocally
prove that natural (+)-kelsoene has the opposite configuration as
previously reported and possesses a (1R,2S,5R,6R,7R,8S)-
‡
Separations were performed on a 15 m Hydrodex-6-TBDMS capillary
column (Macherey & Nagel), id 0.25 mm, programmed from 60 to 180 with
5
§
min after a 2 min isothermal period with H
2
as the carrier gas (45 psi).
1
13
25
The H NMR, C NMR, and MS data are identical to those reported in the
1
literature.
[a] = +78.1 (c = 1.98, CHCl ).
3
[a]D = 278.3 (c = 0.31, CHCl ). Literature data for (+)-1:
3
2
5
1
D
8
¶ We also tried to find out why the NMR study by Nabeta et al. furnished
the opposite result. In their work Nabeta et al. presented a preferred
conformation for one of the two formed kelsoene-MBCC adducts.
Unfortunately, they did not explain how they obtained this conformation.
These adducts contain a single bond between the heterocyclic ring and the
,8-dimethyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)tricyclo[5.3.0.02 ]decane
structure.
We proceeded with the synthesis of enantiomerically pure
2)-1 to further underline the consistency of our data set. In
their synthesis of rac-1, Mehta and Srinivas showed that ketone
,5
2
(
7
cyclic core of 1, while in the original paper introducing this method all
examples contain a dihydroisoxazole ring directly linked to the parent cyclic
hydrocarbon, thus reducing the inherent flexibility. Finally, only one of two
formed diastereomers was investigated by NMR and no comparison with
the respective (aR)-MBCC was performed, as should be done in Mosher-
like methods. In essence, their determination of the absolute configuration
relies on several NOE signals observed, while in the present study a sound
chemical correlation is performed. It should be noted that recently a very
informative critique of the Mosher method has been published, which also
applies to related methods.15
3
is strongly hindered and not readily attacked by nucleophiles.
We therefore chose their strategy to reduce steric hindrance:
The bicyclic ketone 8 was transformed into the cyclobutene
derivative 10 as described.
9,13
The side chain was then
elaborated in a new way. Even after reduction of the steric
hindrance, only small nucleophiles can be used to attack the
carbonyl carbon atom. Nevertheless, epoxidation with trime-
thylsulfoxonium iodide was feasible with satisfactory yield.
The epoxide 11 was then hydrogenated and rearranged in one
step to form the aldehyde 12. Addition of methyllithium
followed by oxidation with PDC afforded the ketone 13 in a
1 G. M. König and A. D. Wright, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 3837.
2 K. Nabeta, K. Yamamoto, M. Hashimoto, H. Koshino, K. Funatsuki and
K. Katoh, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1485.
3
U. Warmers, K. Wihstutz, N. Bülow, C. Fricke and W. A. König,
Phytochemistry, 1998, 48, 1723.
8
0+20 dr in favor of the unwanted diastereomer. Obviously the
less hindered hydrogen moves more readily in the epoxide–
aldehyde rearrangement of 12. Nevertheless, simple treatment
with base epimerized this center to the thermodynamically more
favored arrangement, which is also found in the natural product.
Kelsoene was then formed by final methenylation with
4
5
U. Warmers and W. A. König, Phytochemistry, 1999, 52, 1519.
S. Schulz, C. Messer and K. Dettner, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 53,
2
077.
A. Arnone, G. Nasini and O. V. de Pava, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
, 1993, 2723.
6
1
14
Me
2
TiCp2, because Wittig olefination, despite reported by
7 H. Fukui, Y. Fukushi and S. Tahara, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40,
325.
13
Mehta and Srinivas, did not proceed with satisfactory yields.
Thus enantiomerically pure (2)-1 has been synthesized,
confirming our previous assignments.§,¶
8 K. Nabeta, M. Yamamoto, H. Koshino, H. Fukui, Y. Fukushi and S.
Tahara, Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem., 1999, 63, 1772.
9
G. Mehta and K. Srinivas, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 4877.
We thank Professor Nabeta and Professor G. König for
kindly providing us with samples of (+)-kelsoene. We also
thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Fonds der
chemischen Industrie for financial support.
Note added in proof. Similar results were obtained recently
by G. Mehta and K. Srinivas, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 2855,
using a different synthetic strategy.
1
1
1
1
1
0 J. Wolinsky, H. Wolf and T. Gibson, J. Org. Chem., 1963, 28, 274.
1 J. Wolinsky and E. J. Eustache, J. Org. Chem., 1972, 37, 3376.
2 P. Jones, I. Dix, S. Fietz-Razavian and S. Schulz, unpublished results.
3 G. Mehta and K. Srinivas, Synlett, 1999, 5, 555.
4 N. A. Petasis and E. I. Bzowej, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 6392.
15 J. M. Seco, E. Quiñoá and R. Riguera, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2000,
11, 2781.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 2154–2155
2155