Journal of Natural Products
Article
solution. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humid
atmosphere in the presence of 5% CO2.55
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This research was supported by grants from MINECO
(AGL2015-65684-C2-1-R and HI2007-0026) and the Italian
Ministry of University and Research (Project PRIN no.
2006072204). Use of NMR facilities at the Servicio Centra-
lizado de Ciencia y Tecnologia (SCCYT) of the University of
Cadiz is acknowledged.
After 44 h of incubation, all cultures were supplemented with
cytochalasin-B (Cyt B) at a final concentration of 6 μg/mL. After 48
h, lymphocyte cultures were treated with an aqueous solution of
patulin (1) or DPA (5) in sterile double-distilled water to obtain final
concentrations of 0.10, 0.50, 1, 5, and 10 μM. Sterile double-distilled
water was used as the solvent control, whereas positive controls were
EMS (240 μg/mL), an alkylating agent, and COL (0.02 μg/mL), a
microtubule-disrupting tubulin-binding agent.
́
́
REFERENCES
■
At the end of the 72 h incubation period, the lymphocytes were
collected and treated with a mild hypotonic treatment (RPMI 1640
medium−H2O, 1:2, supplemented with 2% FCS) for 2 min and then
fixed in ice-cold methanol−acetic acid (1:1). The slides were prepared
by cytocentrifugation, air-dried, and stained with May Grunwald-
Giemsa.56 All were coded prior to scoring. Scoring was done by using
a Zeiss Axioplan light microscope at 1000× magnification under oil
immersion. MNi, NPBs, and BUDs were scored according to the
criteria described by Fenech et al.57 by examining at least 2000 BN
cells for each concentration of the compounds under assessment
(1000 for each culture). The frequencies of MNi, NPBs, or BUDs in
1000 BN cells were then calculated for each treatment. Cell-cycle
parameters were evaluated by classifying 1000 cells according to the
number of nuclei. The nuclear division index was calculated according
to eq 1, where M1 through M4 indicate the number of cells with 1−4
nuclei and N indicates the total number of scored cells.56 Necrotic
and apoptotic cells were scored according to the guidelines reported
by Fenech et al.57 So, 1000 cells were counted and scored as either
mononucleated, binucleated, trinucleated, tetranucleated, apoptotic,
or necrotic, and percentages of the different types of cells were
calculated. Assays with high % of necrotic or apoptotic or few BN cells
were classified as “toxic”.
(1) Benkerroum, N. Int. Dairy J. 2016, 62, 63−75.
(2) Pitt, J. J.; Hocking, A. D. Fungi and Food Spoilage; Blackie
Academic & Professional: London, 1997.
(3) Wright, S. A. I. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 5, 105−109.
(4) Madhyastha, M. S.; Marquardta, R. R.; Masi, A.; Borsa, J.;
Frohllch, A. A. J. Food Prot. 1994, 57, 48−53.
(5) Iwahashi, Y.; Hosoda, H.; Park, J. H.; Lee, J. H.; Suzuki, Y.;
Kitagawa, E.; Murata, S. M.; Jwa, N.-S.; Gu, M.-B.; Iwahashi, H. J.
Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 1936−1942.
(6) Bottalico, A.; Lerario, P.; Visconti, A. Phytopathol. Mediterr.
1980, 19 (2−3), 196−198.
(7) Puel, O.; Galtier, P.; Oswald, I. P. Toxins 2010, 2, 613−631.
(8) De Melo, F. T.; De Oliveira, I. M.; Greggio, S.; Dacosta, J. C.;
Gueceva, T. N.; Saffi, J.; Henriques, J. A.; Rosa, R. M. Food Chem.
Toxicol. 2012, 50, 3548−3555.
(9) Zhou, A. M.; Jiang, L. P.; Geng, C. Y.; Cao, J.; Zhoumg, L. F.
Toxicon 2009, 53, 584−586.
(10) Ayed-Boussema, I.; Abassi, H.; Bouaziz, C.; Hlima, W. B.; Ayed,
Y.; Bacha, H. Environ. Toxicol. 2013, 6, 299−306.
(11) Alves, I.; Oliveira, N. G.; Laires, A.; Rodrigues, A. S.; Rueff, J.
Mutagenesis 2000, 15, 229−234.
(12) Liu, B. H.; Yu, T. S.; Li, S. Y.; Su, M. C.; Wang, M. C.; Shih, S.
M. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2003, 191, 255−263.
(13) Donmez-Altuntas, H.; Gokalp-Yildiz, P.; Bitgen, N.; Hamurcu,
Z. Mycotoxin Res. 2013, 29, 63−70.
(14) Glaser, N.; Stopper, H. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2012, 50, 1796−
1801.
M1 + 2M2 + 3M3 + 4M4
NDI =
(1)
N
The experiments were performed in triplicate, and each
concentration was tested in two parallel cultures. Data from the
three experiments were pooled.
Statistical Analysis. All values from toxicity experiments are
means SD. Student’s t-test was used for comparing the mean of a
specific treatment with a control mean. P ≤ 0.05 was considered as
statistically significant.
(15) Zhou, S. M.; Jiang, L. P.; Geng, C. Y.; Cao, J.; Zhong, L. F.
Toxicon 2010, 55, 390−395.
(16) Ferrer, E.; Garcia, J.; Font, G.; Ruiz, M. J. Toxicol. In Vitro
2009, 23, 1504−1509.
(17) Korte, A. Mutat. Res., Genet. Toxicol. Test. 1980, 78, 41−49.
(18) Song, E.; Xia, X.; Su, C.; Dong, W.; Xian, Y.; Wang, W.; Song,
Y. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 7, 122−127.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
(19) World Health Organization. Evaluation of certain food additives
and contaminants. Forty-fourth report of the joint FAO/WHO expert
committee on food additives. WHO Technical Report Series 859,
Geneva, 1995; pp 36−38.
■
S
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
(20) European-Commission. Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19
December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in
foodstuffs, L 364/5, 2006.
1
1H and 13C NMR spectra for patulin (1) and H, 13C,
(21) Moake, M. M.; Padilla-Zakour, O. I.; Worobo, R. W. Compr.
Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2005, 1, 8−21.
2
and H NMR spectra for DPA (5) (PDF)
(22) Kabak, B.; Dobson, A. D. W.; Var, I. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.
2006, 46, 593−619.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
(23) Assatarakul, K.; Churey, J. J.; Manns, D. C.; Worobo, R. W. J.
Food Prot. 2012, 75, 717−724.
■
Corresponding Authors
(24) Sant’Ana, A. S.; Rosenthal, A.; Massaguer, P. R. Food Res. Int.
2008, 41, 441−453.
Fax: +39 0541 4343600.
́
́
́
(25) Halasz, A.; Lasztity, R.; Abonyi, T.; Bata, A. Food Rev. Int. 2009,
25, 284−298.
(26) Mahunu, G. K.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Q.; Li, C.; Zheng, X. Crit. Rev.
Microbiol. 2016, 42 (4), 643−655.
ORCID
(27) Moss, M. O.; Long, M. T. Food Addit. Contam. 2002, 19 (4),
387−399.
(28) Ricelli, A.; Baruzzi, F.; Solfrizzo, M.; Morea, M.; Fanizzi, F. P.
Appl. Environ. Microb. 2007, 73, 785−792.
́
́
Notes
(29) Hawar, S.; Vevers, W.; Karieb, S.; Ali, B. K.; Billington, R.; Be, J.
Food Control 2013, 34, 502−508.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
G
J. Nat. Prod. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX